EE - Ask a Moderator

So tony stewart is back, and appears to be as inconsistently incoherent as in the past (and with his love of huge pictures in answers as well electronics.stackexchange.com/a/266846/1374

It really didn't come across as that, either to me or that user

There is nothing important happening in the world at a frequency of 433 milli-Hz to cause confusion.

Add a link to the datasheet (or a manual) for the motor control module which he's using. Add a link to the datasheet to the motor which he's using. Add a diagram showing how the components of his system (RPi, motor controller, motor, battery) are connected.

@DaveTweed My point was exactly that it looks highly unbecoming. If normal users answer a question and then join the close vote this is already frowned upon. You're saying "this question isn't good enough, improve it!" But at the same time you find it worthy of an answer. Which in the case of moderators doing that then rightly raises questions like the meta post by the OP about moderators harvesting points by answering and effectively blocking anyone else from answering.

Having said that, I will taunt the SE crew about forced lowercasing of tags.

@PeterJ Don't bother editing it. Marking it as spam gets it deleted fastest, but if you edit it and it is then deleted as spam, you get a penalty for being the last edit. (That's how the automated system works)

@Kellenjb Then edit and refine it. As it is improved people will vote to reopen, no harm done.

If not, then please do more research so that you can ask an informed question. You may find that your resulting question is about challenging a claim; that would be better suited for Skeptics. It might be about the physics behind electromagnetic waves and their effects on human bodies, that would probably be better suited for Physics. Finally, it may be about designing a device that shields workers from dangerously powerful electromagnetic fields, that would be welcome here.