Conversation started Aug 22, 2019 at 16:24.
Aug 22, 2019 16:24
@Jasmine the function can be continuous on its domain and at the same time has a missing point discontinuity
This is what I am coming to here.
But for that I really need to tell you what a limit point is and what a isolated point is.
@Mann ohhhh !!
In our case 0 is the limit point of the domain $\mathbb{R}-0$
Here's how you characterizes it.
@Mann am I expected to answer this in JEE too
I am not sure, but I this concept is very fundamental to the definition of the limit. It's disastrous not knowing it
think*
And it's simple too
@Mann ok please enlighten
Aug 22, 2019 16:27
GIve me 10 min
Brb
Aug 22, 2019 16:43
I am explaining something important to my friend. Please give me few minutes
i will be back
@Mann yea fine
Aug 22, 2019 17:12
@Mann I will have to go its raining heavily
please still write what you wanted to explain
I will see when I am back :)
@Jasmine I am back
For now, this definition is good enough for you.
A point $a \in \mathbb{R}$ is a limit point of a subset $D \subset R$ iff every open interval in $\mathbb{R}$ containing the point $a$ contains a point of $D$.
For example
$0 \in \mathbb{R}$
$\mathbb{R}-0 \subset \mathbb{R}$
@Mann ok
Any open interval contain $0$ is of the form $(-\epsilon,\epsilon)$ for arbitrary epsilon.
Every such open interval $(-\epsilon,\epsilon)$ contains a point of $\mathbb{R}-0$
@Mann go on
Therefore $0$ is a limit point of the subset $\mathbb{R}-0$
Understand this argument what I have laid properly Jasmine
So far
(The interval can also be non symmetric but it won't change anything)*
It will take some time, so think about it carefully.
@Jasmine
Mainly, I want you to visualize the definition I gave.
Aug 22, 2019 17:24
@Mann yes
You visualized it with the example?
I am reading now more carefully
Okayy
@Mann does contains a pont of D means contains at least a point of D
Yess
Atleast one point of D
Aug 22, 2019 17:27
@Mann ok
I think I understood what you mean by limit point
Now, let me give some counterexamples, you tell why they are so.
2 is not a limit point of the subset $(-1,1)$
You got it why?
@Mann yes because (1,3) doesnt contain anything from (-1,1)
YES!
Now one more
$(-8,-7) \cup \left\{0\right\} \cup (7,8)$
0 is not a limit point of this set.
I forgot to add one thing, I am sorry.
Contains a point of D other than $a$
A point a∈R is a limit point of a subset D⊂R iff every open interval in R containing the point a contains a point of D other than $a$
Any point in subset $D$ which is not a limit point is a isolated point of $D$
$0$ is a isolated point of $(-8,-7) \cup \left\{0\right\} \cup (7,8)$
THis is the last, thing and we are done with the base
@Mann (-5,5) doesnt contain D except for {0}
Yep!
Now limits are only for those values of $x$ which are limit points a domain $D$
We don't have any sense of what is a limit at a point which is not a limit point.
For example to talk about the limit at $x=0$ in the above is non sense
Aug 22, 2019 17:36
@Mann so essentially limit exists for xsin (2/x) at 0 as its the limit point
Yep!
$x=0$ is a limit point
even though it is not in domain but it doesn't matter
The reason for that is that, the very definition of limit is that we are approaching closer and closer to 0
but we never equal 0
So we do not need 0 to be in the domain as long as it can be "approached"
And what about the missing point discontinuity we are taught
And it can be approached exactly when it's a limit point.
Yeaa coming to that too.
BUt you understand until this right?
@Mann yes !
And why did I define limit point, you also understood right?
Here's one more example just to be safe
$f : ( -3,2) \cup \left\{0\right\} \cup (2,3) \to \mathbb{R} $ as $f(x)=x$
THere is no sense of talking about limit at $x=0$
But there is sense of talking about limits at $[-3,2] \cup [2,3]$
$0$ is "unapproachable" and the set I defined later on is approachable.
Aug 22, 2019 17:41
@Mann yes as 0 is not the limit point
Yep
Now, to the to the fun part.
$ f : (-2,3) \cup (4,6) \to \mathbb{R} $ given by $f(x)=x$
is continuous by definition
Can you see why?
@Mann one sec
Because if this is continuous, for the same reason. $f(x)=x\sin(2/x)$ was continuous on its domain $\mathbb{R} - 0$. This does need a little bit more proof, I haven't verified this exactly properly. But I think it's true most probably.
@Mann [-2,3] U [4,6] are limit points
Yep.
Aug 22, 2019 17:50
They are limit points so that means limit exists at those points
Yep.
BUt continuity is only checked at points in the domain $D$
Not at limit points.
which are outside domain $D$
@Mann ok so that would mean sin (2/x ) is discontinuous at 0
at what?
Nope.
$x=0$ is not a point of the domain.
@Mann but 0 is not the part of domain
Yes, continuity has no sense outside the domain
You can't talk about continuity of a function outside its domain.
No no.
Well yes in a sense
But
is different
That definition you gave me about discontinuity something something
See what it states.
Aug 22, 2019 17:54
@Mann missing point discontinuity you mean
Yess
THis new defintion
The discontinuity is said to be of missing point type if the limit of the function exists at point 'a' but the function is not defined at that point, i.e. lim x→a f(x) exists but f(a) is not defined."
It is defined for points specifically outside the domain.
It's not the same continuity.
@Mann ohhhhh
That's why I said, a function can be continuous and at the same time have a missing point discontinuity.
Coool !
The definition says that $f(a)$ is not defined.
therefore $a \notin D$
It's exclusively defined for points outside of function's domain.
You got it right?
Aug 22, 2019 17:57
@Mann one thing
Yes?
You said if say ${\alpha}$ is a limit point of any function then what is correct-
$\alpha \in \mathbb{R}$ can be a limit point of a $D \subset \mathbb{R}$ only.
a) we can talk about limit at ${\alpha}$
a) true.
Aug 22, 2019 18:00
b) limit exists at ${\alpha}$
I dint think b) is true
b) That will depend though, you will have to use the epsilon delta definition of limit.
If b) was true then limit would have existed at 0 in sin(1/x)
Yep!
Which is not true
b) is not necessarily true,
Aug 22, 2019 18:02
@Mann Thank you !! You are awesome !
Haha, no issues.
Got to learn a really nice thing today
 
Conversation ended Aug 22, 2019 at 18:02.