« first day (392 days earlier)      last day (4053 days later) » 

7:18 AM
@Gilles Ah, something new every day. Good call about the the comment.
@Patrick87 I see, too bad. Would have happened to me as well; I often comment after closing. Will have to be careful.
How was this question reopened, with one vote in favor and one against? Did one of you, @Gilles and @Patrick87, take action? If so, where could I see that?
 
8:23 AM
@Raphael in the question history. When you look at /review, you only see actions taken from /review
 
 
2 hours later…
10:29 AM
@Gilles Doh. Thanks for replacing my brain; wonder when I'll finally know my way around the system. -.-
 
 
1 hour later…
avi
11:56 AM
Hi all here. I have created a cheat sheat of basic searching and sorting algorithms. Wiki has a such cheat sheet, but it does not have no. of comparisons & no. of swaps a sort algorithm requires in worst/ best case. I have included them. Shall I post this in CS.SE ? Is that allowed ?
 
 
1 hour later…
avi
1:13 PM
okay, I created the topic here :cs.stackexchange.com/questions/10991/…
please let me know if I have made any mistakes
 
2:10 PM
@avi Hmmm. I don't know whether it is meaningful to collect knowledge Wikipedia-style. Why not improve Wikipedia instead?
Nevertheless, nice. You should, however, phrase it as Question-Answer-pair so that more can be added.
I think that such a post could become a useful reference, in particular if more precise and average case results are added. The only concern is whether SE is a good place for "dumb" loop-up knowledge. Opinions?
 
avi
2:36 PM
I agree :)
I will add more average cases also
But how to make it more Q&A style ?
 
@avi Have to think on this. "What are time and space complexities of canonical algorithms?" would encourage additions, but would also be way, way too broad. Maybe restricting to sorting algorithms is enough? I don't really know.
The problem is also: How should one decide whether to upvote, assuming the facts are true? There is creative work in collecting (and referencing!) the results, and the question is not suited for examples or somesuch.
It's pure knowledge transfer; that's my concern. The other reference questions we have explain things (i.e. promote understanding) and/or display techniques (i.e. promote skill). This one does not. :/
I might not be explaining this well.
 
avi
I totally agree, now I understand... I will leave the decision to you... But however please let me know if there are any mistakes
 
@avi When I have time to check everything, I definitely will.
 
avi
Sure... Thank you !
 
 
7 hours later…
10:17 PM
-1
Q: Algorithms with polynomial time complexity of higher order

DeepuI was learning about algorithms with polynomial time complexity. I found the following algorithms interesting. Linear Search - with time complexity $O(n)$ Matrix Addition - with time complexity $O(n^2)$ Matrix Multiplication - with time complexity $O(n^3)$ Is there any algorithm with a highe...

this is really calling for a list of items
is there a way to answer this question (with an answer, not with an item)?
I wish others voted to close sometimes
 

« first day (392 days earlier)      last day (4053 days later) »