« first day (2416 days earlier)      last day (1495 days later) » 

4:28 AM
A new tag was created.
In knot theory, a branch of topology, a Brunnian link is a nontrivial link that becomes a set of trivial unlinked circles if any one component is removed. In other words, cutting any loop frees all the other loops (so that no two loops can be directly linked). The name Brunnian is after Hermann Brunn. Brunn's 1892 article Über Verkettung included examples of such links. == Examples == The best-known and simplest possible Brunnian link is the Borromean rings, a link of three unknots. However for every number three or above, there are an infinite number of links with the Brunnian proper...
1
Q: Rigid Brunnian links for $n \geq 4$

David G. StorkBrunnian links consist of $n$ linked un-knot components such that the cutting of any component leaves all components unconnected. The most famous example is the three-component Borromean rings (or links). In 1954 Milnor classified all Brunnian links up to link homotopy. In $\mathbb{R}^3$, it ...

What would be a suitable top-level tag for Rigid Brunnian links for $n \geq 4$? Perhaps ? (The tag-info mentions knot theory.)
> Topology of cell complexes and manifolds, classification of manifolds (e.g. smoothing, surgery), low dimensional topology (e.g. knot theory, invariants of 4-manifolds), embedding theory, combinatorial and PL topology, geometric group theory, infinite dimensional topology (e.g. Hilbert cube manifolds, theory of retracts).
 
 
1 hour later…
5:41 AM
@MartinSleziak The question was retagged by David Roberts (Thanks!): mathoverflow.net/posts/356380/revisions It now has a top-level tag, the tag was added.
The question whether there is a difference between and still remains, but that's a question for people who know more about this topic than I do.
1
Q: A question about subobjects of the unit in a rigid abelian tensor category

Lao-tzuI have a question about Proposition 1.17 in Deligne and Milne, Tannakian Categories (see here), in the last 4 lines of the proof. I don't why it follows from $U\otimes U\simeq U$ that $T=\ker(U\to U^\vee\otimes U)=0$ (or the largest subobject $T$ of $U$ such that $T\otimes U=0$ is $0$). Even ...

 
 
2 hours later…
7:23 AM
@MartinSleziak The tag was added by YCor. At the same time, was changed to .
2
Q: Rigid Brunnian links for $n \geq 4$

David G. StorkBrunnian links consist of $n$ linked un-knot components such that the cutting of any component leaves all components unconnected. The most famous example is the three-component Borromean rings (or links). In 1954 Milnor classified all Brunnian links up to link homotopy. In $\mathbb{R}^3$, it ...

@MartinSleziak The tag was removed from that question: mathoverflow.net/posts/356380/revisions The edit summary says: "removed new tag (redundant to monoidal-categories)".
I see that "Mathematical applications of quantum field theory" was bumped. Maybe adding would be useful?
59
Q: Mathematical applications of quantum field theory

SarahI understand that quantum field theories are interesting as physics; however, there is also a large community of mathematicians who are interested in them. For someone who is not at all interested in physics, what are some compelling mathematical applications of this work? I've search for such ...

 
 
6 hours later…
1:58 PM
@MartinSleziak has no tag info. This very question (which I find somewhat vague) seems to ask applications of something in physics in maths. I don't know if it fits. Adding the tag seems harmless at first sight. Certainly should be added as top-level tag.
 

« first day (2416 days earlier)      last day (1495 days later) »