Discussion on question by The Pointer: Does Gödel’s incompleteness theorems imply the necessity of an infinite recursive hierarchy of “proofs”, and that any “proof” is relative?
Discussion on question by The Pointer: Does Gödel’s incompleteness theorems imply the necessity of an infinite recursive hierarchy of “proofs”, and that any “proof” is relative?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b6950/b69505688ff74d678f82da45ec32c1f3a5b5e638" alt="Philosophy Philosophy"
Imported from a comment discussion on https://philosophy.stackexchange.com/questions/116958/does-g%c3%b6del-s-incompleteness-theorems-imply-the-necessity-of-an-infinite-recursiv
first message | 2024-09-10 |
last message | 151 days ago |
view transcript
3