Conversation started Nov 30, 2011 at 9:34.
Nov 30, 2011 09:34
So if I have x_n -> x weakly implies Tx_n -> Tx weakly, where T : X -> Y is a linear map and X,Y are normed spaces, how can I show that T is continuous?
You can force it to be.
: P
What does x_n -> x weakly mean?
(to you)
For all phi in X^*: phi(x_n) -> phi(x)
It barely gets there... it takes forever!
Nov 30, 2011 09:37
I guess I need to do something with phi(Tx_n) -> phi(Tx)...
To show that it's continuous, do I try to show that it's bounded or use the epsilon delta definition?
Did you already try any of them? :-).
I would suggest that you just try and see if it works, that will help you more. If you get stuck you can ask for help (unless you're already stuck of course).
I thought I was stuck already.
It's homework so I have basically zero energy to try stuff. Must be psychological.
Do you know PUB?
The place you go to drink?
So then you know that weakly convergent sequences are bounded.
Principle of uniform boundedness.
Nov 30, 2011 09:48
@JonasTeuwen I only know Pubs...
Uniform boundedness principle? I tried that already
I don't think it fits here
@JonasTeuwen: Thanks, I'll try again!
Assume T is unbounded, then there exists a sequence x_n converging weakly to 0 such that ||T(x_n)|| -> infty.
@Matt: If pubs won't do the work, try pubes.
kinky
(And what do you know about convergent real sequences?)
@JonasTeuwen I think your previous comment answers the question. Or am I missing something?
Nov 30, 2011 09:54
Well, those are bounded hence Tx_n cannot converge weakly.
I think I'm confused.
 
Conversation ended Nov 30, 2011 at 9:56.