Conversation started Feb 3, 2016 at 19:57.
Feb 3, 2016 19:57
You can't see it but I'm rubbing my temples in a vain effort to contain my amazed fury at this flare-up in Meta.
@waxeagle - I'm going to possibly-unfairly blame you but since you're the querent you win the prize: where in God's name do you get off with this?
@Lord_Gareth hey, I volunteered, it's quite all right if you want to blame me. But I'll say this, if the tag kept going the way it was, it was going to get deleted.
Define 'the way it was'. No one but Mxy has been stirring up about it.
And as has been recently pointed out, again
And if I sound bitter, I am.
This shit, right here, is why I've been absent for so long.
Because I was done dealing with his abuse of power and childish temper tantrums.
I'll say it right now. Take 5 and calm down.
11 messages moved from RPG General Chat
So, y'know, go on.
Justify it to my face there buddy.
Feb 3, 2016 20:03
Here's the thing, in order for a tag to have merit, it has to be meaningful. It can't have the potential to be used on every question.
By normal tagging standards, many of our tags, are actually meta tags.
RAW is one of those tags. In that sense, it requires more justification than "this is an RPG concept" to merit it's existence.
At the outset of mxy's post, I was actually quite in favor of culling the tag. It's something that, without careful application, actually could apply to most of the questions we ask/answer.
@Lord_Gareth Not helpful, particularly not with the one-third of the team who isn't already predisposed against you
Because, our normal process for answering rules questions is "what does the book say, how does that work in a game, is this an adequate rule etc"
if that's all that RAW means, then it's not a good tag.
@waxeagle The issue here goes way, way beyond tagging theory
@KRyan ALL I care about is tagging theory
tagging is only secondary to the fact that the tag serves as the only shield this segment of the community has against mxyzplk's bigotry
Feb 3, 2016 20:06
petty disputes about playstyles can go to hell. this is about tagging.
so you want to have a serious discussion about tagging theory?
don't have a bigot who has actively persecuted this segment of the community for years as your most prominent, vocal team member
because that is the primary concern in my mind
it is not about tagging
it is about trying to protect a segment of the community against a moderator who has for years tried to drive them out
very successfully, I might add!
I don't know much about mxyzplk. Why do you say that he's been driving out RAW questions?
Look, I get that. I've had my issues with mxy on a bunch of things, we're in relative agreement on this one though. What we're asking is for people to look critically at the tag during this period and make a fair and open evaluation of it following the period.
Feb 3, 2016 20:09
well
On a just-tag-use thing, it should be notable that the RPG community often has a notable bias for or against RAW as a concept; tagging the question, as has been brought up before, communicates the sort of answers you're looking for. Looking for those answers can be valuable for a lot of reasons.
I have a question that still was not satisfactorily answered by the community because Mxy picked a fight in it
@waxeagle the issue here is that it cannot be fair and open as long as the man is involved in it
@Smurfton questions, answers, and members
@Lord_Gareth we get that, which is why we're taking a month to look at the tag and announcing it at week before we start to get comments
he has been slightly better lately, but has never been one to keep himself unbiased
Feb 3, 2016 20:10
@Forrestfire I disagree. Strongly.
@Smurfton this is his personal blog http://geek-related.com/2010/06/19/i-hate-the-raw/
>You know what? It’s time to bring back some of the pejorative terms of gaming 20 years ago.
>Rules lawyers. Munchkins. Power gamers. Monty Haulers. You’re on notice. Somehow your filthy habits have become mainstreamed, over Gary Gygax’s dead body apparently. But you’re not welcome, around here at least.
this is an attitude he has strongly conveyed through his posts and comments for years
that
And I can't be the only person who remembers him snidely declaring that he's free to flame "munchkins" in chat all he wants.
@waxeagle How so? In what way does an avowed, passionate, and proud bigot add to this discussion? How can this segment of the community seriously consider the moderation team to be treating them fairly and honestly while he is on it?
Nor am I the only person still angry about this
Feb 3, 2016 20:13
@KRyan because he's not the only one on the moderation team. And frankly, if you don't trust us to perform this, why did you recently elect 2/3rds of us?
@waxeagle I fought tooth and nail against d7's election, for all I do have a lot of respect for his ability to largely lay aside his personal feelings
^-
There's gonna be a lot of me posting those two arrows.
I was deeply disturbed by his commitment to the idea that the moderation team can or should do what they think is best in contradiction of the community consensus
and I never voted for mxyzplk
almost no one on this site did
@KRyan that's a standard SE policy.
Feb 3, 2016 20:14
How does that work?
@Smurfton he was voted in when the site first graduated, and few people are still around from back then
in any event, the site was vastly smaller
More importantly, mods are for-life in SE
for good reason, on larger stacks
So there's no meaningful way to remove him without a massive backlog of evidence we have no access to.
yes, that's relatively besides the point.
Feb 3, 2016 20:15
I mean, if I could give up my day job and devote four months just to digging up the dirt, cool.
But hey, I like eating and having a home
@Lord_Gareth Whut? Why is a mod a for life position?
well, you couldn't even if you had time, cuz comments are deleted
@Ahriman in large part because it's a volunteer position
@Lord_Gareth also probably not helping
I'll resume seething quietly.
Feb 3, 2016 20:17
Doesn't that clash with the principle of elections?
I would like to be able to come back here, in all honesty. I have a lot of folks that I like and respect. I have a great respect for the goal of the Stack format.
But in all honesty, I left because I felt unwelcome.
@Ahriman typically elections are additive or for replacement
I still feel unwelcome.
And I am bloody furious about it
I've felt unwelcome for the entirety of my time here
@KRyan Personally, I've always been impressed by SevenSided's commitment to cleaning up posts on this site. Even if he had loads of personal opinions that I strongly disagreed with and didn't like, I would still vote for him.
Feb 3, 2016 20:18
Is there a way to signal friction between a community & mods?
@Ahriman my understanding is to typically start with a meta, and then escalate to SE itself
@Ahriman meta is that way typically, after that contacting the SE community team
but SE doesn't like to get involved in community affairs they're unfamiliar with
so you need a lot of evidence
which, ya know
Basically the only way to actually have it work is to stalk their posts for months and get proof of their problematic behavior
Who would be the representative of the community?
Feb 3, 2016 20:19
Which, again, see: need to eat, sleep, and be employed
which would have to be grabbed as it happens, because comments get deleted
as a result, moderators on as small a community as this one have effectively zero oversight and are pretty much immune to criticism
Sometimes after a few hours
...
That's rather toxic
welcome to rpg.stackexchange
@Ahriman most of the time it's really not
Feb 3, 2016 20:20
leave your "caring about the rules" at the door, lest myx jump down your throat.
I thought he ignored the RAW tag?
because as he said on his blog, you are not welcome
@Forrestfire tbf, I'm a RAW enthusiast who's managed to do just fine here...
he has been leading an ongoing crusade against the concept for years.
@waxeagle you also, as I recall, don't play the same systems he does
and are you really telling me you haven't seen him attacking other members of this site?
Feb 3, 2016 20:21
@KRyan also true.
if so, go check the flags on him
I know I have flagged him dozens of times
I admit, I never had much trouble with him (being new). Mostly because of diffirent game systems
and they were usually accepted
@KRyan no, I'm not.
Isn't this mostly a DnD issue?
Feb 3, 2016 20:23
like I said, I'm much more interested in the tag side of this discussion. I understand it provides value to a community on this site, and we want to see what we can do to keep it from falling into uselessness.
@Ahriman RAW is typically a D&Dism, but it's not solely D&D
@waxeagle can't seriously have that discussion while mxyzplk is a moderator
@KRyan Wouldn't that be a good argument, in and of itself that Mxyzplk is not a good representative of the community?
that's just how it is
@Smurfton I don't really know
I haven't acted because I'm terrified that whatever I do won't be convincing enough
and it'll blow the opportunity to get rid of him
make his case stronger
@waxeagle - Our stance here is that any actual problems with the tag can neither be examined properly nor acted upon while Mxy is involved in the process. Here, lemme dig up the thing.
The whole point of SE is that the high rep users are role models for the low rep ones, especially the mods.
Feb 3, 2016 20:24
@Smurfton no kidding
@Lord_Gareth The tag is getting evaluated. You have the choice of whether to be part of that evaluation and defining the process thereof or not.
@waxeagle True, I have answered some RAW questions for not DnD systems
As long as mxy isn't removing posts on the subject, or overriding the community's decisions, I do not see what the problem is.
Again, this is an alternative to destroying the tag
@waxeagle - What'd I do wrong here: rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/31062/…
Feb 3, 2016 20:25
Yes he's more vocal, and his voice is very loud, but still.
destroying the tag would be better
And the community weighed well against destroying the tag, as it has every time it's come up
@Forrestfire don't agree there
At this point you're coming down against consensus for no discenible reason
destroying the tag would be better, because at the very least
it's an actual sign that the RAW community is no longer welcome
rather than deceptively continuing to house a bigot, and even putting him in charge of handling the people he's bigoted against
if rpg.stackexchange is to go down this road, they should be open and transparent about it
Feb 3, 2016 20:26
for reference, SE on moderation: A Theory of Moderation
> 1. As a moderator, your actions now represent the community, so you will be held to a higher standard of behavior. You are an ambassador of trust, with the same sorts of rights that the official development team and community coordinators have.
not only has mxyzplk gratuitously not been that
wow, Gareth's comment calling out myx got removed
he vigorously denied any higher standard for himself
@Forrestfire was that removed by mxyz?
I don't know
and then on the subject of suspensions: A Day in the Penalty Box, wherein it's quite clear that even if mods did not have higher standards, he does not meet the regular ones
Feb 3, 2016 20:31
If you do want to do this, but don't feel willing to spend all of the time required, we can trade off.
Wax, Mxy has picked this fight in Meta for two years running now, by his own admission in the last question. Every time he has, the community has chosen to preserve the tag.
Look guys, at the end of the day, the moderators still have a job to do. If you don't trust us to do it, you know the channels to go through, contact the community team. This is a tag that needs a cleanup, you guys are the principals in the tag, it's going to happen y'all can help define how it's going to happen.
2
...
And we're telling you that we have absolutely no faith that it's going to happen.
And you're ignoring that lack of faith.
@waxeagle True. I don't disagree that it has problems right now.
So basically
"We get that you have no faith in us. However, we're not going to look into it."
Feb 3, 2016 20:33
^-
"Go above us, which won't work for reasons listed"
@waxeagle you have no evidence that there is anything wrong with the tag
my god, man
@KRyan which is why the first thing we're doing is collecting evidence
there is a problem sensed, now we're trying to observe why is this an issue?
except that that's not what's being proposed here
>Aggressively police answers on RAW posts to remove answers that rely primarily on house rules or common sense interpretations.
Collecting evidence to support the crusade of a power-mad bigot who's been grinding an axe for two years
Feb 3, 2016 20:34
(more than that)
(not helpful)
Do you really think we see that as a gesture of good freaking faith, Eagle?
At the very least, the tag wiki and the meta decision should agree.
Which, as Nitsua kindly pointed out, they don't
There is no problem sensed, there's one man offended at the idea that the world has fun a way he doesn't.
Compare this situation vs. the difficulties had awhile back in Fate questions, where they weren't being answered for, honestly, bad reasons.
The latter was an actual problem, which was addressed and resolved once, and has never had to come up again.
This is crocodile tears. It's abuse of power.
@waxeagle The problem, at this point, is that a not-insignificant portion of the community has lost faith in the moderation team for reasons that the mod team seems to feel are irrational. This will poison any interaction that the community feels strongly about until either reconciliation is made or everyone involved leaves.
5
Even honest attempts to be even-handed about a specific topic are gonna be met with reasonable suspicion if the people overseeing it are visible indifferent to fairness in other areas. By now it's fruit of the poisoned tree until the underlying conflict is at least acknowledged as more than a flight of paranoid delusion.
3
@Smurfton in general the site does not do enough to maintain tag wikis
Feb 3, 2016 20:37
(Heya @BESW how's life been?)
@KRyan I personally would, except that tag wikis have always seemed like something I really shouldn't be touching.
There's also a LOT of tags.
I wouldn't, as I remain allergic to power and still wish I didn't have the stuff the site's already given me.
@Smurfton if you have the rep, you have the privilege and by definition it means you can and should; if you don't, it will be reviewed
obviously, only touch tags you're familiar with
@Lord_Gareth Outside of this trash, busy but pretty good. I've got an awesome RPG group. In the last few sessions we imploded a robot Elon Musk and fought giant termites that threw Force lightning.
3
@BESW awesome
Feb 3, 2016 20:39
@KRyan Problem: I don't actually play rpgs. I've played every once in a while, but never really had regular sessions.
...I feel like I should know that name
But it eludes me
@Smurfton ah, a shame
@Lord_Gareth Tesla, hyperloop?
@Lord_Gareth Elon Musk was one of the founders of PayPal, and rolled that money into Tesla Motors and SpaceX
Thank you.
Feb 3, 2016 20:40
@Lord_Gareth PayPal, electric cars, privatised space rockets, a strong fear of artificial intelligence.
@KRyan My rep is all from finding questions that can be answered with research.
:/
also! Elon Musk was Robert Downey Jr's primary inspiration for Tony Stark.
In any event @waxeagle BESW's expressed our thoughts here pretty well and/or diplomatically.
who?
In our setting Weird stuff (mad science, magic) is getting to be a massive problem on Earth, and Elon Musk has set out to fix it.
Feb 3, 2016 20:41
And as a personal addition, it's difficult for me to accept the idea that I have to be the grown-up, to shut up and be good while the other person in the conflict continues to be abusive, hostile, and abrasive. There's being the bigger person and then there's accepting victimization.
yeah, he said it far more eloquently than I could have.
@Smurfton Musk has already been answered, see above if you meant him. RDJ is an actor who portrayed Tony Stark in recent movies. Tony Stark is a comic-book character, also known as Iron Man.
And I feel like I'm being asked, consistently, to be quiet and remain a victim.
While our PCs work for a group with the motto Using Weird stuff so Weird stuff doesn't use you, Musk is Destroying Weird stuff so Weird stuff doesn't Destroy you.
Feb 3, 2016 20:42
@BESW this is so cool
I want to play with you guys
same here.
he showed me one of his enemies and I'm like "this is awesome"
He has a squadron of telepresence androids (not AI, because he's afraid of AI) that he calls Musketeers, which he uses for dangerous missions.
didn't realize Elon Musk was one of the people afraid of AI; there's quite a few of them at this point, and they're serious people worth paying attention to
And for the record this isn't my idea. One of my players came to me with Musk and his Musketeers all statted up already and said, "I was going to play this guy, but I think he's an antagonist. Here."
Feb 3, 2016 20:44
ahahaha
that's awesome
@Lord_Gareth he tends to :).
@KRyan and @Lord_Gareth I was hoping our collective history would allow for some measure of trust on this subject.
>Musketeers
that's amazing
Did he completely replace your original plans, or are your original plans still out there, biding their time, or whatever evil bad guys do while they wait for heroes?
Our first encounter with him, we were trying to save an Atlantean colony ship from falling into the Sun. I added Musk as an unexpected complication: Musk blames the ship for the Weird Stuff escalation on Earth and showed up trying to implode with it Downvote-class black hole missiles fired from his interplanetary warship Negative Feedback.
@waxeagle you're not the whole team, sad to say. And while d7 does an admirable job of keeping his opinions on rules-as-written out of his interactions with the site, he's not perfect either—and here he is being directly asked for his opinion on them, so he cannot avoid interacting with them
Feb 3, 2016 20:47
Should the conversation about BESW's table be moved back to RPG general chat, or is nobody still interested in discussing mods and RAW?
@Smurfton I really need to head back to work
We Skyped him to ask him to stop, but he hung up on us and kept firing, so we hacked his ship (which used open-source software) and set off all the missiles in his weapons bay.
@waxeagle I like you well enough. My irritation at the situation aside, I still like you. But you're 1/3rd of the team and the vocal face of that team is still, you guessed it, the problem child. You're bringing up questions of site policy and asking me to trust a majority out of three composed of folks I don't trust at all. Even if I had absolute trust in you personally, that's not a fair expectation.
Why should I have any faith that you can keep things fair on your own?
(And let me tell you, setting up a Skype call between a 4,000-year-old Atlantean colony ship and a modern warship is not easy. One of the PCs had to use her plant powers to grow a modern antenna array out of the metal trees on the ship.)
3
Feb 3, 2016 20:52
(Luckily, another PC had just spent the last adventure lost in time and space, and it turned out he'd spent some time in Atlantis and added a Linux emulator to the colony ship's programming. We used that to hook up the array to someone's tablet.)
@BESW - On my end of things DSP is about to be kickstarting my first novel
4
I am massively hype.
@BESW this just keeps getting so much cooler
@Lord_Gareth Sweet.
@KRyan Again, this is almost all my players.
@BESW lucky you
I mean, we have a pretty sweet group
Feb 3, 2016 21:03
I'm very happy to have such an awesome group.
Pic related, @BESW
And Fate is the perfect system for us to enable everyone to bring ideas to the table.
indeed
Nice.
I really love Fate
need more opportunity to play it
Feb 3, 2016 21:04
If time zones weren't such an issue, I'd be more able to do more gaming online with RPG.SE folks.
@BESW yeah, I get that
I am not available at any times reasonable for you
But the next time you're on Guam, come on by. Geek Night is every Saturday, we usually start around 1930.
@BESW hah, that'd be sweet
I'm getting much closer this summer, but will be busy (honeymoon in Tahiti)
Grats!
thanks
Feb 3, 2016 21:07
Greener and one of his friends Skype into our games, but they're in the same time zone.
mm
huh, ironically if you ran a game at like noon... in the middle of the week... it would actually fit my schedule perfectly
:P
Some weeks that's workable.
you're so far away that it wraps back around to being conceivable
That feel when your players are debating whether or not they want to bring someone back to life with cancer as a potential side effect.
Being freelance means I'm busy, but I often get to choose when to be busy.
Feb 3, 2016 21:10
we actually game with a girl from Australia, but she's crazy and doesn't sleep
...that sounds like a Lines & Veils moment might be in order.
@BESW his players are playing his "quest" on 4chan
lines and veils, uh.
don't come up much there
@KRyan ...oh. 4chan is a lines & veils moment.
...Lines & veils?
42
A: What do the terms "lines" and "veils" mean?

Alex PDefinitions We all have our limits and boundaries. Lines and veils are different ways to handle those boundaries in play. A line is, well, a line — a hard limit, something we do not want to cross. Lines represent places we don't want to go in roleplaying. "There is no torture in the event...

My group has lines and veils on suicide, spiders, cannibalism...
Feb 3, 2016 21:13
I see
Nifty
I've attempted to remain classy and respectful about a variety of subjects here but the consequences of violence and medical care have often been...well, up-front.
The PoV character's a necromancer, it's kinda relevant to the themes.
@BESW to be fair, the people in his quest have so far been pretty chill
at least for that subset of 4chan, I'm getting a much more favorable impression than their reputation lead me to expect
(also, his writing is pretty sweet)
anyway, heading home
later folks
I gotta go teach Power Authority folks how to use MS Word.
@BESW Spiders?
Always nice to chat games with you guys. ttfn
Feb 3, 2016 21:24
@Smurfton By me. A comment whose content can be summarised as “-1 plus also some taunts and ad hominems” is just throwing gasoline on a fire.
 
Conversation ended Feb 3, 2016 at 21:24.