CURED

general 6.5k stars 20 conversations schedule 4 feeds 14 access

CURED

$Mathematics$

For feedback/discussion/requests of Close/Undelete/Reopen/Edit/Delete for questions and answers on Math SE (for Math Meta stuff go to https://chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/64952). Install Makyen's review-script linked from https://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/54361568 (requires GreaseMonkey or Tampermonkey) to see real-time request status.

9h ago – Ѕᴀᴀᴅ

105k

386

info

export all events for this room

Starred posts

Mice Elf

Oct 7, 2015 17:34

@epimorphic Retracted, but there ought to be a target for "sum of arithmetic sequence by induction"... — Mice Elf 13 mins ago

barto

Sep 1, 2015 18:50

This is closed as a duplicate but it's not really a duplicate of the question linked to; maybe it's primarily opinion based? What is $\varphi(0)$?

Martin Sleziak

Aug 29, 2015 08:01

Combinatorial Proof for Binomial Identity: $\sum_{k = 0}^n \binom{k}{p} = \binom{n+1}{p+1}$ is currently closed as a duplicate of Prove $\sum_{i=0}^n\binom{i+k-1}{k-1}=\binom{n+k}{k}$.

làntèrn

Aug 12, 2015 18:44

"2 more votes are needed to delete this post" on my question math.stackexchange.com/questions/1309204/…. I was made a request to delete the question but the question seems not gaining much votes. The question is duplicate.

Najib Idrissi

Jun 24, 2015 07:24

The only difficulty seems to be writing down the equations (which doesn't involve math but rather the physics behind the problem), once they're written down they're immediate to solve.

Najib Idrissi

Jun 24, 2015 07:23

@AméricoTavares I'm sorry but I don't quite follow. How does the existence of answers imply that the question is on-topic? It is a basic question on electrical circuits. I know some people can learn about units or Newton's laws in something that's called a "math" class, but here it seems to be an enormous stretch...

Martin Sleziak

Jun 23, 2015 17:58

(Although a question can enter the review queue only once due to an edit. That's why if a question is put on hold, then the next edit should address the reasons for putting on hold.)

quid

May 29, 2015 21:23

@Yes Why? If it is of low quality no need to keep it. If it is of good quality, it should not be closed (other than dupe).

Yes

May 29, 2015 18:51

Q: New 10K tool: question close statistics

Two years ago, we rolled out some significant changes to closing, along with a massive number of changes behind the scenes to clean up the supporting logic that had grown crufty over the years. As with many ambitious projects, this one quickly pushed the limits of its 6–8 week implementation sche...

quid

Apr 11, 2015 23:01

@Lord_Farin So much for valuable content being "lost." It looks like everything is around multiple times anyway.

Najib Idrissi

Mar 11, 2015 08:24

@NajibIdrissi For those interested, it's because of this.

Famous Blue Raincoat

Feb 21, 2015 03:05

@NajibIdrissi SEDE query: Find the reviews for a post

Najib Idrissi

Feb 20, 2015 08:46

This Data.SE requests finds copy-pasted answers.

Famous Blue Raincoat

Feb 15, 2015 18:39

Search query questions with plz in body returns things that need to be edited, closed or deleted.

Fundamental

Jan 27, 2015 18:54

@anorton When I step on a rake, I try to remember and make sure I do it next day too, for the sake of consistency.

anorton

Jan 27, 2015 16:56

I think some of the massively upvoted ones should be locked as "Preserved for historical significance, but no longer considered a good, on-topic question for this site."

Fundamental

Jan 26, 2015 01:41

Note to self: should this happen again, ping a mod in the room instead of calling upon the entire SE army.

hichris123

Jan 26, 2015 01:11

@Doorknob It would have been better if Undo posted the chat message.

Martin Sleziak

Jan 23, 2015 12:04

duplicate I think that A calculus proof for the general term of the Fibonacci sequence can be closed as a duplicate of some of the posts mentioned in the comments.

anorton

Jan 21, 2015 22:04

@Lord_Farin Such a comment is a good idea for (at least) two reasons: 1) it clearly tells the OP "watch me, so later you may do as I do," and 2) it lets future readers understand that not all the effort in the question was from the OP.

Lord_Farin

Jan 21, 2015 21:57

@Fundamental Being helped $\ne$ Have answers.

Lord_Farin

Jan 21, 2015 21:17

@MartinSleziak FWIW, I think this is bad practice. You should not be impersonating the OP. If you want it reopened, convince people under your own title, e.g. in a comment.

quid

Jan 16, 2015 23:24

Either way, I consider it as a false dichotomy to have "community votes" and "moderator votes," especially since votes to close/reopen (in contrast to up/down votes) are not expressions of a personal opinion but enforcing policies, for everybody. The name "vote" is really confusing in this context, unfortunately.

anorton

Jan 14, 2015 21:49

undelete (maybe?) math.stackexchange.com/questions/288416/…

anorton

Jan 6, 2015 18:56

room topic changed to Reopen? Undelete? Close? Delete?: Sorting things out when the usual review process does not work. [close] [delete] [duplicate] [reopen] [undelete]

Martin Sleziak

Dec 29, 2014 23:41

(The result of review was leave closed. Is there much of a chance, that many other users would notice the post in review history or stumbled upon it in some other way?)

Martin Sleziak

Dec 29, 2014 23:39

Especially with robo-reviewers and many people having differing opinion what should be re-open and what shouldn't.

Martin Sleziak

Dec 29, 2014 23:36

Well, I would say that there are still cases when reopen queue is not sufficient. (Of course, I might be wrong.)

Behaviour

Dec 27, 2014 21:57

I consider the approach "here are moderator powers, now go and don't use them" to be a bigger problem than an occasional mistake by a moderator.

Martin Sleziak

Mar 22, 2014 11:25

I see now, voting to delete answers is possible after 20k. (I do not remember how many votes are needed.)

J. M.

Oct 27, 2012 20:02

@MartinSleziak Yup, you should bug any of the mods the next time the room gets frozen again to unfreeze it.