« first day (3771 days earlier)      last day (1200 days later) » 

12:00 AM
"Best practices" does seem like a far more healthy view of this kind of thing than "The Law".
3
 
+ further if you have discovered different/better things that are working well in specific situations, let's discuss that, it's probably worthwhile at least considering
 
That's what really concerns me, though. Users who seem particularly active with regard to moderation tasks seem to lean pretty hard on "meta is the law" as a basis for their actions. I think that that's understandable-- the site maintenance-style stack moderation tasks tend to favor that approach. But when others disagree, a link to meta becomes the entire (public) argument for the initial action. My sense is that no one who favors a "meta is the law" approach, to any degree,
is going to be broken out of that habit by any other method. But I could be pretty far off on that
I have more tangential experience with those kinds of issues here than most high-activity users that come into chat
 
The "meta is law" issue got further radicalized a few times in the last year or so by a policy troll, that didn't help.
 
@BESW who hasn’t been seen since, which is nice.
 
12:15 AM
well their M.O. has been that they'd sporadically vanish, then come back with a changed name or create a new account, and then we'd figure out who it was again after a couple of months and then they'd do it again
 
@doppelgreener so what you’re saying is, rpg.se is a game of Among Us?
 
@ThomasMarkov oh no, we're recursing
 
@ThomasMarkov you wish, it's actually Space Station 13
 
Hmm... Thomas kinda suss
2
 
 
1 hour later…
1:40 AM
popping by to be annoyed: this edit of mine was rejected by the OP, who later made the exact same edit to their post... unsure why that happened. so.
 
7
Q: Are Markdown tables superior to MathJax arrays for accessibility?

KRyanTables are really rough on screenreaders and other consumers of web accessibility features. Getting them right is an art, one I have practiced a bit professionally, though I remain a novice. The overwhelming majority of options available to web designers to improve accessibility with respect to t...

 
ah. i didn't check meta, thanks
 
1:56 AM
5
Q: 14th level Artificer (Magic Item Savant) + Metamagic Adept items to regain sorcery points

Luca PaolellaConsidering a 14th level artificer with the Metamagic Adept feat in D&D 5e: I'm assuming that the feat does not grant the ability to restore sorcery points by expending spell slots (since it doesn't grant the Flexible Casting feature) It seems to me that an artificer could use the Bloodwell Vial...

 
2:52 AM
Upcoming Kickstarter: Noctis Labyrinth by Mordis Press. A no-prep adventure for World of Dungeons. Delve into the veins of the Red Desert. Explore the mysteries of the Labyrinth. #ZineQuest3
Upcoming Kickstarter: d36: A Strange RPG Zine by Chris Bissette. A strange RPG zine, delivered quarterly.
For the People I Love by MimiMerlot. A solo journaling game about preparing food for people you love
Layout Level-up! by Speak the Sky and 53 others. Want games at a meteoric discount? Want to help designers get better tools for making better-looking games? Every 2 purchases buys 1 designer a license for Affinity Publisher!
I Was Going To a Picnic, But Then a Kaiju Showed Up! by BitwiseCoyote. You were heading to a picnic when the alarms went off. A kaiju was spotted heading straight for the city. Again. Your city needs to be defended, although this game doesn't have to be about your characters defending it. You can play as the heroes of the city, or you can play as a group of people struggling to deal with the creature's affect on your home.
Upcoming Kickstarter: Microvania: A Map-Making Hack of Microscope #ZineQuest3 by Zargo Games. A print run of Microvania, a map-making and story-telling game that is a hack of Microscope
Upcoming Kickstarter: The Knights of the Road by Bordercholly. A Tiny Role-Playing Game of High-Flying Adventure in a Monster-Infested 1920s
 
 
1 hour later…
4:26 AM
3
Q: How do the Warding Bond and Sanctuary spells interact?

RaininsanSo I (war cleric) and my friend (paladin) want to use warding bond. It says: [...] While the target is within 60 feet of you, it gains a +1 bonus to AC and saving throws, and it has resistance to all damage. Also, each time it takes damage, you take the same amount of damage. [...] So the quest...

 
Soooooooooooooooo......... Is it asking too much for a tool that will automatically convert Mathjax tables into Markup tables? I've been going through my old answers to adjudicate which tables should be updated and which should be left alone, and came across this answer and my eyes immediately glazed over from the terror of the amount of effort it's going to take to convert all of them.
I could probably write a tool myself, only because I know that, of the tables that I know should be converted over, they all tend to have the same format.
But if a tool already exists, I'd rather just use that.
 
There's a browser addon that tries to insert reader-accessible markdown into Mathjax tables on the fly.
I don't know if that would be of use, but might be worth looking at.
 
Maybe.
My guess though is that it's not going to save me from manually rewriting most of the table, unless it plays nice with something like Excel.
 
 
2 hours later…
6:22 AM
Alright, I wrote a program for it. Can be found here: chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/56865577#56865577
 
Wow, I literally just wrote a series of find+replace regex experssions for myself XD
 
6:56 AM
1
Q: Can the Wish spell change my spell list?

Vasilis MavropoulosI’m 20 level Bard this was my first PC. So I was not very experienced and I’m not happy with the spells I chose so I would like to find a way to change my spell list. I thought “wish” spell could help me on that and I want know whether I can use the Wish spell to change my spell list?

 
 
2 hours later…
8:26 AM
[ SmokeDetector | MS ] Bad keyword in link text in body, potentially bad ns for domain in body (70): Yahoo customer service? by john adem on rpg.SE (@Rubiksmoose)
 
9:23 AM
@BESW Heeeey I watched this already the other day, I'm a big fan of their vids
 
10:10 AM
@doppelgreener The last time was the only time they actually created a new account though. Before, it was kinda obvious because they just changed their username.
 
 
2 hours later…
12:12 PM
@kviiri yeah, that's true
 
12:28 PM
@doppelgreener in the case of the system guessing discussion using the policy as word of law prevents most of the conflict and redirects it to the issues of the state of that discussion.
 
1:18 PM
@Akixkisu yes, but it also pre-empts capacity for us to make case by case judgement calls, and in doing so is a source of conflict; it also makes it far more difficult to have meta discussion at all. (we have already had users attempt to to coordinate to shut down any attempts to discuss case-by-case issues on meta, including promising they would use their privileges to prevent them from ever happening. they have in turn been prevented from doing that, or overridden, but it's still happened.)
 
I'm skeptical that flooding a new user's notifications with fragments of an ongoing policy disagreement is preferable to flooding their notifications with talk about their own question.
 
this is exactly the thing i'm referring to when i said we deliberately seeded the idea of paying attention to the letter of the law above individual judgement, and this is the kind of consequences that are coming back to bite us
 
Not that either is necessarily great, but one certainly seems more impersonal and unwelcoming than the other.
 
well sure
again, when i said maybe a specific comment discussion should stay on mainsite and not come to chat, i did not know the bigger context. i did however know it was between two users who keep not getting along here in chat and who might be capable of having a quick back and forth in comments and calling it done without needing to come here.
 
The source of conflict seems to stem instead from how we interact with policy.
 
1:24 PM
"could you clarify what you're referencing in that comment?" "i'm referencing this" doesn't require discussing ongoing policy disagreement. that part could happen in chat if the participants want, but there's capacity to just ask for clarification and call it done in the comments themselves.
 
Yeah, I'm more speaking to the negative impacts of shifting from discussion of the particular question, to discussion of policy, every time a new question arises.
More room for policy to provide principles by which to judge cases on individual merits, would make the conversations on new users' questions more welcoming to the user and less like they got plunged head-first into the middle of a telenovela.
 
i super agree with that
 
Morning!
 
good morning!
 
or early afternoon and evening!
 
1:28 PM
@BESW which directly runs into the problem of disagreement about how policy ought to be.
 
But yes, I agree that "policy" implies things that it shouldn't and gives it more credence than it maybe should.
 
Hey o7
 
It should be more guidance than anything. Policy implies hard lines, and I think we're moving away from hard lines.
But that should mean more discussions about edge cases - but then there's the question of where to do those.
But all sides need to take a step back from their positions in order for that to work.
 
Which I argue should strictly be on meta.
 
The moose is loose!
@Akixkisu That's a tough call. But as members have become more entrenched and less friendly about debate, that does seem like a better place.
It's not always discussions or debates in comments, it's often arguments with unhealthy doses of snark.
 
1:31 PM
Not sure how helpful this observation really is, but if everyone followed the current state of policy on main and aired their grievances on meta the issue of new users seeing awkward policy disagreements goes away entirely.
 
@ThomasMarkov yes, but that's basically saying that if everyone just magically agreed there would be no disagreement
which isn't all that useful as a sentiment
we're not disagreeing because it's a fun exercise, there's actual reasons people are disagreeing
 
@doppelgreener No, not at all. "if everyone followed the current state of policy on main and aired their grievances on meta". There is a place for disagreement, and you can choose to disagree there, or you can choose to disagree in public in front of new users.
 
But it's how we disagree that matters. And it does seem like those disagreements aren't as friendly as they should be.
 
hm, fair, i misread
(a lot) (somehow)
 
We really need to start with the idea that we're all coming at this from a good place. We want this to be the best possible stack that it can be. Almost* no one is coming it at this from a bad place.
(*almost because there have been some users who did.)
 
1:36 PM
@ThomasMarkov exactly.
Which still has practical issues, but fewer direct arguments than arguing about the user's question in front of them resulting in flooding their notifications.
 
The problem with moving to meta is the drop off in interaction which may lend more emphasis to the party who started the question on meta.
 
@Akixkisu Yes, and we should talk about those practical issues, such as certain users complaining about being exhausted when we try to talk about this.
 
There is a distinction of arguing in front of the user and talking to the user about their question.
 
@Akixkisu However, some users don't seem to even want that.
 
Sure, we have a plurality of thoughts regarding this, hence the discussion - it becomes frustrating when it stagnates.
A continous discussion is necessary, but it wears people down.
 
2:01 PM
Deferring to the policy and peacefully abstaining from the argument is only a possibility when that argument occurs on meta (sorry bystanders in chat). We really shouldn't force that participating onto people who are tired by the ongoing conversation.
 
2:12 PM
personally to the extent people are claiming they are worn down or exhausted, that's on them to step away from
i haven't seen anyone actually claim "i personally am worn down" bar like, one person? but i have it said a lot as a generality, and in light of that it's a very [citation needed] generality
last time we had a big discussion on this topic, it went just fine like any other meta discussion would be expected to
i myself have said outright here in chat "i can't actually address this because i have a lot of other stuff happening right now", but i haven't said i'm worn down by the topic or asked it to stop on my account—I just have limited time and energy for things and it's not always going to be available for this
(have seen* it said a lot as a generality)
 
@NautArch Moving a conversation to a different location always results in a significant drop-off in participation
 
2:36 PM
@RevenantBacon Not true, I was at a bar once that was stupid loud, and we went outside and everyone started talking to each other more.
 
@ThomasMarkov so you mean some conversations are best had in Not A Bar
 
3:18 PM
4
Q: How to work with Portent for replacing enemy rolls

BrondahlIt seems like, RAW, if a Divination Wizard is in the party then the DM would have to ask that player whether they want to interrupt the roll ... on every single roll that any NPC makes. That's going to be really tedious :( It could also sometimes include rolls that the players might not otherwise...

 
3:48 PM
2
Q: Why is my homebrew review question not getting answers, and how can I improve them?

field158I've asked several homebrew-review questions in the past, and it's been pointed out to me in the past that there are several guides on RPG.SE for these type of questions, I used this one and this one. However, my latest homebrew review question did not get any answer; the best it got is a more-th...

 
4:05 PM
@ThomasMarkov Some of it would continue regardless because of people not knowing the "policy". And, well... it isn't particularly easy to find out; or rather, there's plenty of ways people could believe something else to be the policy
 
4:47 PM
@doppelgreener not HBDs?
 
@AncientSwordRage I think that was a joke from Thomas's previous line.
 
@NautArch I thought it might be
 
5:25 PM
4
Q: In 3.5 dnd how far can a wolf drag a 175 lb human on tundra?

Lori DelongOne of my players is arguing that a wolf cannot drag a 175 lb human including gear more then 5 ft. How far can they drag them?

 
@HotRPGQuestions Congrats, you're our 180,000th customer!
 
5:44 PM
JC just tweeted that the Echos from an Echo Knight are objects with no weight
2
So you can pick them up with mage hand
or yeet them with Catapult
 
Could you cast animate objects on it then?
 
@Someone_Evil oh jeez...
I spotted the first inconsistency:
> For example, the text of the cure wounds spell
specifies that the spell doesn’t work on a
creature that has the Construct or Undead type.
> Having More Than One Type. Some creatures are of more than one creature type. If an effect works on at least one of a creature’s types, that effect can work on that creature. For example, if you are both a Humanoid and an Undead, cure wounds works on you, since the spell works on a Humanoid.
So which is it?
 
GcL
Having more than one creature type is problematic.
 
THANKS I HATE IT
 
Not being on twitter is really one of the best decisions I've made
 
5:54 PM
@AncientSwordRage A friendly reminder that we are looking at playtest material, so inconsistencies should be noted and reported to their survey next month―and also should be, to some degree, expected.
 
@Xirema this is true, but it seems like an obvious contradiction worth drawing attention to
 
@AncientSwordRage /facepalm. Zero editing. Gotta love it.
 
@AncientSwordRage Yep.
I think the idea "if a feature works on at least one of a creature's types, then it works on the creature as a whole" is perfectly fine and a good way to simplify rules problems, but if they want to go this route, they need to explicitly answer two other problems:

1. Some features specifically say they /don't/ work on certain creature types, as opposed to specifically working on certain creature types. Should "this doesn't work on undead or constructs" be interpreted as "this works on anything that is not an undead or construct"?
 
Banishment is better against non-humanoids?
 
@Carcer depends on the humanoid
 
6:00 PM
@Carcer Err, I've misrepresented the spell on accident. It specifically says "creatures whose native plane is not the current plane".
This is commonly interpreted to mean "fey (Feywilds), elementals (Outer Planes), fiends (Outer Planes), celestials (Outer Planes)", but there could very well be creatures of each of those types that are, nonetheless, native to the Material Plane (or the plane on which the campaign is taking place).
Oh well, can't edit now.
 
If they want these options to make you undead and have (all) the healing magic still work, give them a specific feature for that. "However, cure wounds and similar healing magic still works on you, despite your undead nature"
 
At any rate, I have a pretty good sense of how I'd answer both those questions ("No, if a spell says 'does not work on undead', a humanoid/undead would be ineligible for the spell" and "Yes; if a spell does 10d10 extra damage against Fey, then a Fey/Humanoid PC would take the extra 10d10 damage"), but I don't think either of those are spelled out in the rules, yet.
 
The dhampir bite is probably going to have some totally broken combos.
 
@Someone_Evil That's how I'd do it too. Put a feature in any Undead-themed playable races that specifies as such.
 
@ThomasMarkov Do they still put the notice about UA not tuned for multiclassing?
or is that gone?
 
6:05 PM
@NautArch This is a race.
 
Hexblood seems fun, but they pivot from Eldritch magic, fey energy or mysterious witchcraft to 100% HAGS 24/7, in about one sentence
 
Balancing a player character around the inherent inability to be healed by magic is pretty broken for 5e.
 
@ThomasMarkov ohmy
 
"gain a bonus to the next ability check or attack
roll you make; the bonus equals the damage
dealt by the bite"
 
@ThomasMarkov how do you make the bite do more than 1d4 though?
 
6:06 PM
@Xirema Eh... 5e has lots of options that can heal undead. Or at least a bunch that omits the can't heal undead clause
 
Also, I'm lol'ing at idea of them biting a party member for bonuses to non-combat checks
 
@AncientSwordRage Crusader's mantle?
 
@AncientSwordRage Class features.
 
oh it's a natural weapon
I did a dumb
 
simple melee weapon
yeah and natural weapon
 
6:07 PM
@Someone_Evil I would dispute the claim "lots". They certainly exist, and some of them even exist at low level. But I think any expectation that an undead PC will receive healing will require build consideration by the rest of the party.
 
Probably, but the game doesn't break by not having a healer (though it shifts a bit).
 
yeah, damage output rapidly outpaces healing ability in most cases
the big kicker is that it makes it harder to pop them back up from dying
 
GcL
@ThomasMarkov Maybe it's he's born with it? Maybe it's Wolverine.
2
 
@Someone_Evil I've got a group of 4 with no healer in Rime. Haven't killed them yet!
 
@ThomasMarkov At least it can't be combo'd with sneak attack
 
6:13 PM
@NautArch I was pretty sure we were gonna wipe on friday.
 
@ThomasMarkov naaaah
why you think a deadly encounter might kill yoU?
 
@ThomasMarkov Does "Vampire Monk" even count as a combo? It does seem pretty powerful.
 
@Xirema This is what I was thinking.
 
Small Dhampir + Squat Nimbleness is the limit of my ability to cheese
 
@ThomasMarkov if it makes the monk more powerful, not sure that's a bad thing.
 
6:19 PM
@NautArch Does the Monk class have power issues in your experience? (it doesn't in mine)
 
@Someone_Evil It varies depending on campaign, TBH.
 
@Someone_Evil They just are fairly limited in what they can do at the table compared to other classes. I personally like them, but my tables have found them underwhelming.
 
My experience is that Monks do just fine.
 
The Monk in my campaign (Shadow Monk) is an absolute beast at combat mobility, and has on more than one occasion tipped the scales of a situation simply by virtue of being able to run at 150 feet per round with no resource expenditure.
 
@NautArch If you kill bernie Ill make a monk and show you what's what.
 
6:22 PM
But he's also nearly gotten himself killed trying to fight a Water Elemental all on his own.
 
@ThomasMarkov I said I love the monk, but my tablemates have not :)
and unless you kill bernie, i'm not likely to.
 
🙃
 
@NautArch inb4 wild magic fireball on self.
 
@ThomasMarkov it could happen!
there are some fun wild magic surges
the switching places was underwhelming last session
*switching personalities
 
@NautArch Switching places with the giant so that I was riding the mammoth would have been great.
 
6:24 PM
@NautArch That did happen to our party of 4th levels with no healer. Totally wasn't my fault
 
So I actually like all three lineages posted in today's UA, with the established caveat about the rules haziness around a creature having multiple creature types.
 
@Someone_Evil it's a 1:100 chance using my table
 
Also the tavern we were in was fine. Promise
 
@Someone_Evil I'm sure The Stone Cup was fine.
The Wooden Chair next door, though.
 
6:43 PM
 
@NautArch heh
 
@AncientSwordRage apropos of the dhampir race
 
@NautArch I thought as much
 
7:22 PM
@AncientSwordRage Catapult has a minimum weight, so no, you can't.
 
7:33 PM
(also, "Hexblood"? gaaaah)
 
0
Q: How did I get the dnd-5e tag badge when I'm ignoring all the dnd tags I can find?

Zeiss IkonJust what it says on the tin -- I just received the "dnd-5e" tag badge, but I haven't answered a "dnd-5e" question in a couple months, because I started ignoring them to curtail temptation to answer when I don't have resources at work to make good answers. In the past, when I've gotten tag badges...

 
@TheOracle Duplicate.
7
Q: Re-earned all my tag badges at once

SdjzToday I had virtually no activity on the site (other than visiting) and to my surprise I somehow just earned all of my tag badges simultaneously. As far as I am aware I already had all these badges before, earned at the appropriate time but they are now showing up as earned today. You can see the...

 
7:57 PM
1
Q: When sharing the Eyes of Night darkvision, does a creature needs to always be 10 feet close to the cleric to be granted the benefits?

MakrauThe Eyes of Night feature from the Twilight Domain Cleric, introduced in Tasha's Cauldron of Everything pg. 34, grants darkvision to the cleric: You can see through the deepest gloom. You have darkvision out to a range of 300 feet. It also allows the cleric to share this darkvision with willing...

1
Q: What happen if a Twilight Domain Cleric that shared his darkvision becomes unconscious or die?

MakrauThe Eyes of Night feature from the Twilight Domain Cleric, introduced in Tasha's Cauldron of Everything pg. 34, grants darkvision to the cleric: You can see through the deepest gloom. You have darkvision out to a range of 300 feet. It also allows the cleric to share this darkvision with willing...

 
@MarkWells oh no
@MarkWells bleeh blehhhh!
 
8:38 PM
A new instance of the Speak with Animals spell
https://twitter.com/i/status/1353328699425210368
 
9:26 PM
@KorvinStarmast she's clearly a totem barbarian
 
9:38 PM
Is this homebrew spell as bad as it seems to be? rpg.stackexchange.com/q/180021/53087
 
Yeah. I like spells with significant risks to the caster but this one has far too much downside for what it gives you (i.e. probably nothing).
 
Yeah, that's a thing that 5e doesn't really do. There are almost no spells that pose a risk to the caster, with the exception of AOE damage spells and Wish
 
Contact Other Plane?
 
@Someone_Evil herp-derp, I was literally just looking at that like 10 mins ago.
But even then, that's a super low-risk spell
4d6 damage and insanity until you get a rest
Which basically just means you cast it, then immediately take a rest if it fails. It's not generally something you cast in the middle of a dungeon
 
9:53 PM
Oh, it's until LR. That makes less risky
I mean, depends on the dungeon you're in
 
If you have to cast it to be able to actually clear the dungeon, then you're already in deep trouble, and being insane isn't going to make it much worse
If you don't have to cast it to clear the dungeon, then you wait until you have cleared it, then cast it
 
10:23 PM
@RevenantBacon I mean, I'm all for redesigning all the spells to have a chance of making your head explode, but if only one of them does it then nobody's going to use that one.
 
@RevenantBacon And, of course, Jim's magic missile
 
The Pinto was a bad car because it had a downside that most cars don't.
 
And those creature summoning spells where the creature can become hostile
 
@Medix2 See, that strikes me as a good balancing tool. Conjure celestial is 7th level and gets you a CR 4 angel. Conjure elemental is 5th level and gets a CR 5 elemental that can become hostile if you aren't careful. Summon greater demon is only 4th level and gets you a CR 5 demon that will actively try to kill you.
 
11:27 PM
Kickstarter: Lighthearted, a Magical 80s RPG by Kurt Potts. You're a Prep, Jock, Geek, Rebel, or Outcast, like in The Breakfast Club, except you are just about to start magic community college!
Let's Rob RJ McElhenny and Steal Her Golden Quill by Glaive Guisarme Games. A story game about wizard crime and bad authors
Upcoming Kickstarter: The Trans Rage Trilogy by Glaive Guisarme Games. A trio of angry trans zines by an angry trans girl.
Anoriand wrote a brief twitter thread reminded designers that the element that heals doesn't always have to be water.
John's Birthday Sale A bundle by Knucklebone Magazine, $8.38 for KNUCKLEBONE MAGAZINE 1: GENERATION, KNUCKLEBONE MAG 2: RE-VIEW
Diogo Oldskull shared a cover reveal on twitter for the upcoming Kosmosaurs TTRPG.
 

« first day (3771 days earlier)      last day (1200 days later) »