TRPG General Chat

BESW

00:18

One of my friends has been hired as an extra in Hawaii Five-O.

user61230

00:52

They're making new episodes of Hawaii Five-O?

BESW

01:03

Hawaii Five-0

Hawaii Five-0 is an American police procedural drama television series and a remake of the original 1968–80 television series. The series is produced by K/O Paper Products and 101st Street Television in association with CBS Productions, originally an in-name-only unit of but folded into CBS Television Studios, which has produced the series since the beginning of season three. The title of the new show uses a zero instead of the letter "O" in the original title. Hawaii Five-0 debuted on CBS, the same network that aired the original version. Like the original version, it follows an elite state police...

My mother's been watching it and enjoying the parallels and subversions from the original show.

user61230

Wow, who knew.

user61230

...evidently a lot of people.

BESW

VTC unclear until system/edition info, at least.

(It's probably D&D 4e, because that's the system in the other question he's asked, but...)

BESW

02:16

SevenSidedDie

02:50

@BESW Today? Congrats on your millennial!

BESW

@SevenSidedDie Thanks!

Sandwich

03:18

Thousandinneal

SevenSidedDie

@Sandwich Yes. : ) "mille" from the Latin for thousand.

Sandwich

Nice icon edit there SSD

Magician

@BESW My condolences.

SevenSidedDie

@Sandwich The white background is supposed to be transparent, but there seems to be a bug somewhere between my image program and SE's avatar uploader. I decided that wasn't going to slow me down. :)

Sandwich

03:34

It is transparent though

gyazo.com/a8ffccacf9a5f05c0d513419845f1520

I dont see any white there at all

SevenSidedDie

@Sandwich I see white in that link? My normal icon shows the tan through, instead of having a white square background.

Sandwich

If you send me the file I can fix it

SevenSidedDie

This is what it should look like, and does even after uploading, but not after clicking "save...":

(That one shows up with a black background after saving the upload. It looks fine in the upload view before saving.)

Pixie

03:50

@SevenSidedDie Did you make this image, and if so, how did you make it?

Like, what was your process in getting it to be transparent?

SevenSidedDie

@Pixie Yeah, I put it together in the Gimp. I laid my normal avatar set to "multiply" over a pride flag to get the general look, tweaked the saturation on the flag, and duplicated the blue outlines to get the colour back. Looked great until I uploaded it and the transparency was all wacky. :)

Sandwich

What type of file is it Seven

PNG? JPG?

SevenSidedDie

@Sandwich It's a PNG.

Pixie

@SevenSidedDie I think there are some problems that can come up with Gimp specifically, and pngs in general depending on how the program does them. Looking for more information.

SevenSidedDie

@Pixie HMM. I have an old copy too.

Got to go for a bit, but I'll be around later I think.

Sandwich

03:56

i.imgur.com/kzSrhw4.png There you go dude

Pixie

04:07

@SevenSidedDie A potential solution may be changing the image to RGB mode before exporting. May also be something to do with the alpha layer.

doppelgreener

05:01

Nice icon :D

SevenSidedDie

@Sandwich Same problem: somehow it converts to a black background. I suspect there's a regression bug in SE. Probably has something to do with the changes they've been making for the new profile code.

It looks like a bug in SE's image resizing code. This has the error, but get rid of the size parametre in the URL and the transparency comes back.

Back to the hardcoded white background for now...

@Sandwich I appreciate the effort though. :)

@doppelgreener :D

@Pixie No luck. It appears to be a bug on SE's side that is still outstanding or has recently regressed. Doesn't affect gravatar-derived images, because that doesn't go through SE's code, but since it's a temporary change I figured I'd use their uploader...

doppelgreener

05:25

@SevenSidedDie You may wish to open a new Meta.SE bug report suggesting the bug's come back.

SevenSidedDie

@doppelgreener I left a comment on the dev's answer there, so hopefully it will get noticed. A duplicate would probably just get closed to it.

I changed my gravatar instead (I forgot you can have multiple saved, so temporary changes are easy), but now it's waiting on SE's gravatar cache to update!

doppelgreener

@SevenSidedDie I've left bug reports in the past (this one) that say "this is happening, sounds like it might be this old bug" that didn't get closed. I don't think it's common practice to close an unfixed bug (regression or not) as a dupe of a fixed one.

SevenSidedDie

Ahhh, there we go. ...now just to wait for chat's cache to update.

doppelgreener

\o/

Magician

//yawn//

The Three

4d6

Dice Service

05:31

•

Magician

A nasty dive of a tavern; A rope or noose; A traitor or defector; Treacherous, dangerous and ambitious.

doppelgreener

you using the Oracle while i have the fudge dice script enabled here is confusing. [disables]

Magician

There is a rumour you once heard, of a secret scrawled on the inside of the crematorium pits of the Drakenhall. And not just any crematorium, but the one reserved for the worst traitors (however the Three define that). You make a plan. You'll have to betray the Three, which means you'll have to earn their trust. You'll have to be hanged. You'll have to withstand the pyre. It all starts in a tavern...

SevenSidedDie

0

Q: Uploaded profile pictures converts transparency to black

The transparency-related profile-picture bug appears to have regressed. Transparency shows as black with the size parametre in URL: https://i.sstatic.net/6mUws.png?s=128&g=1 Transparency works fine when size parametre is removed: https://i.sstatic.net/6mUws.png (Pleas...

@doppelgreener Thanks for the advice. Done!

doppelgreener

@SevenSidedDie I have just learned that 'parametre' genuinely exists as a variant of 'parameter'

SevenSidedDie

05:39

@doppelgreener My English spelling may be slightly pretentious.

BESW

And not just the word for a sky-diving unit of measure? Cool!

Miniman

@doppelgreener And here I thought it was going to be the most awesome-sounding unit of measurement.

@BESW Dammit, beaten to the punch.

doppelgreener

@SevenSidedDie i'm gonna go with spelling hipster instead

SevenSidedDie

@doppelgreener YES

@doppelgreener Huh, a sharp rise, relatively-speaking, in "parametre" in the 40s, a peak in the 70s, and then a sharp drop-off as the Internet is born. A tiny bump back in the 1860s is the only "historical" precedent too. So it's both retro and faux-retro.

BESW

By contrast...

Pixie

05:45

@SevenSidedDie Ahh, I see! Unfortunate, but at least the mystery is solved.

SevenSidedDie

@BESW Yeah, interesting. So "parametre" is an example of hypercorrection. Neat.

BESW

And now, please enjoy this graph of the word perimetre.

Pixie

The 1870s were a hopping time for perimetre.

BESW

People who liked that graph may also like this one.

SevenSidedDie

@BESW I don't even what's going on there. I wonder why the two near-symmetrical bumps for different capitalisations?

BESW

05:49

@SevenSidedDie Google's ngrams get weird when their sample sizes are tiny.

The smoothing algorithms get bored, I think.

SevenSidedDie

@BESW I am reminded of the neural-network hallucinations article you linked recently.

Sandwich

Hmmm

If thats the case why is my sandwich transparent Seven

Magician

@Sandwich It isn't.

Sandwich

Oh it isnt

What

BESW

@SevenSidedDie Ngrams are fascinating.

SevenSidedDie

05:54

@Sandwich The bug does say "black", but I did get one upload that was white and then couldn't reproduce it. So, probably that. Gravatars not affected, if you want to switch to those.

@BESW Yes!

BESW

I'm not sure why Varney the Vampire gets only one result.

Sandwich

No way man

ILL NEVER DROP MY SANDWICH RAAAGH

Pixie

@BESW One is plenty of Varney.

BESW

But if you just go for Varney, the ngram gets a curious little treble-spike right around that story's publishing.

doppelgreener

@BESW Varney the Vampire is not a name I can take seriously in this day and age.

BESW

06:01

@doppelgreener Varney is not a vampire to be taken seriously in any age.

Pixie

Nor probably to read at all, unless you are very dedicated.

Sandwich

You could just spell something backwards to make a vampire name

Y'enolab the vampire

Pixie

That reminds me, I wish I could watch Penny Dreadful. I'm hoping it makes its way onto Netflix, Hulu, or free Prime eventually.

Sandwich

Nocab the Vampire

H'ciwdnas Krop the Vampire

BESW

@Pixie Penny dreadful ngram!

Pixie

06:14

@BESW Heh. Once they get this year in, I'm sure it'll go up sharply.

Also can't wait for Crimson Peak. I've always been fond of gothic literature as well as del Toro's work.

BESW

Del Toro's definitely got style.

Shalvenay

@BESW -- can you not see that one of your comments has been flagged, or what kind of flag it has on it? I was kind of expecting me flagging your last comment on my latest question as obsolete as being a cue to flag my last two comments on that question as obsolete too :)

BESW

Only elected moderators see comment flags, and unless you use a custom flag they're not likely to go vetting comments that haven't specifically been flagged.

....also you can delete your own comments, so there's no reason to bug a mod about them.

Shalvenay

oh :)

I keep forgetting that. :P

Pixie

@BESW The trailer for this one looks like a perfect distillation of a gothic romance, too. I almost wish it played coyer with the supernatural elements, but that's what's going to sell it, so I cannot blame it either. xD

doppelgreener

06:23

@Shalvenay the only flags you'll ever see, unless you're a mod, are those in your own flag summary

Shalvenay

right

Ben

Evenin all

doppelgreener

GOOD EVENING!

BESW

@Pixie Just watched the trailer, and some of the setpieces gave me distinct Event Horizon vibes.

Ben

@doppelgreener Energetic

Pixie

06:28

@BESW Ah, interesting. I haven't seen that one.

BESW

@Pixie Sadly it gets a bit fuzzy on the edges in the third act, but the setup is superb.

I think Ebert got it right: "The script creates a sense of foreboding and afterboding, but no actual boding."

Pixie

Heh.

BESW

Even I, who find it really hard to locate horror films that I can actually sit through, found its denouement kinda lackluster and jump-scare-y.

trogdor

I hate jump scares

Magician

@trogdor BOO

trogdor

06:34

they are the cheapest ****

Pixie

I tolerate horror much better than I used to. It's slowly become a strong interest.

BESW

But the setup, oh man. Some people consider Event Horizon a precursor to Doom.

trogdor

yeah sorry, but they don't work in text form,.. in point of fact I have trouble finding anything written that actually scares me

Pixie

I've probably sat through worse for smaller virtues. Scratch that, I know I have. :P

BESW

@Pixie I'm intellectually fascinated by the genre, but I hate the actual scaring bits.

trogdor

06:35

not to say I don't like horror, I loved movies like Alien, and shows like X Files

Pixie

@trogdor Written horror rarely ever scared me, even as a child, which is probably why I love horror fiction as much as I do. :P Movies, on the other hand...

BESW

There's a very delicate balance of dread/horror that I really like. Body horror and gore, though, I run from.

trogdor

jump scares are just dumb is all

BESW

Unfortunately Event Horizon does a LOT of body horror toward the end, but does it poorly.

trogdor

they mean you couldn't manage to scare someone with other tactics, especially when they are used anything other than extremely sparingly.

BESW

06:36

So I'm discomfited for no particular worthwhile result.

Pixie

I really have few issues with body horror and can tolerate surprising amounts of gore, but I'm not fond of them, either.

trogdor

body horror isn't entirely my thing either

Shalvenay

body horror?

as in "wait, where'd that dead body come from?"

trogdor

no

Pixie

But when I was younger, I could not watch horror movies. I couldn't do it. I'd spend all night with my anxiety levels through the roof if I caught even the slightest glimpse of the wrong scene. I never thought I'd be able to handle them.

trogdor

06:38

as in, horrific, torturous, and or really gross things happening to your body

Shalvenay

aaaah

BESW

@Shalvenay Mutilation, disfigurement, parasitism--anything where the scare comes from something unpleasant being done to a body without the focus being on an immediate act of violence.

@Pixie Ditto.

Shalvenay

yeah...I tend to bypass a lot of that from the written-word side -- comes with engaging with a world through its details

Pixie

I'm much more comfortable with certain types of body horror than I am others, though. Bizarre body changes (like Uzumaki) don't bother me. Mutilation on screen is highly unpleasant. I think I'm actually more squeamish about gory bits and prolonged torment than I used to be.

trogdor

Body Horror, in fact would be harder to at least some small degree to pull off if the body was literally just a body

Shalvenay

06:42

massive gore isn't really my thing though

I don't think bizarre body changes would bother me too much though

probably not at all really

Pixie

But when I was around... 13, I think? My friend was watching a Friday the 13th sequel while I was staying over, and I decided for her sake I'd give it a shot, especially since I had someone else with me. Being alone at night always multiplied the fear considerably. To my surprise, I tolerated it pretty well. From that point on, I could be more adventurous.

There are movies that I will never actually be able to watch, though, because of childhood exposure. The Halloween franchise is the main one.

Shalvenay

I think that the biggest thing that'd bother me with most horror is panicked, illogical protagonists

Pixie

That is distracting at times.

trogdor

I do hate that when it is overblown

Shalvenay

I would love to see Jason Voorhees run into a swordmaiden :P

trogdor

06:49

to a certain degree it can make sense, you don't think entirely straight when you are scared half to death

doppelgreener

@Shalvenay imgur.com/gallery/r8a33tX

trogdor

but sometimes a protagonist just does the dumbest thing possible and it makes no sense

Shalvenay

@doppelgreener LOL

@trogdor -- a lot of it is the "leaving no outs" part

trogdor

and it goes beyond the explanation of genere blindness

Shalvenay

genre blindness bugs me tremendously too

trogdor

06:51

@Shalvenay how do you mean?

Shalvenay

@trogdor -- characters who let themselves get cornered with no options

Pixie

@trogdor Yeah. There are certainly ways to pull it off, and it's entirely reasonable and logical that normal people who are terrified of something are not going to react optimally or make the best decisions.

trogdor

like they do something they really can't take back? like hiding somewhere where there is only one entrance/exit?

Shalvenay

@trogdor -- exactly

Pixie

Still, movies are crafted scenarios, and fiction's job is rarely to portray life exactly as it is.

trogdor

06:52

@Shalvenay ok, that was what I thought

Shalvenay

at that point, as an antagonist, out come the flasks of flammable fuel and the fire-starting materials

one exit? enjoy sharing that one exit with a fire, fool.

because if there's anything that gets me, it's fire.

(when it comes to scaring the living daylights out of me)

Pixie

Well, most people aren't prepared to be attacked by murderers or animals or supernatural forces at all times. Additionally, often the setup is either the character missing or overlooking important details because (from the perspective of life-as-usual) they're not important or especially suspicious, or they're easily rationalized. People rationalize things all the time. Then, when things become immediately, obviously wrong, the characters aren't equipped to deal with them or are in too deep.

trogdor

that is the reason a lot of people rag on the particular scene in Prometheus, (as well as other parts) where one of the characters decides to run forward when stepping to the side would easily be a better choice

in fact, 2 characters do it, but at least one realizes it was a dumb idea before death happens and grows a brain

just trying to say it in a non spoiler-y way in case someone somehow wants to see that movie and hasn't yet

Pixie

With fiction, although it would be reasonable and understandable for people to behave that way, we can't help but judge it from our position as all-seeing eye. It can be frustrating to see things happen purely because the character made an illogical decision when the logical one is so obvious to the viewer.

trogdor

I think part of it is that not enough effort, or possibly skill in some cases, is put into showing why people make these decisions sometimes

not that it is entirely possible every time, but sometimes it seems the character in question in any particular instance could have made any other choice, or that maybe some small explanation is in order for some choices

Pixie

07:09

Yeah. That's why I talk about the setup. If that setup is organic, if it feels like the culmination of interlocking factors rather than hapless chance, then it's easier to swallow.

trogdor

and in that scene I mentioned, there were 2 people making the same mistake and one realized it, but the other didn't even after an example was made as to the obviously better idea

that is part of the reason I personally hate that scene

the rest of the movie before it didn't do any favors to my state of mind either

Pixie

I'd have to actually see it in order to judge.

trogdor

it is rife with examples of people doing the dumbest thing possible

if you want to, just be warned that I am definitely not the only person by far who thought it was a stupid movie

and you might not want to see it before you see Alien movie, and maybe the ones after it

doppelgreener

@trogdor that and playing games first-hand vs spectating makes it really clear there is a big difference between decisions you can make from the sidelines and decisions you can make while you're right there

trogdor

but the third and fourth ones are not exactly entirely liked either

doppelgreener

07:15

e.g. just watching someone play a horror game

Pixie

The other thing is that, again, because a film is a crafted scenario, sometimes decisions are made purely because it's the path of least resistance to a desired outcome, whether or not it's actually been set up. It didn't happen because it made sense that it might or because it needed to. It happened because the thing after needed to happen. When that makes itself obvious and pushes beyond a viewer's suspension of disbelief, it tends to be more frustrating.

trogdor

@doppelgreener this is all true, but for example, the few Horror games I have played and the relatively many I have watched other people play,.... no one does something as dumb as running forward more than they have to when they are running something that is so obviously going to kill them unless they take some turn somewhere

and they definitely don't do it when someone else, either another player or an NPC, shows them the example of what they should be doing

Pixie

Well, sometimes when you're terrified, you don't register that kind of thing.

trogdor

I have the example of when I played F.E.A.R, I think it was the first one but it could have been 2

Pixie

One time I got stung by a wasp on the porch. I was right next to the door. Instead of going inside, I ran all the way down the porch stairs, into the garage, and up the inside stairs.

trogdor

07:19

I did do something stupid in that, when I was randomly transported to some really bloody/gross/scary room

possibly it was just a halucination of the character or whatever

but I kept shooting things.. and it obviously wasn't helping

but there literally was nowhere to run or anything

so I do know that you can do some unreasonable things if you at least can't think of other options

Pixie

I can't remember if that was the first or second time I got stung, but it's few and far between that it happens (actually, I've only been stung twice in my life), and I wasn't expecting it either time. I was suddenly in intense pain, and there was a thing I needed to get away from! Now!

trogdor

and I am a bit of a pansy when it comes to video game horror

makes sense

Pixie

@trogdor Well, like @doppelgreener said, there's a big difference between the detached viewership of a movie and engaging with something directly.

doppelgreener

abject terror kinda uh

screws with clear thinking

in a way

a whole lot

trogdor

yeah, it's just, I was not constantly making those kinds of mistakes in horror, it does happen, but my god

I just can't see how some things seem like a good idea JUST because of the fact that you are scared

in many cases, what I get upset over is the fact that said character had a little too much time to think of something else to do, or had a little too much space between them and some bad thing and decided to get CLOSER to it when they know it is there

Pixie

07:26

Sometimes it overrides your ability to think at all, and by the time you can, you've made mistakes that you have to struggle to correct while your fight or flight instinct (whichever is relevant) and anxiety levels are still raging and the danger is still present. Add something like the character already being in pain, not being familiar with the environment, or conditions being inhospitable (wet and slick, dark, etc.), you have a recipe for terrible decisions.

@trogdor Heh, yeah.

I was watching a really bad found footage thing about the Bell Witch recently and there was a lot of pretty shaky behavior, on the part of almost everyone involved. Also bad acting.

trogdor

I can understand running when you should be fighting. for example, but if you got away briefly and have SOME kind of improvised weapon nearby you can pick up, especially if you made the more or less understandable mistake of getting into a corner, you would pick that up out of desperation

it is called fight or flight for a reason

it might not save you, but it is something you would at least likely try after other options are visibly exhausted enough

Pixie

But sometimes despair has a chance to take over, in that case, or you're simply too rattled to think that far. I'm not saying it's a good narrative choice, necessarily, but potentially justifiable.

trogdor

my main complaint is that people doing something dumb is not in itself bad, but a little too much of it can happen

especially if it is the same character constantly choosing to do the wrong things with some decent time to think of other things

Pixie

Yeah. Again, fiction's job is rarely to precisely mirror life, and just because something can happen doesn't mean that, in your constructed narrative, it should.

trogdor

and I do admit, part of my dislike of it might very easily come from the fact that I am more detached than the person making the mistake, but I think that at least in some cases, the actions a character takes are just a little more irrational than they should be

and I also think it might be a slightly over used trope

sometimes the horror could come from a character doing the right thing, but that thing ending up not mattering anyway, for example

and that is done, but I just don't think I see alternative options like that being used enough

it IS, after all, a story

Pixie

07:43

That "path of least resistance" to desired outcomes comes into play often, and I think there's a natural tendency for viewers to desire active characters as well, even if they're not competent. If you get emotionally invested in a character, you'd like them to survive (hence to fight and do the best they can in their circumstances). If they repeatedly refuse, you might not be emotionally invested in them anymore.

trogdor

making a character competent without their competency mattering enough, (because horror story) is a route that could be used more often

@Pixie yeah, I think this is pretty accurate

if you are putting a character in a lot of danger, or even killing them off, you don't have to always do it in a way that makes them look real dumb

Pixie

And in the case of an incompetent character, if we can at least see and understand the factors that are making them less competent, the efforts they do make may be more appreciable.

trogdor

yeah

Pixie

Heh. I've been listening to a song about glasses a lot lately because I'm happy I got new glasses, but over on the side, Youtube is suggesting "Sticker shock: why are glasses so expensive?" Now I remember how much the darn things cost.

trogdor

XD

they can be pretty expensive

Pixie

07:48

I should have just gotten one pair, but they had so many good ones this time, so I got two. >_> Usually I have to go to three stores to find even one pair. xD

trogdor

two is a good number though

Pixie

I've never actually had two pairs at once, and I'm struggling to figure out whether they got the prescription wrong on one or whether it's just going back and forth between shapes that's throwing me off. I'll need to get them checked, I think.

trogdor

If I was not in the habit of having a spare, I would have had some issues a few times

that does sound like a difference in prescription

I still remember the first time I changed prescription being the weirdest thing I have ever experienced

Pixie

Oh, I just had my eyes checked. My prescription (hopefully) isn't in question. I'm just not sure they got both lenses right. They've messed them up before.

There's always a period where new glasses make everything look weird, though, so I'm trying to get through that before heading back to the store. xD

trogdor

to be fair, my life might just not be weird enough, but that was quite an experience to say the least

@Pixie my point is that if one is wrong, the wrongness wouldn't be the only factor

Pixie

07:53

Yeah. Things never look right at first.

trogdor

just the fact that you are trying to get used to two different prescriptions off of one you already are used to could factor in

Pixie

True.

trogdor

of course, that isn't to discount the problem of a wrong prescription by itself, I just mean that it could be further evidence that one of them is wrong

getting it checked seems like a good idea

Pixie

Oh, heck. I've been wearing the pair that seemed more right at first for a few days, and now I've put the other pair on to look again. There's no way this pair is right. xD

trogdor

yeah, it should be pretty easy to tell under those conditions

Pixie

07:58

One pair magnifies things more at a distance. Its effect on my depth perception is more extreme.

Zachiel

09:16

Hey @Trogdor

trogdor

hello

Zachiel

I'm DMing 4e and one of the players came up with a charger thief, whose attack bonus is (almost conssistently) +21 at level 8. I'm not really sure that thing about tax feats is right, since monster AC at that level is around 22.

trogdor

tax feats? like as in needing to pay too many feats to get a payoff or something?

Zachiel

As in "everyone must take this feat in order to be effective", with the usual feat being a weapon expertise

trogdor

anyway, building a charge character, especially like a rogue pixie, is a pretty good way of getting really good attack bonuses, so I am not especially surprised

Zachiel

09:19

While I feel like some characters have to take it, some others... I mean, when your class gives you a +1 bonus to weapons with +3 proficiency...

trogdor

but I am not sure if I knew it was possible to get a +21 to hit at lvl 8

part of it is that really light weapons do already have a really good bonus to hit

is this PC a pixie? cause that is one of the pretty exceptionally powerful ways to build a charge rogue or something similar

Zachiel

Human. +6 ability +4 half level +3 proficiency +1 class feature +1 charge +1 charge feat +2 combat advantage (which he gets on isolated enemies) +1 expertise feat +2 weapon

And like 3 extra d8 on every sneak attack charge, and a wizard moving enemies away.

trogdor

rogues (and thieves and such) are pretty good at that kind of thing

massive to hit and pretty good single target damage, with the right feats and such

was there a question, or did you just want to mention it?

BESW was my DM for my 4E time, and he did find he had to tweak encounters because of the optimization's many of the players had

Zachiel

Sort of a question. Maybe I'll stat it for the main site later.

trogdor

especially at later levels, but probably a little bit at lower levels too

Zachiel

09:28

Unfortunately there's this "if you want to work with the pre-statted monsters, no tactics will be enough on your part" attitude

see you later

trogdor

they did put what is most likely a little too much power in the hands of the PC's in 4E, I think

BESW, if I recall, found some site or other that had better monster health to hit and defences per level

but I don't remember what that was

of course, there were also a couple of pre made encounters that were ridiculous for their level, especially lower level ones, but that is a lesser issue.

doppelgreener

11:21

stargate SG-1

woman gets up right after childbirth, walks around with her child

samantha: shouldn't you be resting? daniel, shouldn't she be resting?

woman: i'm fine!

(i sure hope this might be a plot point or that all of my worldly knowledge has misled me as to why she WOULDN'T just be up and walking)

trogdor

11:38

what episode are you on?

just curious

doppelgreener

@trogdor Brief Candle

trogdor

ah, that one

without spoiling it, I will say that you will have that explained to you

doppelgreener

i think i have

trogdor

mk

it is a strange episode, not one of my personal favorites, but I didn't hate it as much as some

doppelgreener

it is

BESW

22:12

You will never have enough coffee, but you must never stop trying your best.

Tweeted by rstevens on June 28, 2015 at 1:25 PM

BESW

23:34

Pool noodle tentacles. Might be useful for LARPers?

4

Transcript for