Conversation started Feb 9, 2016 at 22:53.
Feb 9, 2016 22:53
All right, second question: is geometric albedo constant or does it change as the planet rotates? Also, is bond albedo constant?
By "constant", I mean it doesn't change when the planet rotates
I'm not even going to be able to participate in this one. :P
That does not change, that is for sure
Bond or geometric?
Both of them
Really?
Isn't geometric albedo the brightness when illumination comes from directly behind the observer?
So wouldn't it make a difference as the planet rotates, and light reflects off land, then ice, etc.?
Feb 9, 2016 22:58
But it averages out over one revolution
Oooh
So it's the average!
So wait, how is it different from Bond albedo?
Geometric is reflection towards the light source, Bond is in all directions
Oh yeah
All right, thanks
Wait, then what is geometric good for? Wouldn't Bond give us a better idea of the temperatures and surfaces of planets?
That is correct
Feb 9, 2016 23:04
Geometric predicts what you actually observes
All right, and what would it tell us?
"If I shine a bright light at this object, how bright would the surface look like from my point of view?"
So geometric and bond have two completely different uses?
yeah...
Feb 9, 2016 23:07
And confusing
And what would we use that data for?
How would it tell us about the planet?
Besides how shiny it is?
Geometric is "how shiny". Bond for calculating things like the surface temperature
Er, okay...
But do we need to know how shiny something is? Would it tell us the distance, or anything?
Does it help us find the Bond albedo?
They are two different measures, but not independent
Any formula relating them?
Feb 9, 2016 23:12
Only for perfect Lambertian surfaces and that kind of things. e.g. Not for any real objects. Then you do only have approximations.
Welcome to the insane world of optics!
Wait wait, if we're only using Lambertian surfaces, how does geometric albedo help us get any info in the slightest?
It's purely idealistic
But approximations can be good too
Yeah, but no surface can reflect and diffuse light like a Lambertian surface
Sure, but it is like using the black body radiation laws for approximating real emission.
Feb 9, 2016 23:15
Or patched conics for the n-body problem
So...geo albedo only tells us how a Lambertian surface would reflect light at that distance?
No, no, geo is a real thing
And Bond?
Is a real thing too
Feb 9, 2016 23:17
You can not just be sure how they are related
OOOooooohhhh
Unless you have a Lambertian surface...
Or complete knowledge of the optical properties of the object in question
Ahhh...okay, makes sense :D
Thanks!
 
Conversation ended Feb 9, 2016 at 23:18.