Conversation started May 6, 2012 at 10:11.
May 6, 2012 10:11
I think many large OSS projects are adopting a silo approach.
Collaboration and standards slow progress, and intuitively
I think GNOME and Ubuntu and KDE, etc know that rapid progress is needed now
Lest the iPads take over the world more fully than PCs ever did
I disagree on that particular point. I don't think rapid progress is needed
we'll just diverge on that one
The "devices" approach to computing is murdering Software Freedom.
Stuff that Microsoft would never dare to do in the 90s is done by Apple every week nowadays
I mean, even at the height of Microsoft's monopoly, "trusted boot" was tossed.
OSS just needs to put in non-commercial clauses in everything. libpng and openssh vulns that affect all consumer electronics? yes.
May 6, 2012 10:15
Nowadays, you are hard-pressed to find an open bootloader tablet
@JacobJohanEdwards true
i may have a different idea of software freedom though
Well, yes, but presumably your version of software freedom doesn't involve software users' having no right to modify software on their own hardware.
29
Q: Should "move-to-chat" be provided on demand (as a button perhaps)?

CatskulWhen comments get too chatty the move-to-chat feature asks if you'd like to move it out. But this often happens after the fact and thus doesn't prevent it. I propose that: Move-to-chat be provided as a button along side so that a user who knows their question or conversation may become drawn ...

3
Someone has suggested it ^
@jokerdino ignored though... :(
I am going to write an answer. including parts of our convo..
May 6, 2012 10:19
@JacobJohanEdwards oh, it does allow users to modify on their own. just not for commercial gain. joe at home has every right to modify software on his own hardware. he does not have the right to put a slick UI on top of it and sell a proprietary version.
i think i misread your statement, hence the edit that essentially reversed part of the meaning
@aking1012 I don't mind non-commercial FOSS. I am in favor of whatever kind of FOSS prevents a future of big-brother / centrally-managed / restricted-capability computing
And with the iPad soaring, I see that future brewing.
That's why I think FOSS needs rapid progress.
there will be a modder community that keeps up with chipset changes
Even so, it gets more and more inaccessible.
maybe. i think you're trying to persuade me. and i'm not going to be persuaded on this one.
Mac OS X is now a flip switch away from only being able to install Apple-approved software
May 6, 2012 10:25
python. nuff said
Oh? And who's to say Apple wouldn't sandbox /usr/bin/python so-as to only be used for approved software?
that's already possible with AppArmor on Linux
Without root access, any form of restriction is feasible.
it's possible. but saying you can't run python scripts on removable media would be atrocious
Atrocious, but possible.
i have severe doubts that will happen
they would lose Dino as a fanboy if they did that
There is tremendous will to make it happen. The idea of things like that makes big content cream its pants.
I mean, heck, Intel is now hard-burning DRM into their CPUs
Who would have imagined that ten years ago?
May 6, 2012 10:30
I've always been an AMD ATI guy
All the way back to cyrix chips that doubled as space heaters
And, if people could only access big content from Intel chips, don't you think AMD would buckle under the pressure?
Firefox is buckling under H.264 and video DRM, and they're the most idealistic game in town
nope. new media will change that, or there will be media gateways
ok. hold your argument - meta.stackoverflow.com/a/131566/177471 - i just wrote some crap ready to be downvoted.
I don't like how Meta.SO looks. AU looks far better.
It's all about the ability to change software on devices. If consumers have the right to change software on their devices -- which according to DCMA, they don't -- then all DRM is pointless and can be worked around. Otherwise, the most Orweillian nightmares of computing's future are possible.
@jokerdino upvoted
thanks both of you.
May 6, 2012 10:34
@JacobJohanEdwards I own a beagleboard. Telling me I can't put something on dev-gear? not going to happen
or i'll move to another country when i can't buy hardware and install the software i want
If they are going to restrict power users, I will move to whatever that allows me to do whatever I want.
@aking1012 Once 95% of people use appliances (eg non-rooted restricted computers), it's quite possible that general computers will require a license to buy.
This will be sold to the populace as security against hackers, piracy, CP, etc
Basically, only CS people will get them
see my last comment
are we not merely imagining stuff here?
yes...he's trying to modify my current point of view with a highly unlikely chain of possible future events
May 6, 2012 10:38
concern troll Boo
@jokerdino @aking1012 think you're both falling victim to frog-in-water syndrome. Every year, new restrictions are being laid down. And these new restrictions are directed by money interests. It follows that money will continue to be interested in more restrictions.
okay, this had relevance to ubuntu about 5 conversation forks ago. now i'm not sure it does. i think i'm done
@aking1012 Okay, fun talking with you
 
Conversation ended May 6, 2012 at 10:41.