I am really annoyed with this question, he is not clear about his setup, I have done every other question without listening, minus one other he was not clear on, and this one is annoying me a lot, after listening no love.
and of course, after all of that, I did my math wrong, .4*.4 is not .24, no matter how much you want it to be
What I 'hate' most is that I need to actually calculate stuff :P
And I take screenshot notes in Evernote, but I often have to time correctly to try and get shots without hands on it and make sure they didn't move the screen
on this question he did not ask the question clearly and the page we answer on does not have the numbers you need for calculating the answer, you have to back up to find out.
During AI-class they had a ton of ambiguous questions and their reasoning was that it forced you to think it through and it didn't matter if you picked the wrong thing, as long as you tried
I think the risk of writing a wrong equation once is never ever worth it, write it correctly and clarify you are ignoring a term to do a relative magnitude comparison since the base is the same(which is the case here)
@IvoFlipse just cancer in general, this is an example problem I argue with every professor about as oversimplification, they dont take into account the P(disease|doctor ordered the test)
P(coinflip is heads|given last flip was heads) should be P(coinflip is heads) in a fair flip, that implies there is no correlation between events.
@IvoFlipse Ha, yes, we have that issue with my job, doctors wont send patients to our clinic because they make more money letting them do the procedure in hours.
First it means that person doesn't mind if its more expensive, because the insurance company will pay anyway. There's no pavlov reaction that changes behavior when prices increase
Sure you'll bark when your insurance gets more expensive, but that's something you decide once a year, you don't know what you'll need next year and you have no clue how much your health the past year actually cost
And second, because you don't directly pay for it, you often don't care about quality as much as you should. So if the care wasn't as good as it could be or simply doesn't solve the problem as they promised, we don't call them out
@IvoFlipse I do, I feel there you always want the BEST because it costs the same so your sort for the showiest option.
@IvoFlipse We had a student project want to do something for a hospital and they found that it was worth making it cost 1000 dollars as comparedto 10 dollars if it made it look really cool.
because hospitals want stuff that looks cutting edge and expensive.
I'm mostly involved with people selling orthopedic shoes and orthotics, I find it disgraceful that they will sell you an orthotic when they know it won't help or sell a more expensive pair of shoes for their own profit. But what can I do about it
@Kortuk Hehe, make sure it looks like a scifi movie
On a brighter note he is asking a few questions that if you have done a lot of statistics and found your intuition for it you can do without having to do math, I dont thing on purpose.
@IvoFlipse No one does when they start. At least you recognize it. My last class the professor made a major point of saying you do not have intuition for this until you learn it, until I teach you axiomatic statistics your intuition will lead you wrong, do the math until you know the answer and the math always matches your intuition .
I find statistics unbelievably interesting, I found estimation theory to be one of the most interesting things I have ever done, just as I found DSP to be very very fun.
darn can't find a link to the article I'm looking for
Those are statistical comparisons between the everted and inverted footprints compared to a 'normal' one.
The top row uses a segmentation where it basically assigns one value to an entire anatomical region (average, max or whatever) whereas the bottom row compares each individual pixel. As you can see the inverted footprint has a significant increase in pressure when using the top method, whereas there are more pixels with a significant decrease when you look at the pixel level