No, because those are the requirements, and Code Review will last longer than your link. Also, the code needs to be working, so, if you read the help center (because, you know, clicking a link is not too hard....) you will understand the process.... thanks — rolfl ♦1 min ago
So, I thought I'd do this using scipy.constants:
import numpy as np
from scipy.constants import physical_constants
constants = np.array([(k,)+v+(np.nan,) for k,v in physical_constants.items()],
dtype=[('name', 'S50'), ('val', 'f8'), ('units', 'S10'),
('abs_unc...
Dude.. Seriously? The code works.. click the darn link. I'm looking for a review of the code and feedback on any edge cases or race conditions that I may have missed. So much for this being a helpful community. What a totalitarian, nonsensical joke. — RavenHursT1 min ago
5 minute timeout .... for me.... before I do something daft.
@rolfl I think it's just bad wording for "it works as far as I know, but I might have missed something, hence I'm here asking for a review" - I stand by my reopen vote.
> @RavenHursT This isn't about being juvenile nonsense, it's about respecting people that come here to review your working code. What's juvenile nonsense, is to disrespect the people that try hard every day to keep this site on-topic. See for yourself, how helpful this community is. The only thing we ask, is that you follow a very short and easy-to-follow set of rules.
@RavenHursT please excercise care when talking with a community mod. especially when this community mod is backed up by the whole community of this site. We politely asked you to comply to the minimal standards we require of questions. These standards are not randomly created by 12 year olds, but we have put a lot of though into them. We want you to comply to these standards to minimize the effort we as helpers have, and to provide maximum learning effect to you as asker. And if you can't accept that, feel free to leave and never come back. — Vogel61230 secs ago
That's the problem.. Look at the question. I've done exactly what your "moderator" has asked for. But apparently simply questioning your "standards", even after complying, is enough to still deny a user from using your service. So much for an "open" community. Whatever. — RavenHursT24 secs ago
I am sorry, but I fail to understand. As our mod quoted, I quote again: "I know there's some edge cases and race conditions that I'm missing." This means your code is not doing what it's supposed to. You can ask a question on Stack Overflow for that kind of issue. We will be happy to review your code, as soon as you have included fixes for these "edge cases" and "race conditions" — Vogel61211 secs ago
If my direct SO weren't such a simpleton that she does sometimes not understand the simplest descriptions (and despite being a programmer) I think this would have been the point where I snapped..
@rolfl I think it's just bad wording for "it works as far as I know, but I might have missed something, hence I'm here asking for a review" - I stand by my reopen vote.
To get an idea of what the controller code reflects, here is a screenshot: http://i58.tinypic.com/24waq04.png
Basically, the idea is that you print out a list of football players which you can then filter by their name, price, field position, and team. I'm not sure whether it's better to handle ...
duplicate post with probably just another uneducated SO user.
Obviously... I did ask my question in SO.. and was told to come here for my question. And now you're telling me to go back??? stackoverflow.com/questions/23122781/… Please.. tell me which other hoops I need to jump through so that I can simply be allowed to ask a question. Maybe I should dance? Seriously.. someone call #snowden... — RavenHursT1 min ago
> @RavenHursT no problem, you got my +1 here, for the efforts you've put into making your question on-topic. This is the very first time I witness this kind of heat on this site - this community is known to be warmly welcoming and respectful, all that we ask is to go by the [rather small set of] rules; don't forget there's a meta site if you feel these rules are unfair or otherwise wrong.
I'll repeat, I think the post should be reopened regardless of the OP's attitude - we can fix that later, for now we need to save a user from walking away hating us and spreading wrong information about the CR experience.
Such people are annoying... Ever moderated a text-based gaming site where moderating/adminning is not only about user retention, but also about actual money...
We're not trying to censor, we're trying to keep the comments section clean and on-topic. Comparing us to a totalitarian government won't help anyone. Do keep in mind that this post is receiving reopen votes, which means others agree that this should be reopened. Please try to cool down for a bit while this is going on. — Jamal ♦23 secs ago
I have a project that I've been trying to get just right for the past three months and it's still not quite there yet.
I'm injecting some jQuery and jQueryUi code into pages that I have no control over and I need to be able to "sandbox" my code away from anything that may or may not be there at ...
@RavenHursT you got my +1 here, for the efforts you've put into making your question on-topic. This is the very first time I witness this kind of heat on this site - this community is known to be warmly welcoming and respectful, all that we ask is to go by the [rather small set of] rules; don't forget there's a meta site if you feel these rules are unfair or otherwise wrong. What's true is that CR isn't a debugging service, to put it shortly, we answer the question "does this code make my ass look fat?" ;) — Mat's Mug18 secs ago
I've refrain from commenting, editing and even vote to reopen his question even if I think it's still off-topic currently (he's still asking for debugging)
@Malachi From his question : Please fork this and tell me what I've missed.. Tired of spinning my wheels on this issue. He's still talking about issue. The question is good but this part should be modified a bit.
So, I thought I'd do this using scipy.constants:
import numpy as np
from scipy.constants import physical_constants
constants = np.array([(k,)+v+(np.nan,) for k,v in physical_constants.items()],
dtype=[('name', 'S50'), ('val', 'f8'), ('units', 'S10'),
('abs_unc...
