« first day (3019 days earlier)      last day (892 days later) » 

12:19 PM
The dead link in the question about proofs of Tychonoff's theorem was removed by the OP. Other links to univ-lorraine.fr/~Pierre-Yves.Gaillard might be dead, too.
4
Q: Endomorphisms of free modules and extension of scalars

Pierre-Yves GaillardI asked this question on Mathematics Stackexchange, but got no answer. Let $B$ be a commutative ring with $1$, let $A$ be a subring such that any unit of $B$ which belongs to $A$ is a unit of $A$, and let $\phi:F\to F$ be an endomorphism of a free $A$-modules $F$ such that $B\otimes_A\phi:B\otim...

4
A: Examples of common false beliefs in mathematics

Pierre-Yves GaillardHere are two beliefs. I think everybody will agree that one of them, at least, is false. I adhere to the second one. Belief 1. The simplest way to compute the exponential $e^A$ of a complex square matrix $A$ is to use the Jordan decomposition. Belief 2. It's simpler and more efficient to use t...

6
A: Examples of common false beliefs in mathematics

Pierre-Yves GaillardHere are two beliefs. I think everybody will agree that one of them, at least, is false. I adhere to the second one. Belief 1. There is no simple generalization of the Hodge Theorem to noncompact manifolds. Belief 2. The most naive statement which would, if true, generalize the Hodge Theorem ...

10
A: Galois theory timeline

Pierre-Yves GaillardEDIT. Here is the part of the answer that has been rewritten: We give below a short proof of the Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory (FTGT) for finite degree extensions. We derive the FTGT from two statements, denoted (a) and (b). These two statements, and the way they are proved here, go back ...

2
A: Subset of the plane that intersects every line exactly twice

Pierre-Yves GaillardHere is a minor variation of the proof. We show that there is a subset $Z$ of $\mathbb R^2$ which intersects each line exactly twice. We define the ordinals in such a way that each ordinal $a$ is the set of those ordinals $< a$. For any set $S$ we write $|S|$ for the least ordinal equipotent to...

13
A: Is $h^{0,k}$ a topological invariant?

Francesco PolizziThe answer is no. There are counterexamples already for surfaces, due to X. Gang and F. Campana (unpublished). The link to Campana's article is here, and the relevant result is Proposition 0.1 Il existe des surfaces projectives complexes $S$, $S_0$ simplement connexes et de type général ho...

There are also three comments with such links: data.stackexchange.com/mathoverflow/query/1451220/…
The link in the post is dead again. I suppose the new link might be iecl.univ-lorraine.fr/~Pierre-Yves.Gaillard/DIVERS/… Just in case, I am also adding Internet Archive snapshot. — Martin Sleziak Jan 4 '18 at 7:35
You may want to take a look at this text. Thanks for letting me know of you catch other typos. — Pierre-Yves Gaillard May 6 '14 at 4:05
 
 
3 hours later…
3:31 PM
The link to iecl.univ-lorraine.fr/~Pierre-Yves.Gaillard/DIVERS/Tycho seems to be dead - I guess you're in the best position to say whether the same text is now available somewhere else. (The springerlink links do not work either - but that's basically a non-issue, since the title of the paper is explicitly mentioned.) — Martin Sleziak 8 hours ago
@MartinSleziak - Thanks! I removed the link because it was just a repetition of the argument given in the question. — Pierre-Yves Gaillard 3 hours ago
 

« first day (3019 days earlier)      last day (892 days later) »