« first day (1800 days earlier)      last day (2609 days later) » 

2:52 PM
How old does a q have to be for a non-mod to be able to protect it?
 
@ChristopherEstep I think it's only 24 hours? it's not very old iirc
I think workplace has (or had?) a reduced timeframe
 
3:19 PM
@enderland yes they made an Obvious Rule Patch for us and some "smaller" sites. 15k+ users can protect such questions immediately (I think)
 
Question for the community: I've noticed there is very good use of the chat here in workplace.SE. That isn't the case will all sites, even those with similar sizes and traffic.
Is this mostly mod-driven (moving lots of comment threads), is it simply the way the community developed?
Do you think it has to do with giving USERS the ability to move threads to chat? (Just got that prompt the other day, I hadn't seen that on other SE sites, is that unique to workplace.SE? Or is it a system-wide feature?)
 
@BradC I nearly never go into another chat room from the "moved comments to chat" thing
 
@enderland meaning what, you just hang out here in the water cooler? Or you only go into chat when your own comment threads are moved?
 
@BradC well as a moderator I often move comments :) I mean I never go into those threads to read them
 
3:37 PM
@enderland Ah, makes sense. You just toss those threads off into their own new buckets and let them live or die on their own.
 
People like to chat/discuss/argue, which is what chat is for -- not comments
so yeah
 
3:50 PM
@BradC By good use of chat, do you mean comments get moved to chat too often, or that the chatroom is very active and the discussion is more lively?
 
@MaskedMan I think they get moved "often enough", I guess. I'm sure there are some users who think its too much and others think its too few, but that can't be helped.
But once the threads are here, they seem well used, as well. On some other SE sites the chat is where comment threads go to die,
Also still curious about the user-available "would you like to move this thread to chat" feature. I've only seen this on workplace.SE, but maybe its based on user rep or something. I don't see that prompt on skeptics.SE, for example.
 
@BradC I think you have to go back/forth a few times
 
@enderland Hmm, the "mystery meat" of comment-to-chat promotion.
 
4:13 PM
@BradC They will flourish or expire depending on fate!
 
4:28 PM
@BradC Comments threads are not moved "here" though, that is what I was talking about. The Water Cooler is where we come voluntarily to chat.
@BradC you get that on other sites too, once the comment thread goes beyond a certain length, the next user who is about to comment gets that prompt.
By the way, looking at some of the recent HNQ, I think Politics.SE and Skeptics.SE should get together and spinoff DonaldTrump.SE. :P
 
4:43 PM
@MaskedMan Yep, plenty of Trump-related content in the past year, much of which can be contentious
 
-16
Q: I despise "The Workplace" thanks to the admins who move comments to chat

JonHI really despise the workplace due to the amount of comments moved to chat even when the comments are on topic. This of all the SE sites is probably the most notorious for moving very relevant comments to the chat. I had some comments on this question: Fired because your skills are too far abo...

 
Ha! Looks like not everyone appreciates it, then.
 
@gnat old news. your point?
 
2 mins ago, by BradC
Ha! Looks like not everyone appreciates it, then.
(myself I am among those who much appreciate this)
 
me too. comments are intended to have limited purpose and limited duration
 
5:02 PM
Moderator load can be greatly reduced by rate limiting comments which encourages self-moderation. 1. A user can make only one comment per post. The OP can be given some leeway to be able to respond to multiple commenters. 2. Total comments across the site are restricted per user, say to a generous upper limit of 1000.
This automatically cuts down the back and forth discussion between users on a third party's post, because it is not really a discussion if you have to keep deleting your previous comment to post the next one.
Users would also use their comments judiciously because if they keep commenting everywhere, the would eventually have to go back to that many posts clean it up so as to continue commenting elsewhere.
 
5:20 PM
I am totally ok with the idea that comments won't stick around forever, and that they can ultimately be moved to chat, but strongly disagree with those ideas, @MaskedMan. So I can point out a problem with an answer, and he can respond, but I can't rebut, without editing (if within limit) or deleting the old? Seems artificial and frustrating.
I know comments aren't for extended back and forth, but if they can't be used for any back-and-forth, then that radically reduces their practical usefulness
 
@BradC I agree, sometimes it does need 2 or 3 messages each way to properly clarify and fix the problem with a Q or A
 
6:05 PM
5
Q: I smell an elaborate troll

Mark HendersonI refer you to Hans Moleman's exceptionally exciting life! Jan 17: Gets fired by an intoxicated boss, but just went back to work anyway to find out he has a new manager Jan 26: Wasted a lot of time at work making an inappropriate video about themselves as a "joke" for their new manag...

2
 
 
2 hours later…
8:18 PM
9
Q: Should anything be done about a user posting fake questions

IDrinkandIKnowThingsI believe we have a user posting questions based on the plots of soap operas that are not broadcast in the US or Europe. Several of the questions have been popular though not really believable. Is there anything we can/should do? Is this a green light for me to post questions as though I were ...

 
 
2 hours later…
10:08 PM
0
Q: The paperclips are on the wrong side

Jason CThe site theme appears to put the content area on a stack of paper with paperclips on it. However, the paper clips are on the top right: Assuming a left-to-right language (the site is in English), unless we are looking at the back of the stack of paper, the paperclips are on the wrong (or, at...

 
 
1 hour later…
11:25 PM
posted on March 16, 2017 by Mister Positive

There is a user who has asked a RASH of rather ridiculous work scenario questions. The first one, I just took as bad luck, but the last two make me think they are asking the questions just for reputation points. Are these types of activities monitored? Do we even care?

 

« first day (1800 days earlier)      last day (2609 days later) »