Conversation started Jun 24, 2013 at 18:51.
Jun 24, 2013 18:51
@msh210 So this is off-topic?! It has +14!
@CharlesKoppelman To the extent it asks about Judaism, it's not off-topic. Note: "What did a typical day look like for a woman living then and there? Did she pray (how?), participate in education (e.g. as a teacher), study (what?), interact with men in the community (how?), interact with non-Jews (how?), have any leadership role?" Probably some of those should be removed and the question recast. IMO. cc @MonicaCellio
Jun 24, 2013 19:08
@MonicaCellio i am not alone. look at @hacham-gabriel
@msh210 I think these are all intimately related to [The history of] Jewish life.
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob Heck, look at me.
But at least my scheme is fairly well understood by most.
@MonicaCellio yea look at @SethJ
And are therefore in scope.
(Or so I tell myself.)
Jun 24, 2013 19:13
I think the main difference between these and the FAQ no-go questions are that the FAQ no-go questions have a broader interest than folks interested in Jewish things (modern Israeli/American politics; general WWII buffs)
I think my rule of thumb is that if it's an aspect of Jewish history that doesn't have a large non-Jewish following, it might belong here.
...that's not quite right
but something along those lines
@msh210 my intent there was to ask specifically about Jewish life. The issues I called out are ones where I would expect halacha to have a voice.
This question would also be a no-go if we exclude Jewish history: judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/1679/…
@CharlesKoppelman I would have thought that question should be off-topic even before
@CharlesKoppelman better?
Jun 24, 2013 19:21
@CharlesKoppelman You're saying that is off-topic under current practice, is off-topic under current list (in the FAQ Help Center) of topics, is off-topic under the newly proposed off-topic closure reason, should be considered off-topic, or what? I'm sorry, but I'm not sure what you're getting at.
... In particular, I don't think anyone is proposing that we do or should exclude all history questions. Does your impression differ?
Jun 24, 2013 19:42
@msh210 I'm saying that the policies I see being practiced do not follow the guidelines expressed in this off-topic closure reason and that the examples given in the history section of the canonical in/out list are a little too single-subject to be clear
sorry
i meant to say this
no, that actually is what i meant to say'
:)
I also want to say that I really appreciate the policies in practice and don't want "history of Jewish life" to be exclusively about halakha
@msh210 and tisha esrei sifre Nach as well.
@MonicaCellio that being said, I do think the edits you made to that question make it more answerable, and if those are the questions you meant to ask, you just made it much clearer, so ...yes, better :)
@CharlesKoppelman I agree. As the asker of the "what was Jewish life like in...?" question you might have inferred that, but just being clear. :-)
@CharlesKoppelman thanks for the feedback, and for pointing out that it wasn't clear originally.
(I do some loose historical re-enactment so this actually is a practical question for me -- but not in a way that consulting my rabbi will help. :-) )
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob @msh210 lol
@msh210 I'm trying to say that given the information we would provide someone whose answer we close with the "No Jewish history" off-topic reason, it would seem to me that judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/10008/… is off-topic for this site. However, I see several questions in that category that have decent upvotes
...and more importantly, are good questions!
Jun 24, 2013 19:51
@DoubleAA :)
@CharlesKoppelman "except if related to Jewish life and learning" isn't clear enough? Hmm, do you have a suggested rewording of this one?
Jun 24, 2013 20:41
@CharlesKoppelman [Just catching up on backread.] The policies in practice match that off-topic closure reason AFAICT. Did you not see the "except as related to Jewish life and learning" part of the latter?
@DoubleAA Good point.
Also, how about replacing all instances in these of "Jewish life and learning" with "Judaism"? After years of seeing the former phrase around, I have trouble seeing what it adds that the one word lacks. — Isaac Moses 6 hours ago
Jun 24, 2013 21:11
@MonicaCellio It is indeed a US/UK difference. The US rules are very simple: the period (or comma) always goes within the quotation marks. The UK rules for the positioning of full stops and commas around quotation marks are more logical, but also significantly more complicated. I like them.
@TRiG I like and, when I can, follow them, despite being an American.
@TRiG yeah, I've long been a fan of logical, not "typographical", punctuation. Thanks for confirming the US/UK difference.
@TRiG I'm glad to see I'm not totally wrong about my punctuation :)
@Daniel Did you just use an emoticon as terminal punctuation? :-)
@MonicaCellio I did. That's another US/UK difference
Jun 24, 2013 21:26
@MonicaCellio I understand that this community (and the general Jewish community) understands "learning" in a very specific way, but that is not clear to anyone else. "Jewish learning" can easily be interpreted as "learning about things Jewish", which is very broad
@msh210 I don't think I understand exactly what is meant by "JL&L".
@msh210 and it certainly isn't clear to "those wanting to learn more"
When are the new closure changes going to take effect here?
@CharlesKoppelman What do you think of meta.judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/1729/…?
Jun 24, 2013 21:43
@msh210 I'm not sure that's what the site is about. Is it?
@Daniel I don't know. I don't think any non-SE-employee knows.
@CharlesKoppelman AFAICT.
"If you have a question about...
" Jewish law or practice (what to do or why)
" Jewish philosophy
" a Jewish text (explaining a passage)
" history of Jewish law or of Jewish life
" language used in Jewish life and learning
" general knowledge (science, etc.) as it relates directly to Jewish life and learning
"... (examples) then you've come to the right place."
Sounds to me like the site's about Judaism.
@msh210 Ok. I was just curious, because I saw that the [on hold] change has already been rolled out at least on MSO
@msh210 Sounds to me like it's about Jewish things
@CharlesKoppelman What's the distinction?
@Daniel Things definitely happen to different sites at different times. For all I know, the various closure-related changes may not happen at the same time, either. (On any one site, I mean.) But I don't know that.
@CharlesKoppelman You mean like bagels and skullcaps?
Jun 24, 2013 21:46
Jewish life != Judaism. There are other facets, like (among others) folk cultures
@CharlesKoppelman What do you mean by "folk cultures"?
@msh210 for instance, yiddish tales of ELiyahu
or distinctive dress of Teimani Jews
it's only recently that there's this false dichotomy created between "religion" and "culture"... it used to be "life"
All I'm saying is that this site's description is not clear to an outsider
@CharlesKoppelman Certainly separating religion and culture is a dicey business.
@CharlesKoppelman Judaism is definitely a way of life more than a religion in the way that people usually think of "religion".
@CharlesKoppelman Can you explain the kinds of things you're speaking about? Or, if you need to describe it by examples, then give more than two?
@msh210 Ha! That's actually exactly what I'm saying we need to do in the FAQs!
Right now there are three "out of scopes" in the FAQs that deal with history (I remember something along these lines coming up before)
Modern Israeli politics, Modern American politics, and the Holocaust
If I brought down a question about what the Jews of Mainz ate on a daily basis, would that be in scope?
What about synagogue architecture?
Or traditional names?
Jun 24, 2013 21:54
@CharlesKoppelman IMO no. (At least, not as you just worded it.) This has nothing to do with Judaism.
@CharlesKoppelman IMO yes: this has to do with Jewish life (and maybe halacha).
What about colors that different Jewish groups have proscribed? If it's done in the name of Judaism, does that make it different than if it's done in the name of something else?
@CharlesKoppelman I think yes (to your last question).
@msh210 So is it just applicability to halakha or texts?
@CharlesKoppelman No.
I'm trying to piece together the axes that you're using for determining this
I'm not trying to be pickayune, just to work out a solid definition (especially if it's going to get cast into bytes)
Why are names in scope and food is not/
Jun 24, 2013 21:58
@CharlesKoppelman I don't know why names would be in scope. Let's leave that alone for the moment if you don't mind. I know we have a bunch of name-relatd questions.
17
Q: Are there other extant Chabad groups besides Chabad-Lubavitch?

CuriouserWikipedia lists a number of different Chabad groups including: Chabad-Lubavitch Chabad-Bobroisk Chabad-Kapust Chabad-Liadi Chabad-Nezhin Chabad-Strashelye I was told that these different groups were all formed when the sons of the Tzemach Tzedek created their own Chasidic groups. But today, I...

@msh210 what did they eat in $location at $time by itself, no -- that's too far removed from Judaism. What would you think about a question about Shabbat meals, or a reputed Yom Tov tradition, or redactions of recipes from Jewish sources (c.f. A Drizzle of Honey)?
5
Q: Seeking old Jewish recipes

msh210What are some really old recipes that Jews are known to have used (actual recipes that say how to make the dish, not just names or descriptions of what was eaten like צלי קדר)? I'm seeking specifically recipes for food, not for medicine. And if you've tried one of the recipes, or know someone wh...

@msh210 oh right; that was you. :-)
@msh210 @CharlesKoppelman This has nothing to do with halacha or texts. But it's definitely (IMO) on-topic in that it's about a group of Jews which is defined by a Judaism-related inclusion-in-the-group rule.
@MonicaCellio A question asking what the Jews of Mainz, 1095, ate specially for Shabas would IMO be on-topic.
@msh210 So sociology is okay if it's about Jews doing Judaism things, I guess?
Jun 24, 2013 22:05
@CharlesKoppelman I... guess. Don't quote me on that, though. :-)
And don't consider my opinion authoritative, either.
What about Jews doing things as Jews, like not owning land?
I know
I'm just having a conversation to figure out where the muddle is
@CharlesKoppelman I don't understand what you mean.
Doesn't everyone do everything as what he is? (I kid, but I really don't know what you're asking.)
@msh210 Jews were forbidden, as a class, from owning land in Europe for a good part of history
@CharlesKoppelman What does that have to do with Judaism?
@msh210 Since that was something Jews were excluded from as a class (or something else Jews as a class were included in... like pogroms!), is that on topic?
Jun 24, 2013 22:07
@CharlesKoppelman IMO no.
@msh210 So group membership is not sufficient. It needs, (in your opinion) to tie into something holy - something Judaism-related
@CharlesKoppelman Yeah.
@msh210 I'm happy with that definition, and I think it's more explicit than "Jewish life"
@msh210 We might need to ask a wider audience to agree, but I think that's closer to what we see on the ground
@CharlesKoppelman So instead of "Jewish life and learning" you propose "Judaism (related to something holy) and Jewish study"?
@ShmuelBrin Does R'Alex appear in those pictures?
Jun 24, 2013 22:10
@msh210 hahah. Maybe "Judaism and Torah study"?
@msh210 no idea. Never saw him,
....but that's not as catchy
@CharlesKoppelman how about just Judaism? Questions about Torah study are about Judaism, after all.
@CharlesKoppelman Clarity's more important IMO.
@msh210 Now that I understand what the site's about, I can agree with that. And I suppose learning is somewhat redundant.
cc @isaacmoses -- all the above, starting at chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/10040000#10040000 and continuing below
Jun 24, 2013 22:12
...the only piece that's missing is "things related to living a Judaism-bound lifestyle" or something
.... like the "how do I deal with coworkers' questions about my kippah?"
@CharlesKoppelman you mean like judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/2326 ?
(I'm using Judaism in an awkward way to distinguish it from Jewish.... )
@msh210 exactly.
I think "Judaism" pretty well covers those. Not every nuance needs to be captured in a catchphrase/summary.
@msh210 But maybe in the In-scope/out-of-scope
@msh210 close reasons are limited to (IIRC) 500 characters, but if they link to something that covers it in more detail, like our on/off-topic meta posts (or help center or whatever), we can be succinct in the close reason. "Judaism" should work there.
Jun 24, 2013 22:15
@CharlesKoppelman Do you mean this page, this page, or the new closure reasons?
@CharlesKoppelman The one I mentioned --
5 mins ago, by msh210
@CharlesKoppelman you mean like http://judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/2326 ?
-- is listed there already. :-)
@msh210 true. But the negative cases are really the issue for me.
@CharlesKoppelman You mean the ones deemed off-topic?
@msh210 yeah. there is very little diversity. It can't all be Israel
Jun 24, 2013 22:21
@CharlesKoppelman There is no subcategory of on-topic topics at meta.judaism.stackexchange.com/q/1473 that clearly includes this question, yet I'd consider it on-topic.
@CharlesKoppelman (2 of the 5 listed history questions are about Israel.) What else are you thinking should be listed there as off-topic?
@msh210 It can be elbowed into "Jewish law or practice (what to do or why)"
@CharlesKoppelman With quite a bit of elbow grease.
nudging the practice over to make room
@CharlesKoppelman Or maybe it needs a separate category there.
@CharlesKoppelman Well, on second thought, I guess it's not so different from judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/119, which is listed there.
I think one day @IsaacMoses came down and said the "How do I wash my tzitzit" sort of thing was exactly the question he had in mind when he founded m.y 1.0
Jun 24, 2013 22:24
@CharlesKoppelman "Moses came down"
@msh210 And Isaac too :)
@msh210 I hope you didn't take me as hostile. I was really just trying to understand where the line is drawn and figure out how to explain it
@CharlesKoppelman Not at all! This conversation has been very helpful in clarifying this stuff in my own mind.
Now we have to see whether all the other site users disagree with everything each of us has said. :-)
@msh210 Meh. I'm sure it can't be hard to convince people that we're right :)
time to head home
@CharlesKoppelman Have an easy fast.
Thanks. You too
 
3 hours later…
Jun 25, 2013 01:24
@msh210 Maybe we need to add language like "how to do it" and/or "how to deal with it." (<-- American convention drilled into me in HS)
Jun 25, 2013 02:12
@CharlesKoppelman Lo beroshi hi. But yeah, it was, and I still think those sorts of questions should be in-scope.
Jun 25, 2013 02:28
@IsaacMoses so do I. I think we should not only tolerate but encourage "how do I actually do this" questions that aren't seeking p'sak, just process.
 
Conversation ended Jun 25, 2013 at 2:28.