Conversation started Sep 21, 2012 at 15:40.
Sep 21, 2012 15:40
Hey guys
Could anybody please tell me what kind of lens has been used to capture this photo?
I mean, the subject is not much close to the camera, and her background is still blurred.
"normal" lens by the look of it. 50mm on FF and around 35mm on APS-S would be my guess - it's a very wide aperture though
the info was there, wasn't it. just needed to open my eyes
lens: Noctilux-M 50mm f/0.95 Asph
Oh I didn't notice the info there
hahah
i would say that @HåkonK.Olafsen is right!
f/.95 must be nice
So the blurred background is because of the very low aperture f/0.9
i was in awe of the f/1.2 85mm canon when i had it
Sep 21, 2012 15:47
the image says f1.4 was used
@Meysam - yes, and the focal length also plays into that(50mm)
so it's doable with gear from other manufactures too
@Meysam - the blurred background is called "bokeh". we have lots of info here and on wikipedia about it. But a LARGE aperture such as f/.9 f/1.8 f/2.8 would all give you a similar effect
@HåkonK.Olafsen You are right f1.4 has been used
the other end of the spectrum would be a narrow aperture such as f/16
a narrow aperture gives a wide depth of field, or shows everything in focus with very little bokeh
Sep 21, 2012 15:49
With my kit lens (18-55) I can never achieve such photo!
I have to move forward and buy another lens!
@Meysam what format do you have? Nikon, pentax, canon, sony, etc?
@dpollitt Canon 650D
@Meysam I would certainly take a good look at the Canon 50mm f/1.8 lens. It is very reasonably price at around $120 and can achieve a very similar image to the one that you linked to.
@dpollitt Although it's not a zoom lens, its large aperture size (1.8) is really worth it!
You can also just use your kit lens at 55mm, and put it in aperture priority mode, and select your widest aperture possible such as f/3.5 or f/5.6. It won't be quite as nice as the 50mm f/1.8, but it still should give some OK bokeh/background blur
@Meysam yes exactly! the f/1.8 is the advantage.
Sep 21, 2012 15:54
the Canon 50mm f1.8 is a bargain - don't expect L quality, but for that price it's a very good investment
@HåkonK.Olafsen I still use it sometimes even with all of my L glass because it is so tiny! Great for bringing into concerts.
@dpollitt I have tried it, f3.5 is not that good. Only useful when subject is very close
it might feel at bit long on a 650 though
I would really like a 30mm f1.8 or somthing
@Meysam It sounds like you are on the right path to get a lens like the 50mm f/1.8 . Once you understand the limitations of your current gear its a great time to upgrade.
that don't cost me half an arm
Sep 21, 2012 15:55
@HåkonK.Olafsen i agree... but you could always upgrade to FF and keep the 50 :)
@dpollitt You are right. And 50mm f/1.8 seems a good choice for the moment
I've had the 50mm f/1.8 for about 8 years and still love it, even though I own the somewhat better 50mm f/1.4 :)
@dpollitt My GF is more into birds and wildlife - so a cropped sensor fit quite well for us, but maybe we should just get another camera!
buy the 5DIII as backup! :P
@dpollitt Do you think it's a good idea for me to go for larger apertures, like f/1.4?
if you really like wide angle wide apertures, full frame might be the only way. but if you do birds, then crop might be the only way!
@Meysam if you only have the kit 18-55 right now, the 50mm f/1.8 is going to seem like a HUGE jump. it is enough for most all people. the f/1.4 is just a BIT better, and better built for professional use.
it look me at least a few years to outgrow the 50mm f/1.8 and decide i wanted the f/1.4
Sep 21, 2012 16:02
be right back
we havin' a good ol' fashion flame war?!
@Shizam no no! why do you say that
because I just had my morning coffee and am ready for some excitement :)
w/the H5D announced I bet you could get a great deal on a H4D-50, maybe now is the time to jump to Hasselblad!
Sep 21, 2012 16:19
ha i'd rather not jump
I need to win the lottery first (and I'm not playing)
@dpollitt Alright, thanks for the advice!
@Meysam no problem, good luck!
sitting at work at 18:30 on a Friday... woho
I think I'll have to order a Panasonic GH3 for work, just to try it out. Looks like it have some nice video features. imaging-resource.com/news/2012/09/17/…
@dpollitt Some guys also recommended this: bhphotovideo.com/c/product/870179-REG/…
Sep 21, 2012 16:30
the 40mm is also very nice, but it costs more and have a smaller aperture
@Meysam yea that is a nice lens. It would be very good for video. I personally still prefer the much larger aperture of the 50mm f/1.8
The new STM technology is its advantage I guess
exactly
My "18-55" is actually a 17-55 f/2.8 lens. So if I get a prime like a 50mm lens, i want something bigger than f/2.8, such as f/1.8 or f/1.4
I think for most photographers the 40mm f/2.8 is more of a "fun" addition, and not exactly the best performance per dollar or the best 2nd lens to buy
but lens decisions are very personal :) we all have our favorites
Is there only one type of 50mm f/1.8 (Canon)? Or are there different types of them based on their characteristics? (like STM, IS, ...)
only one 50mm f1.8
they have a f1.4 and a f1.2, but all are non-IS and not STM
the 1.4 and 1.2 have USM focus motors
Sep 21, 2012 16:35
@HåkonK.Olafsen Do you think lacking IS is a big deal?
not for that kind of lens
@Meysam it is debatable. it is becoming more common to include IS in short prime lenses, but i would say it is still uncommon
since you have a large aperture and the lens isn't too long, you can usually shoot hand held it quite dim conditions
^-- what Hakon says is what most people argue.
in*
but then again, I'm looking at buying the 24 or 28mm f2.8 IS myself ;)
Sep 21, 2012 16:38
I would love a 50mm f/1.4 with IS, but it doesn't exist for Canon as far as I know. STM is brand new, so only a few lenses have that.
heh.. sigma's new 30mm f2.8 looks funny
@HåkonK.Olafsen You mean you don't need larger apertures?
@Meysam no, just that I think my style of shooting would benefit from IS, and f2.8 is wide enough (for me)
but for kind of picture like the one you linked too, you probably need at least f2
@HåkonK.Olafsen yea that is odd looking. i do like some of the other new sigma designs though.
I am also interested in Macro photography. I know it might need an expensive lens, I am asking just to know. What aperture is more appropriate for macro photography?
Sep 21, 2012 16:45
typically in macro photography the issue is getting the MOST depth of field, which requires a small aperture such as f/16, f/22 etc
so a large aperture is much less important, unless you are hand holding the lens. Most people use a tripod for true macro work
you might want to look at the Canon 100mm f/2.8 That is a very popular lens and only $500
not always though, if you want to separate a flower from the leafs of a plant you still need a fairly large aperture
@dpollitt And what factor determines how close I can get to the subject?
that would be the "Minimum Focus Distance" or MFD of a lens
@dpollitt Should be possible to calculate it based on the focal length, I guess!
@Meysam i'm not really sure. I dont do much macro. I have cheap extension tubes(around $20) that I use with my other lenses, i dont have a true macro lens
Sep 21, 2012 16:50
Are extension tubes used as an alternative to changing lens?
the minimum focus distance is related to the focal length, but not only that. But most macro lenses will include the MFD in the specifications, should be fairly easy to find
what's SmugMug?
online photosharing and print sales platform :)
@Shizam It's interesting that it has a beta site on SE: smugmug.stackexchange.com
SmugMug is awesome - we started using it last year, and couldn't be more happy
Sep 21, 2012 16:57
@Shizam There are many similar websites. One that I know is www.deviantart.com
@HåkonK.Olafsen I will start using it today then :)
ah, deviantart.com is pretty different from smugmug.com
you should make up your own mind, but it's not too costly (at least for us living in Norway), it integrates well into iPhoto, Aperture and Lightroom, give you the ability to password protect areas +++
yea we started a stackexchange because as a platform there are a lot of questions :)
there is good question about it on the site
@HåkonK.Olafsen Are Aperture and Lightroom name of some softwares?
Sep 21, 2012 17:02
yes
Aperture is iPhoto on steroids and Lightroom is Adobe's photo archive system
archive + development
here we go, question with good answers about photo sharing sites: photo.stackexchange.com/questions/295/…
(I really should try to finish off work for today)
@HåkonK.Olafsen Thank you for sharing it :)
I forgot to ask: Does "50mm f/1.8" (and all fixed lenses in general) have a focus ring on them?
Sep 21, 2012 17:18
all lenses (afaik) have a focus ring on them
the focus ring on the 50mm f1.8 isn't great though, so I very rarely focus manually with it
but since it's f1.8 the autofocus shouldn't have too many problems
 
1 hour later…
Sep 21, 2012 18:43
@HåkonK.Olafsen How is it not great? What sort of difficulty do you have with it? I am asking because manually focusing with my 18-55 lens is very easy.
Sep 21, 2012 18:55
@Meysam - the focus ring on the 50mm f/1.8 is really small, and situated at the end of the lens. It just isn't that great for manual focusing due to its construction
Sep 21, 2012 19:09
@dpollitt Got it
anyone have the sigma 18-50mm 2.8 OS HSM?
I tossed my kit lens ages ago. But now I have inconvenient 10-20 mm 28-135mm and fixed 28mm 1.8
@MichaelNielsen Why inconvenient?
at decent prices theres sigma 18-55m, canon 18-55 IS II , and tamron 18-sometihng crazy that looks like crap
but isnt the canon 18-55mm IS (not USM) the new kit lens? so it will be almost as bad as the kit lens I tossed?
sigma 18-50
sigma seems hte best choice. I saw reviews saying it is the king of budget lenses
it is in convenient missing 20-28mm, when my camera is apsc
Is it possible to mount sigma lenses on all cameras?
the 28-135mm isnt wide enough for tourist photogreaphy
and 10-20 makes funny images, you cant just run around blasting pictures with that
Sep 21, 2012 19:18
@MichaelNielsen Funny because of being very wide?
they sell them "for canon" "for nikon" etc
Ill show a "funny pic" with teh 10mm lens
Ok, let us see
its cool and can make amazing images
but you dont want it as a walkaround always on lens
I do have a 1.4x extender, which is now teh only way I can get 20-28mm
but that affects extra distortion and an Fstop
@MichaelNielsen You are right, wide lenses are not a good choice for portraits like this!
 
Conversation ended Sep 21, 2012 at 19:23.