Conversation started Feb 27, 2014 at 20:50.
Feb 27, 2014 20:50
^^ what do you think?
@Vader About 6 atm I think
4 main ones and 3 others currently
There's Ton, Brecht, Campbell and Sergey
@gandalf3 didn't we already discuss this
Yes
But the amount of snapping questions we get..
@stacker yes, so 6 full time
Feb 27, 2014 20:52
Why shouldn't it be a tag?
@gandalf3 I think we opted to drop under modeling I think
I guess that might make sense
@iKlsR more tags is not a bad thing. I think we should create it
@Vader It was already created.
But we have so many questions, I feel like we should have another category..
Feb 27, 2014 20:54
@Vader It's no the problem of creating it or having more tags, it's of having so many small localized tags.
@iKlsR Twice at a that :P
I'm not sure it is localized..
@Vader The more question we get the more it would help to organiza, yep.
ohk
blender.stackexchange.com/search?q=snapping Nearly all of those could use a snapping tag
I think it is natural thet we will have more specific tags as user base grows
Feb 27, 2014 20:56
@gandalf3 That is an impressing example
Yes but I was always one for the large broad tag. This was sometime ago still and we have grown twice the size since then.
True, we should think about being more specific tho.
Just don't want too many , or derivatives floating around.
@iKlsR I agree with that
Things like and etc.
wait, is an actual tag..
@iKlsR I absolutly agree with that, time will tell although I was sceptical in the first place.
Should that one be a synonym of ?
I know there are other ways of mirroring,,
@gandalf3 Not really, you can mirror with Ctrl M and you can also mirror in other views excluding the 3d view and on objects that the modifier doesn't work on.
Feb 27, 2014 21:00
But they probably would be best under
I guess maybe not
nvm, is good

Tags Discussion

Dec 4 '13 at 22:00, 54 minutes total – 189 messages, 8 users, 0 stars

Bookmarked Dec 4 '13 at 22:55 by iKlsR

The great tag cleanup of 2013.
@iKlsR That's convenient..
@gandalf3 @Vader @stacker Actually, I say go for it.
@iKlsR This should be a meta topic
I didn't know you could separate little snippets of the chat..
Feb 27, 2014 21:03
Create as many as you think are needed, we can always set aside a couple minutes to purge and refactor.
@iKlsR Go for what?
What should we do about all the potential questions that are not tagged with ?
Tag them all?
Or leave them and just tag new ones?
I was thinking of trashing since it's on so many of them but that would affect other questions.
@gandalf3 And what about "adjust normals"?
We could start with new ones and older more explicit snapping questions.
@iKlsR does seem a bit borderline too general..
@stacker Hm?
Feb 27, 2014 21:05
@gandalf3 Well, it can be used in correlation with the text editor, the vse etc.
@iKlsR Perhaps.. but it can and is used nearly everywhere.. plus we have and ..
heh
The general problem here is that we need to be more specific while not having these specific tags fit so neatly under the broad tag.
@gandalf3 sorry seems I got it wrong
Perhaps we ought to make this another tag discussion (well, it already is. But I mean officially)..
@gandalf3 We should do this on meta for users that join later
Feb 27, 2014 21:08
Good idea
@gandalf3 @stacker Yeah
Should I write something up?
Don't have the time right now tho for the discussion.
@gandalf3 For?
@iKlsR Meta Tags post
@gandalf3 Sure, why not.
Feb 27, 2014 21:09
k
 
Conversation ended Feb 27, 2014 at 21:09.