Conversation started Oct 11, 2016 at 16:24.
pH13 - Yet another Philipp
pH13 - Yet another Philipp
Oct 11, 2016 16:24
@hBy2Py I thought about that question as being too broad and primarily opinion based and would have closed it. Why didn’t that happen, btw?
Rubisco
Rubisco
Which?
pH13 - Yet another Philipp
pH13 - Yet another Philipp
1 hour ago, by hBy2Py
9
Q: Computational chemistry: research in organic chemistry?

Melanie ShebelI was wondering what research I could do that combines computational chemistry and organic chemistry. For the past three years, I've been using Amber and Gaussian (in hopes) to identify and understand trends in intramolecular interactions of dipeptides. = Organic structure but really computation...

organic-chemistry computational-chemistry
pentavalentcarbon
pentavalentcarbon
That's the thing, it should be closed...it falls under the category of a soft question
Rubisco
Rubisco
Give it a couple of days, then VTC it.
That's what we do to soft questions we like.
They get the input needed and then later, rubbish answers are prevented.
pH13 - Yet another Philipp
pH13 - Yet another Philipp
:)
Rubisco
Rubisco
Oct 11, 2016 16:29
@pH13-YetanotherPhilipp -1 doesn't look evil enough
pH13 - Yet another Philipp
pH13 - Yet another Philipp
:D
Rubisco
Rubisco
Facepalm
orthocresol
orthocresol
I don't think it's that bad.
Rubisco
Rubisco
You've been online too much then. You should get a sleep or a swim or whatever you seals do
orthocresol
orthocresol
It's not opinion-based.
Rubisco
Rubisco
Oct 11, 2016 16:31
It's TB.
orthocresol
orthocresol
If anything, it might be too broad
Rubisco
Rubisco
Tetra-Boron, I mean
orthocresol
orthocresol
That's debatable, I'm refraining from VTCing. Not saying that I think it should remain open I just don't have much of an opinion either way.
Rubisco
Rubisco
@orthocresol Debatable? "What are some things" are always TB.
orthocresol
orthocresol
If you say so.
Rubisco
Rubisco
Oct 11, 2016 16:33
Louder please.
pentavalentcarbon
pentavalentcarbon
She is fortunate there are experienced people here, but it's already attracted some...nonsense.
Rubisco
Rubisco
The computational chemist has spoken.
pentavalentcarbon
pentavalentcarbon
The perfect one to answer would be Martin, he's a trained computational organic chemist.
hBy2Py
hBy2Py
@pH13-YetanotherPhilipp Probably because a 5k user (hi!) jumped on it and answered at length, instead.
pentavalentcarbon
pentavalentcarbon
And then there's this guy...
pH13 - Yet another Philipp
pH13 - Yet another Philipp
Oct 11, 2016 16:37
probably ^^
Rubisco
Rubisco
@hBy2Py Damn rep farmers
hBy2Py
hBy2Py
@Rubisco Yeah, that's me. Shameless what I'll do sometimes.
orthocresol
orthocresol
Close it if you guys want. I just thought it has value
Rubisco
Rubisco
@hBy2Py Go sit in the corner, and think about what you did.
hBy2Py
hBy2Py
@orthocresol I agree, I wouldn't argue if it got closed. I just saw a chance to share some things I'm excited about and took it.
A chat invitation might well have been more appropriate.
orthocresol
orthocresol
Oct 11, 2016 16:38
@hBy2Py I know many people who are interested in this exact area.
pentavalentcarbon
pentavalentcarbon
It does have value, the nonsense is currently contained to the comments.
orthocresol
orthocresol
It's good if they have something valuable to see, at the very least.
Rubisco
Rubisco
@orthocresol Closure doesn't invalue invaluable valued values or whatever. It will just stop additional nonsense from being added.
pH13 - Yet another Philipp
pH13 - Yet another Philipp
I never said, that I don’t like the question. I’m happy about every question that is comp chem related. ^^
Rubisco
Rubisco
That's biased.
orthocresol
orthocresol
Oct 11, 2016 16:40
Then close it. It's not like I have a veto.
 
Conversation ended Oct 11, 2016 at 16:40.