last day (15 days later) » 

22:37
Hi, Adeek
@Adeek
I like your thinking on this topic
hey @ShineOnYouCrazyDiamond
Let me open up a whiteboard
thank you I really like to capture ideas in its most root essense.
joined
22:40
See here:
In category theory, a branch of mathematics, a pullback (also called a fiber product, fibre product, fibered product or Cartesian square) is the limit of a diagram consisting of two morphisms f : X → Z and g : Y → Z with a common codomain. The pullback is often written P = X ×Z Yand comes equipped with two natural morphisms P → X and P → Y. The pullback of two morphisms f and g need not exist, but if it does, it is essentially uniquely defined by the two morphisms. In many situations, X ×Z Y may intuitively be thought of as consisting of pairs of elements (x,y) with x∈X and y∈Y and f(x) = g...
yes
?
you defined n --> m iff n divides m
this means that p divides x and p divides y
$\gcd(x,y) \mid x,y$ and whenever $n \mid x,y$, $\gcd(x,y)$
since x divides
xy
yes
exactly
22:45
Okay but $\gcd(x,y) \mid t$ the test object where $t \mid x, y$
Not $t \mid \gcd(x,y)$
Oh, nvm
I have that reversed
So yes, the pullback of two morphisms equals the coproduct then?
@Adeek do you have an MSE post going?
I'd be happy to comment on it
Adeek, have you seen the paper "Groupoids and stuff"?
There you can see they work with finite groupoids
And has some interesting relation to discrete problems
yes
cool @ShineOnYouCrazyDiamond I will check it
What else can you say about the category of integers?
Their objects form a monoid under $\cdot$
I mean $\text{LCM}$
yes
What is $+$
then
$x + y$ is an object but categorically what is it
categorically it a morphism on the product
22:53
If $x \to d, y \to d$
on the product of two objects
I mean if $d \mid x, d \mid y$, then $d \mid x + y$
$x \rightarrow d$ and $y \rightarrow d$ then x | d and y | d.
sorry $d | x$ and $d | y$
so $d | x + y$
Yes, so that is a ?
what is + ?
categorically ?
it would be coproduct actually
it would be coproduct of x and y
But there's no $x \to x + y$
necc.
hm
I think it's actually a limit
it is probably the colimit
22:58
Draw on paper:
because of how we defined
It's confusing
In category theory, a branch of mathematics, the abstract notion of a limit captures the essential properties of universal constructions such as products, pullbacks and inverse limits. The dual notion of a colimit generalizes constructions such as disjoint unions, direct sums, coproducts, pushouts and direct limits. Limits and colimits, like the strongly related notions of universal properties and adjoint functors, exist at a high level of abstraction. In order to understand them, it is helpful to first study the specific examples these concepts are meant to generalize. == Definition == Limits...
I would change objects over to ideals
$\text{Ob}(C) = \{ (n) : n \in \Bbb{Z} \}$
And arrows are pretty much the same thing
Because there is a $\Bbb{Z}$-module hom
from $(n) \to (m)$ if $n \mid m$
yes
Then the limit is
the limit would be addition yes
23:05
Not sure
show me
$(n) \xrightarrow{a} (m)$
$(k) \xrightarrow{b} (m)$
1 sec let me get my tablet
no no
I think limits is the prime numbers
@ShineOnYouCrazyDiamond you here?
yes 1 sec I did it in my head
I think limits is the set of prime divisors of
a and b
Yeah it is very interesting
23:16
For what functor?
In the article, they say to make a cocone you have to pick a functor first
$F: J \to C$
oh no I mean direct limit
let me see your article
oh I see
In category theory, a branch of mathematics, the abstract notion of a limit captures the essential properties of universal constructions such as products, pullbacks and inverse limits. The dual notion of a colimit generalizes constructions such as disjoint unions, direct sums, coproducts, pushouts and direct limits. Limits and colimits, like the strongly related notions of universal properties and adjoint functors, exist at a high level of abstraction. In order to understand them, it is helpful to first study the specific examples these concepts are meant to generalize. == Definition == Limits...
let me see what functor you have to pick
Identity functor maybe
I think lcm
no lcm ?
if you want to get the prime decomposition
of both
a and b it would be lcm
the identity functor for 1 integer
this is very very interesting
23:30
@ShineOnYouCrazyDiamond I have to go to get groceriescan you tell me when
I think it is the limit
under certain functor
if I had to guess
the functor would be lcm of a,b
no no
Might be, it would be nice to have a program that you just plug the objects / arrows into and it answers these questions for you
gcd(a,b)
yeah
I think it the functor of gcd(a,b)
I am pretty sure
Can you solve
$x^{2^k} = 1 \pmod {q_i}$
for the first few odd primes $q_i, \dots, q_r$ and then $x^{2^k} \neq 1$ for the rest?
yeah
23:33
I think there was a theorem for this
CRT doesn't work with powers
chinese remaindering
I've looked at the exponent lifting lemma as well
yeah
If you solve it, ie prove that infinitely many $x$ exist regardless of what the $q_i$ are excep they're prime and $\leq k+1$ in count
Then it implies Twin Primes
@ShineOnYouCrazyDiamond are you a grad student in algebra ?
No, just alone at parents house
23:34
high school ?
undergrad?
I just came out of my father's womb the other day
I'm an aliean
seriously :D
^_^
Algebros before hoes
23:35
I love hoes man what can I do
hahaha
I'm actually a parasite that only studies math
I took over my hosts body 15 years ago
I look human because my host is
I love math and girls
You love curves and XXX
:D
$X^3$
I wish I could remove my love for girls then I would just focus on thinking instead of xxx without love of curves
hahahaha
I love them x^3
hahaha
How many shits does a regular mathematician give?
Infinitely many because they're a log-a-rhythm
23:38
hahahah
I am gonna use it that as one of my pick up lines
because of my love of xxx
haha
It actually goes "what do you call a regular mathematician"
a log-a-rhythm
Either way though
yoo
do you have email or contacts I study geometry at grad level
let us chat sometime
23:41
okay copied
wish me luck on my love of curves :D
hahahah
I have a book on Schemes
which book ?
Hartshorne ?
Gortz and Wedhord
*Wedhorn
never heard of it
i will add it to my reading list
Want it?
I can send it
23:43
sure send it
K sent.
Would you like to study it together?
yes
let us do it
As a group session sort of thing
It starts out too advanced for my friend Ultradark
But maybe you can handle it?
it is ok
yes
I made a thesis on scheme theory
98 pages
Whoah crap
That's amazing
23:45
are you a girl :D ?
I'm a newbie at it
No
oh man I would have loved it if you were a girl :D
I love women
lol that would be the day.
Nah, they all ran scurt
scurd of math
that would be the day math and girls ?
**** girls are stupid
No, that's not true
23:46
I want mathematician girl or something smart
I can't find a smart girl
let us meet next Saturday ?
Let us discuss first two chapters
maybe first 1/2 chapter
lol
okay
Algebros be for hoes
23:52
yes
alright ciao

last day (15 days later) »