How to handle this question ? (trying out link command lul) - it was editted and changed completely, so both our answers kinda don't make sense any more.
@skout to be fair, if you yourself don't know, it's hard we can help. You might tell us broadly what you want and we could help narrow it down with some questions, though.
@skout This is usually a decent place to hash out that kind of thing. Perhaps you should start with whether it's a player-social problem, or a system-rules problem.
There was a question that this tweet would have been relevant to about a spell that had an effect at the end of each turn or something (the question mentioned something about out of combat applications). I think you answered it @Rubiksmoose ; just can't remember
@Anaphory I found a sauna for you if you don't mind a bit of a punk aesthetic. Sompasauna, "the most public sauna in Helsinki", built by a loose group of volunteers on a disused pier.
@Zachiel I saw all three at the same time yesterday! (plus about two and a half fishes too)
There was a guy wanted to live in the sauna and since the structure wasn't exactly legal, they had some trouble getting official aid to extract the troublemaker
Yeah, stupid city council de-punking the punk out of it :<
But anyway, "the most public" refers to the fact that there's no reservation policy or admission fees, you just show up whenever you please with firewood and water and get cracking. I've met some really interesting people there
One guy was a retired game designer for a "largish" game design company he wouldn't name. Not sure if he was speaking the truth, but he had some really good points about game design :)
By the way, could we get a mod star on the designer reason questions?
I think it's a fairly significant deal even if/because it seems rather one-sided.
@Rubiksmoose I think it's just because those aren't the useful kinds of grease that you'd want to be able to create in order to ignite your enemies. The question is not "Is grease flammable?", it is "Can I create the flammable kind of grease?"
@kviiri AFAIremeber, doppelgreener's list is complete, but I summarize it as "all 2d0 rolls except saves, plus defenses". My definition infamously failed when we met green slaadi, who have a d20 damage attack. XD
Whilst the rep notification dialog is loading just fine on MSE...
... it's not loading on other sites I've tried (Stack Overflow, RPG Stack Exchange, or Board & Card Games Stack Exchange) and instead just loads forever:
The same is occurring with my inbox.
It's working exactly the same way...
@doppelgreener Which makes the fact that people ever have to edit my posts embarassing. But also explains why I have occasionally made edits to other people's posts that were deemed unnecessary (I'm too used to proofing everything for housestyle, rather than simply comprehension).
In case of most edits, I like to blame my phone...
"WRITE WELL" ALWAYS CONTEXTUAL! HULK ENCOURAGE YOU TO FIND YOUR OWN VOICE, JUST LIKE HULK DID! WRITE IN YOUR DIALECT! MAKE JOKES! BE CASUAL IN CASUAL MEDIUMS! SAVOR LANGUAGE'S FLEXIBILITY! EVEN USE ALL CAPS AND ONLY EXCLAMATION POINTS IF YOU WANT! https://twitter.com/Fox26Mike/status/955882996816601089
I think one of the problems with SE from a copywriting point of view, is that its' rep system rewards writing a passable answer to a question and publishing it as quickly as possible, tidying it up or expanding it later. Whereas IRL, it normally pays to work on a draft for a few days then publish something polished, i Stack five other people will have already answered by then and even if your answer is now appreciably the best it's unlikely to garner the votes to show it, any time soon, if ever.
Stack's rep system also seems to reward extensively editing posts another way too. Whenever an edit is posted, that post, however old, shoots back up to the top of the active questions lists, giving it a new lease of exposure. So the more unfinished your initial answer, the more often you can legitimately nudge your post back to the top of the list, without your edits appearing frivolous.
I'm not sure if people really do try to exploit this deliberately, but it seems problematic to me.
Old posts are edited infrequently enough that I doubt anyone's doing it in problematic amounts here. I wouldn't doubt people doing it in larger stacks though.
@Tiggerous yep. That's recognised as part of what's called the fastest gun in the west problem. Historically it's accepted on the basis it gives people a good answer asap and a better answer later.
@Tiggerous I think it's easy to take this thinking too far, though. Yes, fast answers reap early rewards and that visibility tends to snowball. But there's a knife-edge on the quality spectrum--if you post too fast and are below this threshold the downvotes come fast and hard. It may just be that the location of that threshold is in a different place than you'd expect in print publication.
@Tiggerous I don't think that works. If your answer is mediocre and there's a better answer, your edit bumps the whole question into view, then people check on all the answers. Then your mediocre makes another, actually good and well written, answer look good by comparison and it gets upvotes. Yours looks bad by comparison gets nothing or downvotes. Lots of effort for basically no reward.
@goodguy5 morning! Nice answer on the Kyuss question.
Rules as Common Sense is an interesting viewpoint. I'm not sure I'm fully on board with it because Magic and Common Sense don't necessarily have a 100% overlap, though.
@kviiri It also may be in direct opposition of the rules. Which sounds wrong as I type it, but game rules and real world rules/common sense are often times opposed because of the constraints artificially created by the game designers.
Common sense in this application being less "how does the real world interact with magic" and more "if you were casually talking to someone about the rules in question, what is the most straight forward deduction that you would reach"
Basically: what would our wives /mothers rule in the situation?
(barring anyone who has a super gamer wife or mother)
@goodguy5 unfortunately, our wives/mothers don't know the rulebase. It's easy to say "Oh yeah, I'd do that", but when the rules don't say it it's a different matter.
@NautArch in terms of using common sense ... It is the most logical basis in an illogical game (partial quote from E.G.G. on why AD&D was human centric at its core)
On the other hand, we understand our 'laws of physics' in our reality. Understanding the 'laws of physics/magic/monsters' in the game reality does require that "common sense" be informed by "this is how the {secondary} world works."
I've posted the question I discussed in chat yesterday. I hope I've defined what I mean by 'memorable and exciting' clearly enough. If anyone's reading it and thinks it's awful, let me know, and I'll have the shame delete button handy.
@Tiggerous id love to help but when I ran the adventure he wasn't the final boss (I homebrewed it a little bit) so I didn't do anything to make it hyper-memorable
@goodguy5 Amen to adding HP" is a bandaid at best ... there are some extended discussions at GiTP regarding monsters in D&D 5e being boring "bags of HP" ... not saying I agree with that, but in some cases I think it's a fair criticism.
@Tiggerous You should have him dressed in neon pink with a koala emblazoned on his clothes. Have the party spend a good fifteen minutes discussing what exactly prompted people to call him "The Black Spider".
@Tiggerous The primary limiting factor is stealth. If TBS knows the party is coming he can do lots of stuff (spiders hide, he casts invisibility). If the party sneaks up on him he is toast.
Also I need to not look at what you are talking about at the moment, because I'm still on the hunt for The Black Spider. I think next session is on Saturday. So I'll pop elsewhere for now.
(Yes, it has come to this. I am actually playing D&D.)
@GreySage now I want to use the spider staff to descend into a pit by casting it lower and lower letting the first web disappear and falling into the next
@KorvinStarmast I think your suggestion is a good middle ground, but I think your last paragraph on yesterday's answer (about thinly disguised rants) is also spot-on. I'm more in favor of an outright ban. I'm not sure what the purpose of "tell me why from a designer" really has.
but maybe that's just because as a parent I've found myself saying the dreaded "because I said so" and that's kind of the same thing with an RPG rule. The rule is the rule. Understanding why may be interesting, but it doesn't really help necessarily.
@NautArch It can help. Not saying that it always does... AS you say usually it's a hidden rant. But knowing why a decision was made can help understanding it better, and can help extrapolate it to other different rulings, like "If they did X rule for Y reason... Y reason also stands for Z ruling that I have been doing wrong, it should work that other way", or something like this, less complicated. Me and words...
@Helwar True, bu tthe assumption that the reasoning is the same as something else may not be true. Extrapolating only gets you so far, but the extrapolation may inherently be incorrect. You've still only got one point of reference, and that does not make a line.
My parents took some relatives on a trip to Austin and the line at Franklin's was wrapped around the corner like two hours before the place even opened.
@NautArch Huh. I always turned up 21 towards Caldwell -> College Station/Bryant, so I never got that far up on 77 to trip over Lexington. Next time we are up that way, I may see if the Missus wants to stop at Snow's. She likes good BBQ.
@NautArch as far as I am aware it should only affect the transparent part of my answer right? Which is fine with me because OP only asked about an opaque one.
I'm definitely keeping an eye on things though. I did soften my transparent argument in my answer since it was more of an interesting note than a necessary part of my answer.
@Rubiksmoose more in the lines (get it?) that if darkness has a a line of effect into the sealed jar (which it does if it's transparent), then it would dispel the Light.
@Rubiksmoose It doesn't? The main part is you sayin git wouldn't dispel it, but if the effect goes through the glass to the source of Light, wouldn't it be dispelled?
@NautArch OP asked only about opaque containers. Is there something in my question that would affect that case?
Nothing says that darkness or light penetrates anything honestly. And opaque materials explicitly block it (at least at the source). So not sure I see any issues.
@Rubiksmoose ...and deleted it again :) Read it more carefully and realized they ARE talking about a sealed opaque container. The reason no light is seen in the darkness isn't because of the darkness, though. it's because the Light is contained in an opaque container :)
@goodguy5 unclear if it's an AL league game that utilizes Downtime, unclear if they're referring to the beastmaster ranger, unclear if this is a normal wolf or something else, unclear if there are is any homebrew in here.
@goodguy5 I actually used to be in my youth. I have since seen the ways of the world and, like most "millenials" generally just become disenfranchised with the whole deal.
We even have two different communist parties, but neither has scored any seats in the parliament for as long as I can remember. The anti-Soviet one has some municipal council seats!
Well okay, not really anti-Soviet, but less hardlinerly as the other one.
Okay, I want to make a person who creates poisons and potions. You ask for a strength potion, and they might give you a strength potion, or they could give you a potion of rage. Or you get something with a crushed werewolf tooth in it so you gain strength, but it's because you now have lycanthrop...
Recently I have noticed that the order in which answers are displayed does not necessarily go from highest voted to lowest. It used to, at least for me... maybe a function of privilege change.
Is this now a standard until acceptance?
The reason I ask is that it appears that most people looking ...
I find it really frustrating that they ask what class, then shoot down the most thematic choice for it with no reasoning. What do you want us to tell you if you won't tell us what you want?
@Rubiksmoose I think KorvinStarmast is about to answer in the comments about the poisons in the DMG (or at least hinting at them)... so "that is that" may not be that
We are now accepting playtesters for the upcoming Fate of Cthulhu! Groups with all types of rules experience, fandom and player composition are encouraged to apply. Simply fill out the survey at this link: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdJqxdvW3qmB2hWiUKxKHRIRKeCrOvlLxalOjul_8pmBnEDWg/viewform
Applications close May 7th.