linux-hu37:/.snapshots/1/snapshot/lib64 # ./ld-2.14.1.so ../bin/chmod
../bin/chmod: error while loading shared libraries: libc.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
@OliverSalzburg Yes, and that post you had to correct would be good to further improve the automatic corrector. So, gonna see how far it already goes and in the future reference to it when I decide to work further on it (when I'm in one of those "review all the low quality" stuff sprees).
@OliverSalzburg: For links it leaves http:// ones unmodified, but he didn't use that so it interpreted them as sentences. Could probably use something that prepends www. with http:// if there's a second dot...
@DanielBeck It's getting deep into btrfs subvolumes, etc. I wonder if making cp executable and manually copying everything back would work as a stop-gap measure :P
linux-hu37:/.snapshots/1/snapshot/lib64 # ./ld-2.14.1.so ../bin/ls -l /bin/ls
-rwxrwxrwx 1 0 0 110176 Jun 8 16:14 /bin/ls
linux-hu37:/.snapshots/1/snapshot/lib64 # ls
bash: /bin/ls: No such file or directory
As we said yesterday, using a tool like LastPass may seem like overkill, but remember: The only secure password is the one you can't remember. You're better safe than sorry.
-1 "v10H73nqMQPkbUvTLOPyKBg4KnkUjWgF" this is not a great password, it's an awful one, since you simply cannot remember it. — LohorisMar 2 at 22:48
Recently, we've had some suggested edit spam from anonymous users. The specific question being targeted is protected:
protected by studiohack♦ Apr 27 '11 at 1:10
This question is protected to prevent "thanks!", "me too!", or spam answers by new users. To answer it, you must have earned a...
I was always furious when there is a length maximum, until I implemented bcrypt in one of our applications and realized that it only uses a fixed amount of characters and it makes no sense to use very long passwords.
@TomWijsman Heh, there was this publically visible database query page with a password textbox with a max length of 5 chars. Of course, they could have been preventing anyone from accessing it without scrrewing with the HTML.
@OliverSalzburg Installation is clicking the .user.js file and then clicking on raw. Local installaction can be done with Notepad++ > Run menu for easy testing.
@OliverSalzburg Fork the repo, create a new branch for features, do your edits, commit to your new branch, do a pull request from that new branch.
@DanielBeck Could be that that code already was there from GE's version. But yeah, could also be that I added some to that; but they're not guessed at.
@DanielBeck Because I'm used to typing ..., if people agree on … then we could switch that around. But I believe the majority just types ... so it might bother them changing it like that. Or are you talking about using … as SUPERSPECIALDOTFIX?
Also, this is a very early version I was slowly working on. But it might benefit more people if we work on it together.
Just one warning: Do check the differences, don't blindly trust them.
@TomWijsman It took me a while to realize that I could use Chrome to navigate to any file on my hard drive and install it as a user script. It's just too simple :P
If you're too bored for branching, you could just use the master branch. Although that might make individual merges a bit less handy if multiple people commit a lot.
@Bob You're really questioning me? :D
It doesn't replace whoo or ping, it replaces whooooooooooooooping.
"fishfish is currently in open beta, and is stable enough for everyday use. I use it exclusively on all my systems. The most recent version is Beta r2, released June 5, 2012."
Took me 5 seconds to reproducibly segfault it after the initial launch.
@TomWijsman But I don't think I fully understand the regex in RemoveSpacesBeforeInterpunction() yet :)
@avirk I think the user is asking because of wrong assumptions. He's talking about the software being installed on the other system as well. We must assume he thinks that because the other system has a Realtek driver control center thing as well. Thus, he identifies that it has the same software.
Of course, it isn't the same software at all. It could be largely different versions.
So it is not at all surprising that there are differences in the names of the binaries.
It may be the equivalent software, but not the same.
Ok, how are we going to get this working with code blocks?
I'm thinking of running 1 pass over the whole body, replacing all code blocks with short markers. Then run the whole cleanup pass (it will even be faster, because the body is now shorter :D). Then add the code blocks back in.
Recently, we've had some suggested edit spam from anonymous users. The specific question being targeted is protected:
protected by studiohack♦ Apr 27 '11 at 1:10
This question is protected to prevent "thanks!", "me too!", or spam answers by new users. To answer it, you must have earned a...
