Conversation started Feb 12, 2016 at 13:24.
Feb 12, 2016 13:24
Hi, everybody!!
I'm not sure emphasizing is a gerund or a present participle here..
Hi! @KinzleB
For me (without going into any technicality), it works like an adjective in that one.
I think it's a gerund, like in "I like singing".
"[It] is just barely mentioned and could stand emphasizing in that or another answer."
~ (approx. =) "[It] is just barely mentioned and could be emphasizing in that or another answer."
The comments below said it could be reworded as "could stand being emphasized"
If I'm not mistaken. It's similar to these: She is tall. He stayed high. They stood tall.
@KinzleB Could being is weird, I think.
Feb 12, 2016 13:30
sorry, edited
Oh, I see!
Hi, @KinzleB. Good question; I differ with @Dam and take it to be a gerund object of transitive stand -- and it is the implicit object of emphasize! "It could tolerate [emphasizing it]." The passive version would be "It could stand being emphasized".
Ahh
Hmm... "It could tolerate emphasizing (it)" with it omitted?
Yes. Obligatorily omitted -- that's the idiom. Much like "It needs/wants emphasizing."
Feb 12, 2016 13:34
Thank you :) could I add an indefinite article between "stand" and "emphasizing"? I got lots of examples of "could stand a refurbishing" in Google Books.
And like those, it accommodates a passive infinitival: "It could stand to be emphasized".
@KinzleB I found none!
But I found 17 hits of "could stand refurbishing".
sorry, just Google search
@KinzleB In that case the gerund is fully deverbal. I don't think you'd use emphasize that way; the more ordinary noun would be employed, and only if it took some modifier: "It could stand an emphasis of some sort", "It could stand more emphasis".
 
Conversation ended Feb 12, 2016 at 13:37.