Conversation started Apr 27, 2011 at 17:17.
Apr 27, 2011 17:17
step length: 10.0±42.0 ...? (top-left LF-RH) that's quite some deviation to have -32 in there :/
I think that is one of those issues I was talking about :P
I don't know why, but for some reason that just happened to be the first one I looked at :)
I'll check the raw data to see where its going wrong
hehe, it does seem the only odd value
I have a feeling its actually correct :S
though its odd to have one outlier
[74.0, -15.0, -17.0, -10.0, 76.0, -16.0, -19.0]
yeah that's a bit odd indeed
[1L, 3L, 2L, 1L, 4L, 3L, 2L, 1L, 4L, 3L, 2L] + [1L, 4L, 3L, 2L, 4L, 3L, 2L, 4L] + [1L, 3L, 2L, 1L, 4L, 3L, 2L, 1L, 4L]
that's the patterns of the sideids in which the paws landed on the plate
so there are 2 1's before the first 4
so I should invalidate that one
crap I made it skip that first value, because else it started calculating the distance from 1 till the first 1 (itself!)
I could take that out and make it check that if the side == itself, that value needs to be 2
before crapping out
or rather, it should crap out as soon as it becomes 2
I also think I may have made a mistake or something in annotating the paws in the second measurement :S there's not 2nd LF
Hmmm it seems the insert of those contacts failed somewhere
For some reason, I doesn't update the measurementid, which is probably related to my 'solution' to the selection problem I mentioned earlier
hoeray for tracking down weird bugs :\
 
Conversation ended Apr 27, 2011 at 17:59.