Conversation started Jun 28, 2011 at 12:32.
WAF
WAF
Jun 28, 2011 12:32
@msh210 I think we are in a tagging war! judaism.stackexchange.com/posts/5275/revisions
The explanation for my actions lies here: judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/7523/…
 
5 hours later…
Jun 28, 2011 17:06
0
Q: Why is the prepuce still chopped in Judaism?

Josh M.Why is this barbaric ritual still taking place? "God" gave it to them, did s/he also tell them to have it cut off?

... or should I just cut out the offending bits (so to speak) myself?
Jun 28, 2011 17:31
@WAF By the time you're done with him, Josh M. will hopefully have learned enough to answer the question himself!
WAF
WAF
@IsaacMoses Too late. Maybe I shouldn't have made so many assumptions. . .
1
A: Why is the prepuce still chopped?

WAFYes. God commanded Avraham to circumcise his sons and future male descendants. The obligation was derived from that command to apply to all fathers of male children. The relevant sources are laid out by Ramba"m here. There are many mitzvos completion of which necessitates altering something's ...

@WAF I wasn't entirely serious. I was hoping someone would write a simple, well-informed answer like yours.
WAF
WAF
@IsaacMoses I wasn't serious either. I am still hoping s/he will reword the question to fill in the gaps between those assumptions and the answer.
@WAF I linkified "Ramba"m" and "mitzvos" for you. I like to apply a lower jargon threshold when the question is clearly from an outsider's or newcomer's perspective.
@WAF I hope so, too. I think it's fair to assume that Josh is a male.
@WAF How did you pick the particular other mitzvot to list?
WAF
WAF
@IsaacMoses Well I think it's fair to assume certain things too.
@IsaacMoses I was thinking along the lines of {animal, vegetable, mineral} but also had limited time.
Speaking of which, talk to you later!
At some point I would like to discuss the policy on as per this: chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/1228496#1228496
Jun 28, 2011 17:58
@WAF I stand by my comment on the second question you liked to, above, and I therefore support your edit to the first.
@WAF ... not sure how necessary a is, given that we have . Maybe it's a synonym?
@IsaacMoses I sort of thought drush or midrash or medrash or whatever is for the drasha part of the "pardes" and parshanut-torah-comment for the p'shat part.
@IsaacMoses Your comment there makes sense IMO, but then all midrashim -- anything than can get tagged midrash or whatever -- can also be tagged drush. If that's the case then the tag wikis should IMO state that drush is a coarser tag than midrash or whatever.
Jun 28, 2011 18:21
@Isaac, what's the close reason you use for riddles? I've found another.
Also, @Isaac, my brother-in-law is on good terms with the incoming editor of the YU _Commentator_. Do you have a release you want to forward, or something? Should I e-mail you?
@msh210 "not a real question" seems the way to go to me, but I'm just wondering what you used.
@msh210 Midrash is a body of work, a great deal of which does parshanut, but not all. I'd say that should refer to that body of work, should refer to commentary on the Penteteuch (and perhaps the whole Tanach), should perhaps be a synonym of the latter, and where they intersect, they intersect.
@msh210 I started out using NARQ, but switched to Not Constructive and used that for most. I think a comment with reference to the relevant meta post is more important.
@msh210 Please email me. I'll put you in touch with SE's publicist, who probably has a press release for the purpose. In addition, if your b-i-l can arrange the call, I'd be happy to pitch J.SE to the Commentator editor.
@IsaacMoses Okay, thanks, done.
@IsaacMoses I don't know... we definitely need good wikis on whichever we have (keep).
@msh210 Agreed.
 
Conversation ended Jun 28, 2011 at 18:33.