« first day (18 days earlier)      last day (42 days later) » 

Ali
5:15 AM
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob So can you answer the question there , with evidences
 
 
1 hour later…
Ali
6:25 AM
0
Q: Was the Torah rewritten by Ezra as an attempt to to restore Judaism to what it had been before

AliI was reading this article which explains that Ezra rewrote the Torah in an attempt to restore the teachings of the original torah: Here is a relevant excerpt quoted from the article: The Torah had been lost; idolatry had taken over. The Jews had been exiled from their home as punishment...

 
 
8 hours later…
2:09 PM
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob
@ali adding barriers around the laws of the torah is different than adding new laws to the torah. Women wearing girdles are a minhagim, dipping I'm Mikwah is also — MoriDoweedhYaAgob 13 mins ago
really?
now why do you say that?
(I'm talking about the last point)
 
 
1 hour later…
Ali
3:26 PM
@Daniel can you explain what is the answer to the above question as I did not expect this question to belittle judaism
And I cant understand what is wrong with the question
 
3:40 PM
@Ali The biggest problem is that you don't really ask a question
You say you want "the truth"
but the truth about what?
There is a big block of text that makes a large number of claims
You need to be specific about what you are asking about
The article that you quoted says a bunch of things that are true
and uncontroversial among jews
But is written in a way that seems to have misled you
The fact that Ezra wrote the Torah using Assyrian letters does not mean that he changed the content of it
and the fact that he introduced fences around the laws does not mean that he invented totally new laws
 
Ali
O I saw this now
I guess the article clearly gives states he did add new laws to judaism not just changing the letters,
need to go now
 
@Ali We have explained the differences between decrees and Torah laws to you many times
Ezra did not create any Torah laws
 
Ali
4:16 PM
@Daniel Ya I understand that , the said decrees are I guess analogous to the Islamic fatwa which is different from Quran and Hadith
 
@Ali Exactly
 
Ali
The distinction is that we dont consider fatwas as Quran hadith , whereas the rabbis saying are considered to be torah
(Rabbinic))Torah=Torah+Talmud(sanhedrin+rambam+rashi+....)
 
@Ali Ok, but that is a much subtler difference than you seem to think it is
Either way, they are totally binding
And either way, the consequences for violating decrees are less severe than for violating the original law
Torah, in addition to it's meaning as the book of law, is also a word with a much broader meaning
Unlike Quran which (AFAIK) is only the specific book
 
Ali
Infact I also stumbled upon a tag in mi.yodeya where it literally said something like rabbi framing laws
 
The word "Torah" is sort of a word that means Jewish learning
@Ali Yes, the rabbis created laws. Those are "rabbinic laws"
They don't have the same authority as the written Torah
but we still follow them
The thing is that you don't seem to understand the distinction between rabbinic laws and Torah laws
Like separating meat and milk, as we have discussed in the past
 
Ali
4:26 PM
@Daniel I do understand framing decrees or judgements but laws?
 
That is a Torah law, not a rabbinic one
@Ali What don't you understand about it?
We give the rabbis the authority to create laws
Maybe you don't like it
But that's just how it is
That's Judaism
 
Ali
Thats just Rabbinic Judaism
 
@Ali Yes, that's what we follow today
 
Ali
Karaites , samaritans and many others have a different take on this and are aligned with the Islamic standpoint
 
@Ali So?
They don't really exist today
except in very small numbers
 
Ali
4:30 PM
@Daniel You gave the rabbis power to create laws , which is akin to adding laws
 
@Ali I didn't give them that power. The Torah gives them that power
 
@Ali - Are you trying to debate a foundation of rabbinic Judaism, then?
 
Ali
In Islam we have fatwas, they are based on Quran hadith they dont make new laws totally unrelated or to do "fencing"
 
Karaites and samaritans disagree with that interpretation
That's fine
They don't follow normative Judaism
 
That's a fine thing to do, but mi.yodeya is the wrong forum for debating it
 
4:31 PM
@Ali Ok. We don't follow Islam, though. Our rules are different
 
Ali
But there is a prohibition to add new laws and some rabbis have done it under the garb of "fencing"
so the core law is being violated
 
@Ali That's your interpretation
Those rabbis know more about it than you do, though
Trust me, they know that you're not allowed to add to the Torah
There is no prohibition on making decrees and calling them decrees
 
Ali
@Daniel I find no problem in giving decrees\fatwas which are important
But they should be derived from the revelation book
 
@Ali Frankly, we don't care what you have a problem with and what you don't
You are making up rules of Judaism that don't exist
We don't follow Islam's rules about these things
We follow our own
 
Ali
So who makes up the rules?
 
4:38 PM
@Ali Nobody makes them up
They are found in the Torah
 
Ali
and who is authorized to make the rules
 
@Ali Which rules?
 
Ali
the one you are refereing to
rules of Judaism
 
@Ali The groundwork comes from the Written Torah
That's where we find the authority of the rabbis to make decrees
 
Ali
decrees is fine as I said its the fencing which violates the commandment to not add laws
 
4:41 PM
@Ali I say it doesn't violate that commandment
So there
you can't argue with me
because I didn't give a reason
That's the way you are arguing
 
 
2 hours later…
6:13 PM
@daniel Mikwoh is custom now a days. Also the decree for a Baal Keri to not recite torah or anything like that by 3zra is a "fatwa" in his time as seen in the gamoro which says it was his time. Mikwoh is not needed to Daven just minhag
 
@MoriDoweedhYaAgob You are talking about men, then?
 
Ok
Then I agree
I was confused becaues the part of the paragraph that I thought you were referencing said that Mikveh for women was added by Ezra
 
@ali jewish fatwas of the talmud are based on torah n scripture. These fatwas can not be changed without Sanhadreen. Some fatwas are not for today's times but are still kept because of no Sanhadreen. These fatwas don't change or add to the torah back then and they don't change or add anything to the torah now. It is just fatwas which are helping keep the sharia of the torah be properly done. For example we have sharia to recite sham3 at night and day.
Fatwa was made to recite it in first quarter or night as to not forget to recite it because you will be tired and will go to sleep without saying it. Sharia is to say it anytime in th night. So if you have missed the fatwa time to are liable only to punishment on rabbinic grounds because you are not breaking sharia. And we as Jews as stringent to keep fatwas of rabbis because they only help keep torah and not desecrate it astagfurallah.
@daniel no problem, I want to join that blog and confront that jewish Muslim girl. She seems the same like that yamani jew who converted to islam in RaMbaMs time and tried to twist jewish writing n law in order to have sufficient evidence for his conversion to islam although he and certainly this girl has lack of common knowledge of judaism.
Only back then the Yamani Jews were uneducated and were in distress because they were being forced to convert that is why they asked helped from RaMbaM. In today's times no one(I hope) is dumb enough to listen to false claims like his and hers.
InshaAllah I will get in contact with her
 

« first day (18 days earlier)      last day (42 days later) »