I thought I have seen also example with http where the picture wasn't hosted on stack.imgur.com. But I can't find it right now.
@Glorfindel Sorry for bothering you, but I guess this is something you might know about.
Did I remember correctly that Stack Exchange posted an information that images with http rather than https are no longer supposed to work? Or did I misremember it?
In case as above - where there is a picture with http rather than https - is there something that has to be done with such posts.
I thought I have seen also some edits by yourself changing http to https, but my memory might be fooling me.
It seems that I am responsible for most of the recent edits where http: was removed from the post. (I'd guess that typically that would be to be replaced by https.) SEDE
I see that also in some edit of your the sting http: disappeared in that revision. Here is a SEDE query.
Ok, so if I ask SEDE to show where http: or http://i.stack.imgur.com is used in the body, the sede does not actually check the MarkDown source as displayed after clickingon edit, but the rendered version?
Thanks a lot for your response. This is good to know.
I have edited a few http links to https on that thread (such as Wikipedia or arXiv). It is a minor change, but since the question was bumped by somebody else anyway, I thought it was worth doing. (Or at least better than somebody bumping the same post for such edit in a year.)
I wasn't sure whether I should do something with the pictures, too.
It is also useful to know about difference about Body in the Posts table and Text in the PostHistory table. (Probably it is not often important to distinguish between HTML and MarkDown, but in some cases it might matter.)
I should keep that in mind.
In any case, thanks again for your response about the pictures. It is good to know that if the pictures are working, it isn't necessary to change them to https.
