6:03 AM
6:38 AM
10
Consider some positive non-integer $\beta$ and a non-negative integer $p$. Does anyone have any idea how to show that the determinant of the following matrix is non-zero? $$ \begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{\beta + 1} & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{3} & \dots & \frac{1}{p+1}\\ \frac{1}{\beta + 2} & \frac{1}{3} &...
This may be a generalized Hilbert matrix. Maybe math.univ-lille1.fr/~otrt/otrt/Aleman.pdf will help. If not, anyway, I've given you a search term. — Gerry Myerson yesterday
I suppose that the title would be too big even with smallmatrix: $\det\left(\begin{smallmatrix}
\frac{1}{\beta + 1} & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{3} & \dots & \frac{1}{p+1}\\
\frac{1}{\beta + 2} & \frac{1}{3} & \frac{1}{4} & \dots & \frac{1}{p+2}\\
\frac{1}{\beta + 3} & \frac{1}{4} & \frac{1}{5} & \dots & \frac{1}{p+3}\\
\vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \dots & \vdots \\
\frac{1}{\beta + p + 1} & \frac{1}{p+2} & \frac{1}{p+3} & \dots & \frac{1}{2p+1}
\end{smallmatrix}\right)$
\frac{1}{\beta + 1} & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{3} & \dots & \frac{1}{p+1}\\
\frac{1}{\beta + 2} & \frac{1}{3} & \frac{1}{4} & \dots & \frac{1}{p+2}\\
\frac{1}{\beta + 3} & \frac{1}{4} & \frac{1}{5} & \dots & \frac{1}{p+3}\\
\vdots & \vdots & \vdots & \dots & \vdots \\
\frac{1}{\beta + p + 1} & \frac{1}{p+2} & \frac{1}{p+3} & \dots & \frac{1}{2p+1}
\end{smallmatrix}\right)$
Hilbert matrix was mentioned in the comments. Maybe "generalized Hilbert matrix" or "Hilbert matrix with a parameter" or something like that?
If you wanted to add MathJax, that will push the question out of the HNQ list - I am not sure whether MO community sees that as a positive or as a negative thing.
titles Does somebody have more suggestions how to improve the title here: How to prove a certain determinant is non-zero.
@YuiToCheng I wrote above what I was able to think of, but I do not have some really good suggestion.
in CRUDE, Mar 18 '16 at 13:20, by Daniel Fischer
@MartinSleziak In titles (also elsewhere),
\begin{smallmatrix} … \end{smallmatrix}
is quite useful. With that, $3\times 3$ matrices in titles are acceptable. (But if you can make an informative title without a matrix, that's probably better, since even a smallmatrix
takes much vertical space at $3\times 3$.)7:26 AM
7:50 AM
There were several discussions related to HNQs, I have linked to some of them here: meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/linked/4274
Such as: The Association Bonus, Measures to separate math overflow from the rest of the stack exchange network, Traffic from the list of hot network questions and Featured MO questions on the hot list: what benefits, if any, do these bring?
My impression from those discussions was that non-negligible part of users do not like MO questions in the HNQ list. (Although the primary concern is probably drive-by voting.)
OTOH, in many cases there are suitable titles which include MathJax - which would prevent the question from entering HNQ. As far as I can tell, I do not see such edits on MO very often.
Here are some SEDE queries: data.stackexchange.com/mathoverflow/query/1075210/… data.stackexchange.com/mathoverflow/query/1223619/…
@YuiToCheng The pending edit on that question was approved, so now it should be possible to edit the question (including possible improvements to the title).
8:45 AM
« first day (2436 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (1474 days later) »
Transcript for
Apr22
Apr '2023
Apr24
MO editors' lounge
Talk related to editing, tagging and related matters for the s...