« first day (3008 days earlier)      last day (1976 days later) » 

12:01 AM
@SaschaP I'm awake but not that awake....
could you link the question please? I can take a look and make some suggestions
ah
 
@JourneymanGeek thanks for your answer. here is the link:
https://superuser.com/questions/1382795/
in the meantime there have been some helpully comments
 
@SaschaP few things.
1) Its super broad
its 3 questions
2) quite literally any modern system can do this without breaking a sweat
and well
you have the software and the hardware....
so why not test it?
windows has enough telemetry without even additional software to tell what the bottleneck is from task manager for this
 
i don't have the SSD so far...
but i will buy one if it would be sufficient
 
the USB 3.0 could be the bottleneck
 
really?
 
12:05 AM
but I doubt
So two things, and I'm sure folks in the main room will politely call me an idiot if I'm wrong....
1) USB does use CPU
2) USB often sucks.
but USB in theory should handle it with no problems - you do have USB 2.0 fast ethernet adaptors
So if you would probably rescope the questions to where the bottlenecks would be, and how to locate them...
It stops being a hardware rec, and its a single question "I have this system - how do I locate and fix the bottlenecks in it?"
There's a few other things worth considering
Its unlikely to be a problem but the quality and reliability of NICs varies a lot
I've happily pushed gigabit speeds over WAN with intel NICs
and I've had really fun problems (tm) with realtek cards
 
ok, thanks. i just thought asking one question (instead of 3) based on my project offers a better overview about the problem...
referring to your proposed question title: it seems that i'm asking questions before the problem may occur and not after i observed the problem
 
Ya
chances are, honestly, even with a spinning rust external drive, it should be no issue
 
what exactly is a NIC? do you mean a network information center?
is there any comparable thing in a local network?
 
an NIC is a network interface card
 
aaaah, okay, now i see
 
12:16 AM
now, this may seem a little odd - but one thing you need to keep in mind is, if you're passing it through a router - the router might be a bottleneck
considering these are devices you might be able to get away with just static IPs on everything and a switch
 
okay, i'll check if the built in NIC is an intel
if so, networking to/from my laptop should not be a problem, right?
static IPs are not a problem, the devices do have static IPs already
 
naw
Intels are pretty much the gold standard IMO
 
okay that's fine!
so how about USB... I also noticed different behaviour of different external drives. I'm not a hardware specialist but in my mind this can only have to reasons:
1) hard drive writing speed
2) the controller
 
all of the above
;p
 
haha, ok
 
12:20 AM
USB can be finicky
 
so it would be better to find an external hard drive (SSD) with manufacturer-independent benchmarks to assure that the hard drive fits my performance requiremens, than using any case with a brand new high-speed SSD, right?
and to the last thing, CPU/USB-bottleneck: are there any portable NAS-like devices which can receive UDP-packets out of the box?
or is the only way to modify the built-in hard drive to a bigger one so that i don't have to send data to the USB device?
 
1:01 AM
@SaschaP depends on your budget.
I half suspect modern raspberry pi or clone might meet your needs
Or a good ol nuc class machine
Orrrrr
If your PC has a CD drive...
Can stick an SSD there
But ya. Try benchmarking first
 
i already thought about a raspberry, but despite gigabit it just has 300 Mbps...
 
but you need 100 no?
 
100 megabyte ;-)
raspberry has just 300 megabit, so ~37 megabyte
 
now I'm wondering if I can set my web speed benchmark to save to specific locations.
Would be a good way to do benchmarking since my home internet connection is tested to be gigabit
 

« first day (3008 days earlier)      last day (1976 days later) »