« first day (2982 days earlier)      last day (929 days later) » 

5:55 AM
In case somebody wants to check how many old posts have been bumped recently, I typically use something like created:2009-01-01..2021-01-01.
In fact, it seems that the first date is not needed.
 
 
3 hours later…
9:02 AM
Just wondering if this could be confirmed

> http://front.math.ucdavis.edu/9511.5111 (ADDED: this might be Seidel's 𝜋1 of symplectic automorphism groups and invertibles in quantum homology rings, https://arxiv.org/abs/dg-ga/9511011)
Taken from this answer: mathoverflow.net/a/281793/4177
If we can rule out any other possible options, then I can delete the arXiv front link, and clear it from the search results.
 
 
3 hours later…
11:47 AM
17
A: Does every smooth, projective morphism to $\mathbb{C}P^1$ admit a section?

eigenbunnyYes, using some symplectic geometry. Let's say we had $X \subset {\mathbb C}P^n \times {\mathbb C}P^1$, with projection to $\mathbb{C} P^1$ a smooth morphism (meaning, for topologists, a proper holomorphic submersion; all fibres are smooth). With the restriction of the standard Kaehler form, this...

I think I found the new link for the first reference, can you confirm? — David Roberts yesterday
The fact that this user didn't do any action since 2017 does not seem optimistic: stackexchange.com/users/9011889/eigenbunny?tab=activity
LastAccessDate is also shown in 2017: main, meta.
 
 
3 hours later…
3:12 PM
When trying SEDE, I only found one instance where this string was removed: mathoverflow.net/posts/302398/revisions mathoverflow.net/review/suggested-edits/143105
The link math.dartmouth.edu/~euler/pages/E530.html is very likely supposed to be scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/euler-works/530 - I am not sure whether I should just comment or whether it is better to edit the post (and maybe include also the title). It is from this answer: Most interesting mathematics mistake?
 
3:33 PM
Would somebody be able to guess the link here: However, recently a counter-example was found by Neeman and Deligne: springerlink.com/content/aeem2yx884nnufxn mathoverflow.net/questions/879/…
70
A: Most interesting mathematics mistake?

the LIt was "proved" in 1961 that the first right derived functor, $\lim^1_{\leftarrow}$ of the inverse limit functor is zero on Mittag-Leffler systems. However, recently a counter-example was found by Neeman and Deligne: http://www.springerlink.com/content/aeem2yx884nnufxn/

Possibly the links to math.berkeley.edu/~stall might be all dead. I have added a Wayback Machine link here: mathoverflow.net/posts/9029/revisions
 

« first day (2982 days earlier)      last day (929 days later) »