Hello, quick question for you all: In following the standard format for a cover letter, I have my address and details then the date then I would like to put the details of the company I am applying to along with the details of the specific person I am sending my letter to. Then, I start the actual content. I am not sure how to address the person I am sending the letter to. I have figured out that they are a 3rd party HR resource being utilized by the company I am applying for.
So it seems incorrect to have their name in association with the company's details since they arent actual part of that company. Should I have their name, and then saying "In association with..." then give the company's details?
I am applying to a job directly from a company's website. I hit "apply" and then i get taken to outlook to email PersonsName@Company. Having googled the person's name, I see that they are working for an HR company and not directly for the company I am applying to.
I have an intern at work right now - I'll name him Kyle - who seems uninterested in the field. He's been here for almost 9 months now.
I had provided Kyle some cheatsheets for work, and taught him a few things. However, in the next week. Kyle comes in like a "blank slate", as if he's starting f...
I'm surprised how much of an issue the publishing of work-party photos on the local intranet is... I'm normally pretty privacy minded, but this seems to be a bit too much. They're coworkers and you're at a company party... if things are going on that you really don't want your coworkers (who are there) to have pictures of, you should rethink your actions, not complain about your privacy :/
@Erik My issue is absolutely not with the content of the photos. Simply the fact that, based on what was in the question, the OP took an executive decision that they did not have the authority to make. HR pushed back and told him it was unprofessional. He disagreed, I disagreed with his disagreement.
If you get given files for a specific purpose, that is not an invitation to start making decisions about who else should have access to them.
I agree that it was a bad choice to do it without consulting HR, but "unprofessional" is pushing it to me. I'd rather have colleagues who are willing to make decisions over ones who need instructions for everything.
But then I always have issues with hierarchical models and authority anyway, so it's probably just my personal attitude :)
@Erik I disagree completely. In order to do my work, I'm trusted with access to files, documents and internal information that is not public information, even if some of it can be derived from public information. The over-riding rule is always to ask permission before sharing something I've been trusted with access to.
And sure, publicly-taken photos are probably harmless. But the principle is the same. If they're not your files, you don't get to decide where, how, and to whom they're distributed.
And evidently his HR agrees, else they wouldn't have had them taken down while explaining that it's unprofessional.
@Erik and @Kaz - in the UK this would also be taken very seriously. Our HR regs are rather stringent (even if I wasn't in Financial Services, which is even more sensitive to this)
@Lilienthal Obviously, it will be one of you two - and that will be a good result for the site
But it's nice to have others nominate, and see what is required. SOme have done that and not succeeded in a first election, but been reassured by the voting and gone on to be elected in later ones
I have a lookup relation, so I need to filter Parents (id, Name) whose last created Child has status__c Failure.
Tried something like:
SELECT Id, Name
FROM Parent
WHERE RecordType.Name = 'rt'
AND Id IN (
SELECT Parent__c
FROM Child__c
WHERE Status__c = 'Failure'
/*ORDER BY CreatedDate ...
I really hate to write a negative review about a site and I will preface what I say by acknowledging there's a lot of great people on this board with valuable information on the workplace. However, I absolutely must protest the culture and attitude a lot of Users portray.
I'd like to begin by te...
@RoryAlsop Why was it not adding anything? It was the only useful comment on the question. There is no question in the so-called question, so that was the only comment which asked the OP to actually ask a question.
@RoryAlsop If it was useful on the question, why was it moved to the chatroom? We tell tall stories about using comments to improve the post, and that comment was trying to seek clarification from the author, so what was the problem there?
Just to be clear on this, the OP has not clarified what his actual question is, so that comment is not obsolete either.
Hey - I don't see it as a problem. One of the things that happens when moving comments to chat is that it's difficult to move only a selection. It moves all or none unless you put in a lot of extra effort. I'm not a mod here and I didn't delete it, so I'm unsure as to why it was deleted. I just mentioned I didn't see it had value
It was deleted by a moderator from EL&U, I wonder what business they have here.
@RoryAlsop That is a lot like saying it is difficult to punish only criminals, so let us put everyone in jail. "It is too difficult to do" is not an acceptable excuse. Either do it properly or don't do it at all.
@MaskedMan no. Mods volunteer their time and have vast amounts of things to do, that are rightly flagged up by the community. One of the things that makes life a wee bit easier is that when comment chains get too long, mods (or the author of the comments) get an option to move them to chat. Not pick and choose. Mov them all to chat.
If we had to go through every single comment discussion (which I'll remind you are designed to be temporary and should all eventually be deleted!) we'd get nothing done
We hear over and over and over and over again that StackExchange is not a forum, it is a Q&A site. At the slightest sniff of a discussion blooming, moderators chase comments with torches and pitchforks into chatrooms. However, it appears that the community subscribes to the philosophy of "what go...
@RoryAlsop Now look, nobody is forced to be a moderator, so "I am doing this voluntarily, so I can do whatever I want, and you cannot question me" is not acceptable.
I am interviewing at different companies and the resources the companies put into this hiring-process vary a lot. For example
At Company A I was "only" interviewed for 45 minutes by one manager until now
Company B has interviewed me twice (and now asked for a third interview) where multiple peo...
@MaskedMan alternatively - you have made up something that you think I have said, and I'm saying you are entirely wrong.
@MaskedMan if you read back what I wrote, what happened is: a comment chain got too long, and got moved to chat. Either by a mod or one of the commenters.
Then someone deleted your comment - possibly as it hasn't any value in its location
You can flag a question as "unclear what you are asking" and that would be more useful, I think, than being a bit inflammatory in chat with me when I'm just trying to help give a view of what may have happened
Just answer these questions: 1. Did the post have an actual answerable question? 2. Did my comment ask the OP to clarify his actual question? 3. Did I use the comment feature in a manner it is supposed to be used? 4. Did the OP actually clarify the question? 5. Was my comment moved to chat by a moderator?
A useful way to approach things is to not be personally invested in stuff you write on Stack Exchange. Remember once posted, it is actually community property, and can be edited by a wide range of people, or deleted
@MaskedMan No - I'm not going to, as you are being deliberately inflammatory and rude. Some of those I have already answered (as best I can - and I have explained where I don't know)
@MaskedMan I'm not sure what you are on about now, but yes, you are being rude to me. I am not in a position to do much of that stuff any more than you
@enderland I said as much. I wouldn't have deleted it
it's nothing to do with me though - I have been trying to help this dude out with info as far as I can
@MaskedMan do you think I am someone I am not, for some reason?
@enderland If you go through my comments here, you would notice that I am not even addressing @RoryAlsop. That is not just a coincidence, I was trying to have a discussion on how things turned out this way rather than "why did you do it this way", but apparently, he took it as a personal attack, which I cannot help with.
@RoryAlsop That's unfortunately how the chat room works. As there are multiple threads of discussion running, I was trying to reply to a particular thread, but the UX doesn't make it clear until you roll your mouse over it or something like that.
In other words, if I flag the comment saying it shouldn't have been "moved" to chat, it means it should be moved back to where it came from, not deleted entirely.
the mod who deleted it (since chat flags are fubared all mods see all chat flags) has no way to know that and in this case no way to be able to do that
Since the site allows upvoting of Comments, why doesn't it allow downvoting as well? It seems only natural.
I understand the whole point that "comments aren't designed to be permanent". That's a great theory, but in practice most comments remain in place forever.
And I understand the whole poin...
@ChristopherEstep I "stalk" his profile from time to time. I look up to him as a mentor (without his knowledge, of course). I guess that holds for a lot of us. :) This is especially since my current manager ... uhm, let me just say, doesn't do many mentorish things.
I particularly like how he makes sarcastic remarks in a "gentle" way. I remember someone posting a question asking why companies insist on a degree because he was so smart without it anyway! Then Joe's reply was something like, "That is a very interesting idea. You should start a company where you hire only people without degrees. Then all the smart people will want to only work for you."
Whenever I make a wisecrack or a joke and my wife (usually) or someone else would say that it's not really that funny I'd say "You have to accept that when I'm cracking a joke, I'm doing it for my own amusement rather than anyone else's. I'm never disappointed."
@ChristopherEstep my favourite validation is when I catch the kids making the same jokes I would, and their friends laugh. I know they wouldn't laugh if I said them, but I'm funny by proxy...
I'm not regular user on this Q&A, but I decided it can't hurt if I just leave this thought of mine here.
What is this about is that I've seen several repetitive questions, most of which I've seen thanks to the Hot panel, which involved over-thinking and over-escalating really petty conflicts. I'...
@RichardU What do you do when you aren't funny, not good looking, entirely untalented sides' from math and find any form of social interaction draining?
You become a software dev because in that profession you can get by with all these flaws
@Magisch actually, what I did was act in a few plays and do standup to overcome social anxiety, learned how to joke, started caring about my appearance, picked up a copy of "How to win friends and influence people" and a few other books
@Magisch my philosophy is that when you're dealt a bad hand, deal yourself a new one.