Loading Discussion on question by Tooster: License like LGPL-3.0, but owner can sell source to 3rd party freely and contributors can't say no or revoke code
Just a second…

load older messages full transcript highlights

	You must be logged in to talk. See the faq for more information.
		help \| faq \| legal \| privacy policy \| mobile

View all rooms

View all site rooms

Discussion on question by Tooster: License like LGPL-3.0, but owner can sell source to 3rd party freely and contributors can't say no or revoke code

Imported from a comment discussion on opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/14254/…

Code of Conduct

Learn more about Chat

contributor-agreements licensing

Welcome to the chat! Unfortunately, you have JavaScript disabled, and thus this chat will not work. If you would like to participate, please enable JavaScript in your browser and reload this page.

New feed items

Discussion on question by Tooster: License like LGPL-3.0, but owner can sell source to 3rd party freely and contributors can't say no or revoke code