Loading Discussion on question by Mike_bb: Kock-Lawvere axiom. Am I right that after finding set of $\varepsilon$ we must check elements of this set?
Just a second…

load older messages full transcript highlights

	You must be logged in to talk. See the faq for more information.		$Mathematics$
		help \| faq \| legal \| privacy policy \| mobile

View all rooms $Mathematics$ View all site rooms

Discussion on question by Mike_bb: Kock-Lawvere axiom. Am I right that after finding set of $\varepsilon$ we must check elements of this set?

Imported from a comment discussion on math.stackexchange.com/questions/4789802/…

Code of Conduct

Learn more about Chat

axioms logic

Welcome to the chat! Unfortunately, you have JavaScript disabled, and thus this chat will not work. If you would like to participate, please enable JavaScript in your browser and reload this page.

New feed items

Discussion on question by Mike_bb: Kock-Lawvere axiom. Am I right that after finding set of $\varepsilon$ we must check elements of this set?