Conversation started May 29, 2013 at 16:19.
Ali
Ali
May 29, 2013 16:19
The distinction is that we dont consider fatwas as Quran hadith , whereas the rabbis saying are considered to be torah
(Rabbinic))Torah=Torah+Talmud(sanhedrin+rambam+rashi+....)
@Ali Ok, but that is a much subtler difference than you seem to think it is
Either way, they are totally binding
And either way, the consequences for violating decrees are less severe than for violating the original law
Torah, in addition to it's meaning as the book of law, is also a word with a much broader meaning
Unlike Quran which (AFAIK) is only the specific book
Ali
Ali
Infact I also stumbled upon a tag in mi.yodeya where it literally said something like rabbi framing laws
The word "Torah" is sort of a word that means Jewish learning
@Ali Yes, the rabbis created laws. Those are "rabbinic laws"
They don't have the same authority as the written Torah
but we still follow them
The thing is that you don't seem to understand the distinction between rabbinic laws and Torah laws
Like separating meat and milk, as we have discussed in the past
Ali
Ali
@Daniel I do understand framing decrees or judgements but laws?
That is a Torah law, not a rabbinic one
@Ali What don't you understand about it?
We give the rabbis the authority to create laws
Maybe you don't like it
But that's just how it is
That's Judaism
Ali
Ali
May 29, 2013 16:28
Thats just Rabbinic Judaism
@Ali Yes, that's what we follow today
Ali
Ali
Karaites , samaritans and many others have a different take on this and are aligned with the Islamic standpoint
@Ali So?
They don't really exist today
except in very small numbers
Ali
Ali
@Daniel You gave the rabbis power to create laws , which is akin to adding laws
@Ali I didn't give them that power. The Torah gives them that power
May 29, 2013 16:31
@Ali - Are you trying to debate a foundation of rabbinic Judaism, then?
Ali
Ali
In Islam we have fatwas, they are based on Quran hadith they dont make new laws totally unrelated or to do "fencing"
Karaites and samaritans disagree with that interpretation
That's fine
They don't follow normative Judaism
That's a fine thing to do, but mi.yodeya is the wrong forum for debating it
@Ali Ok. We don't follow Islam, though. Our rules are different
Ali
Ali
But there is a prohibition to add new laws and some rabbis have done it under the garb of "fencing"
so the core law is being violated
May 29, 2013 16:33
@Ali That's your interpretation
Those rabbis know more about it than you do, though
Trust me, they know that you're not allowed to add to the Torah
There is no prohibition on making decrees and calling them decrees
Ali
Ali
@Daniel I find no problem in giving decrees\fatwas which are important
But they should be derived from the revelation book
@Ali Frankly, we don't care what you have a problem with and what you don't
You are making up rules of Judaism that don't exist
We don't follow Islam's rules about these things
We follow our own
Ali
Ali
So who makes up the rules?
@Ali Nobody makes them up
They are found in the Torah
Ali
Ali
and who is authorized to make the rules
May 29, 2013 16:39
@Ali Which rules?
Ali
Ali
the one you are refereing to
rules of Judaism
@Ali The groundwork comes from the Written Torah
That's where we find the authority of the rabbis to make decrees
Ali
Ali
decrees is fine as I said its the fencing which violates the commandment to not add laws
@Ali I say it doesn't violate that commandment
So there
you can't argue with me
because I didn't give a reason
That's the way you are arguing
 
2 hours later…
May 29, 2013 18:13
@daniel Mikwoh is custom now a days. Also the decree for a Baal Keri to not recite torah or anything like that by 3zra is a "fatwa" in his time as seen in the gamoro which says it was his time. Mikwoh is not needed to Daven just minhag
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob You are talking about men, then?
Ok
Then I agree
I was confused becaues the part of the paragraph that I thought you were referencing said that Mikveh for women was added by Ezra
 
Conversation ended May 29, 2013 at 18:16.