Conversation started Mar 19, 2016 at 17:24.
Mar 19, 2016 17:24
Question...
anyone know about neutron stars and degenerate gases?
...what do you want to know about them?
Well, when a neutron star compresses and the Fermi energy rises, will all the neutrons rise to a higher energy level?
0
Q: Asking moderators favors when looking at questions

Pichi WuanaSome of my questions were on-hold and closed. As everyone knows, it comes a yellow rectangle where it explains what it means and why is your question not so good. For example: Sometimes, this rectangle doesn't explain enough why was the question closed or put on-hold. Is it okay to write in t...

@SirCumference Are you asking whether the energy of the lowest lying state rises or stays the same? (I think it stays the same, but I don't know about neutron stars)
Yep
Really?
Then how can all the energy levels be filled to the Fermi energy when a star compresses?
If the Fermi energy rises
Mar 19, 2016 17:31
The Fermi energy is just the difference between the lowest and the highest occupied state at zero temperature. Isn't saying "the Fermi energy rises" the same as saying "the Fermi gas compresses", since more fermions distributed on the same states means higher states must get occupied?
Sorry if I'm misunderstanding it, but when the Fermi energy rises, doesn't that mean that most of the fermions will gain energy?
If the Fermi energy rises, then the highest occupied state would probably be higher, right?
Or the lowest state would be lower...any way, the difference in highest and lowest must be greater, right?
@SirCumference No. It just means the difference between the lowest and the highest occupied state changes. But a priori you can't say whether that is because the individual levels shifted or because you just have more fermions occuping states whose spacing is still the same.
But there aren't necessarily more fermions in the star, right? So why would more fermions be distributed on the same states?
Sorry if I'm not understanding you
Doesn't pressure just generally change the energy levels of a system
Mar 19, 2016 17:37
@SirCumference The density of states of a Fermi gas is constant. If you increase the density of the fermions, then you get a rising Fermi energy simply because you need to distribute more fermions on the same states.
@Slereah What? The states know nothing of pressure, pressure is a thermodynamic quantity.
Well states know of the volume in which they are constrained!
Alright, idiot question here, but why would you need to distribute more fermions on the same states if you increase the density of the fermions?
I need to read more into this
@SirCumference Just look at the computation of the Fermi energy for a 3D fermi gas in a box. The number density of the fermions appears very straightforwardly.
Mar 19, 2016 17:54
@Slereah everyone else does quantum BS
All right, and with a rising Fermi energy, higher energy levels will be occupied, and pressure increases?
Since the neutrons now move more?
Let's talk about quantum states in GR
We're the only people who care about the only physics that actually matters
No.
@0celo7 Cough neutron stars cough
Pretty important
@SirCumference Ehhhhh, I'd say that the pressure comes from elsewhere (gravitational attraction), I don't see what it has to do with neutrons "moving" more (don't say that, quantum objects don't really move about). And "particles moving" would be temperature, not pressure, anyway
Mar 19, 2016 17:57
Fuck it, my source sucks then
It's feeding me lies
Doesn't pressure cause gravitational attraction?
...what?
sigh...
I heard in GR, pressure can be a source of gravitational curvature in spacetime
Oh, that
I don't know what to think now...
Yes, pressure is a part of the stress-energy
Mar 19, 2016 17:59
Oh thank god
Alright, so gravity is causing the pressure, which causes gravity, which...
But I mean that the pressure on the neutrons in the star is because they attract each other (and that attraction has nothing to do with the gravitation the pressure itself might generate)
Then why do they attract?
...because they have mass?
Shoot...
Well what about the strong force?
Does it affect their attraction?
Excuse my ignorance here, honestly trying to understand it all
Not in the model you're looking at, I think.
Mar 19, 2016 18:01
Er...why not?
Because you talk about "Fermi energy" and such - that's characteristic of a Fermi gas, and that doesn't have the strong force in it, usually
Er...why not?
Also, the strong force is...not really a force, so you can't talk about it "causing attraction"
strong interaction
Excuse me
user54412
@BernardMeurer ::mumble:: asynchronous communication ::mumble:: protocol
Mar 19, 2016 18:04
@SirCumference When you model the neutron star as a bunch of neutrons, you can't easily include the strong force, as that would either require a quark-gluon model, or the effective treatment with pions mediating it.
But that's okay since it doesn't really appear as a "force" anyway
Jesus christ...so let's see if I got this straight
Neutron stars form. Gain mass, compress, Fermi energy rises, pressure increases
More mass, more pressure, higher fermi energy
Eventually black hole forms when pressure is high enough?
@DanielSank But wolfram alpha doesn't really try
try mathematica then?
Mar 19, 2016 18:11
@SirCumference I...guess so? (Although I don't know why you keep mentioning the Fermi energy. You could just say "Star compresses until density is high enough for ablack hole to form". And I have a feeling the actual process would have a quark-gluon plasma phase between the neutron and the BH, but I don't know)
Mathematica solves it just fine @DanielSank @ACuriousMind
I always thought the neutron degeneracy pressure increased because the Fermi energy increased...
user54412
@Danu I was just going to say the same!
I can't believe nobody tried this haha
There are some conditions though
@SirCumference The "degeneracy pressure" is the pressure the neutrons exert against being compressed, it's not what compresses them.
@Danu Haha, I don't have Mathematica :P
Mar 19, 2016 18:14
All right, and where does the pressure come from?
@SirCumference Gravitational attraction of the neutrons, didn't I already say that?
The integral only converges is $Re(z^2)<0$
I don't know what z is supposed to be
GRAAAH
All right, well could you at least read what Rob Jeffries told me a few days ago?
It seems to be contradicting you
7
A: How could a neutron star collapse into a black hole?

Rob JeffriesThe scenario you describe may occur. On the other hand it may actually be that neutronisation in a white dwarf is the trigger for a thermonuclear type Ia supernova. You may be misunderstanding the Pauli Exclusion Principle (PEP).The PEP states that no two fermions can occupy the same quantum sta...

@SirCumference What?
Also @DanielSank your question has a typo, since you wrote:
Mar 19, 2016 18:15
@0celo7 What what?
Uh-oh. If you think I'm contradicting Rob than either I'm wrong or you're misunderstanding one of us ;)
$$P_Z(z) = \int_{-\infty}^\infty P_X(x) P_Y(z/y) \frac{1}{|z|}dz \, .$$
I'm so confused right now...
But the right hand side doesn't depend on $z$, but on $y$
I hope you meant to write
@ChrisWhite Wut
user54412
Mar 19, 2016 18:16
@DanielSank $$\int_0^\infty \exp\left(-\frac{r^2+(z/r)^2}{\sigma^2N}\right) \frac{\mathrm{d}r}{r} = K_0\left(\frac{2z}{\sigma^2N}\right)$$
$$P_Z(z) = \int_{-\infty}^\infty P_X(x) P_Y(z/y) \frac{1}{|y|}dy \, .$$
@ChrisWhite YES you're around
@ChrisWhite Didn't you get teh condition on $z$ though?
What' s a GOTO for?
user54412
@Danu That holds for $\sigma$, $N$, and $z$ all positive reals. Didn't check more generally.
Mar 19, 2016 18:17
@ChrisWhite I find that strange
FullSimplify[Integrate[Exp[(-x^2 + A^2/x^2)/B] x, {x, 0, Infinity}],
Assumptions -> B > 0 && A > 0]
user54412
@BernardMeurer Summoning Cthulhu
Undefined for me
@ChrisWhite HAHAHAHA
I'm looking at this fortran code
and there's all these GOTOs everywhere
and I have no idea what I'm doing
halp, what's a goto
It goes to a line, obviously.
user54412
@Danu it's 1/x, not x, outside the exponential
Mar 19, 2016 18:19
@ChrisWhite #epicfail
Thanks.
@BernardMeurer Hating your life, usually.
lol
@DanielSank lol
user54412
@BernardMeurer They literally redirect code execution to that line of the code
@0celo7 Would you happen to know about neutron stars and degenerate gases?
Mar 19, 2016 18:20
fortran's some evil stuff
@BernardMeurer Went to a Brazilian all you can eat steak place today
@ChrisWhite I still get undefined
@SirCumference He's just saying that there is a small window just before the star collapses where the increasing degeneracy pressure actually leads to compressing the star even quicker (due to the pressure being a part of stress-energy), so even if the degeneracy pressure somehow increased arbitrarily fast, it would not rescue the star.
@SirCumference I've looked at their GR a little bit, but not anything specific.
@ChrisWhite NO, really? It's based on the bloody line of code?
Mar 19, 2016 18:20
@ACuriousMind I know, but how about the part with Fermi energy?
That's such a bad idea
Doesn't it say that the pressure increases as Fermi energy rises?
@ChrisWhite FullSimplify[
Integrate[(Exp[(-x^2 + A^2/x^2)/B^2])/x, {x, 0, Infinity}],
Assumptions -> B > 0 && A > 0]
Gives me undefined
@0celo7 Nice stuff, which one?
@SirCumference The degeneracy pressure.
Mar 19, 2016 18:21
Did I not specify I was talking about that?
user54412
@BernardMeurer what?
user54412
Though maybe I'm also failing
The degeneracy pressure matters
@ChrisWhite Wow, the depths of badness in that idea is impressive :-)
Mar 19, 2016 18:21
@0celo7 The name of the place
user54412
DS's integral is designed to fool us all
Oh
Texas de Brazil
@ACuriousMind Isn't it what is mainly preventing the star from collapsing?
@SirCumference You talked about the star getting compressed and the pressure rising. When you talk about something being "compressed" I assume "pressure" refers to the thing compressing it, not to the thing trying to counteract the compression.
All you can eat steakhouse. Only in America, baby.
Mar 19, 2016 18:22
Crap...I probably should've specified that...
@0celo7 Dunno that one. Fogo de Chão is pretty damn good (there's one in Cali afaik)
All right, so Fermi energy DOES play a role in it?
@ChrisWhite Why would anyone fill their code with GOTO like this? it's bloody unreadable
@BernardMeurer probably had a 3000 calorie meal
Didn't even have a soda!
@0celo7 No wonder you're a giant
Mar 19, 2016 18:23
@SirCumference It's what determines the degeneracy pressure, yes. But I'd say the degeneracy pressure plays more of a role in every case where a black hole doesn't form :P
@ChrisWhite ^
user54412
@BernardMeurer well if you don't have a notion of loops or else statements
@ACuriousMind That's just...
Yeah...
Weird...
So why does the Fermi energy increase the degeneracy pressure?
Mar 19, 2016 18:24
@BernardMeurer No
@ChrisWhite Papa bless programmers in the 60's
They were bloody warriors
user54412
@Danu So it's possible both are right, but yours in tacitly incomplete
user54412
whereas mine is explicitly ignoring complex z
@ChrisWhite No
When I input $z>0$ I get undefined, explicitly
user54412
@Danu wat
Mar 19, 2016 18:26
@ChrisWhite Seriously weird eh
@BernardMeurer I think the lobster bisque was 1000 calories right there
@SirCumference The higher the highest occupied level lies, the more energy could be set free if the fermions leave that highest energy level by falling into the ground state outside the star, and force (and thus pressure) is just a gradient of energy after all.
@0celo7 That's how we do it down here
Mar 19, 2016 18:27
Actually, I think for a simple Fermi gas the pressure is just the total energy per volume.
3000 Kcal meals and coup d'etats
@DanielSank Ah, yeah of course haha :)
Hell of a life
@ACuriousMind Wait, so the fermions have to leave the star?
@SirCumference No, that was a hypothetical.
Mar 19, 2016 18:27
Any ideas @ChrisWhite?
Copy-paste your code pliz?
"could be set free" is not "is set free". Read more carefully.
Wait, so why would the fermion drop down in energy then?
@SirCumference It doesn't. Force is the gradient of potential energy, it exists even if something counteracts it such that the motion to the lower energy state doesn't actually happen
@0celo7 Wanna play something? I'm back home
OOOOOOOOOOooooooh
 
Conversation ended Mar 19, 2016 at 18:29.