6:46 AM
In mathematics, an extreme point of a convex set S in a real vector space is a point in S which does not lie in any open line segment joining two points of S. Intuitively, an extreme point is a "vertex" of S.
The Krein–Milman theorem states that if S is convex and compact in a locally convex space, then S is the closed convex hull of its extreme points: In particular, such a set has extreme points.
The Krein–Milman theorem is stated for locally convex topological vector spaces. The next theorems are stated for Banach spaces with the Radon–Nikodym property:
A theorem of Joram Lindenstrauss states...
I have so far usually encountered extreme points in contexts of functional analysis (locally convex topological vector spaces and Krein-Milman theorem). They are probably useful in other areas, too.
However, they are closely related to convex sets. Does it seem reasonable to use convex-analysis tag ifor the questions where I would use extreme-points, if such tag existed? In particular, questions that are specifically about extreme points?
1 hour later…
7:54 AM
Among the newly created tags is see metric-topology, currently with 7 questions. All of them seem to be about topology induced by a metric. I'd say that the tags metric-space and general-topology are sufficient to cover this, so this new tag can be safely removed.
8:40 AM
Another tags among new tags for which I doubt whether they will be useful are nonnegativity and global-nonnegativity.
1
If I have a quartic form that I can write as $$P(x,y)=(x^2/2,y^2/2,xy)M(x^2/2,y^2/2,xy)$$ where $M$ a a $n \times n$ symmetric matrix, what is the simplest way to derive whether the form is positive definite? For quadratic forms this is quite easy, you just need to check the eigenvalues of $M...
5 hours later…
2:02 PM
1 hour later…
3:13 PM
Rodrigo de Azevedo: I have noticed that you have created several new tags. For example the tags for bijective, injective and surjective functions, which have been recently removed. In general, unless you are fairly sure that the tag is going to be useful, you should probably discuss creation of a tag first on meta, there is a thread dedicated for this purpose. If a new tag is discussed on meta first, it is less likely that it will be removed later (which means that the effort — Martin Sleziak 2 mins ago
of the tag creator was in vain). Some users even think that almost every new tag should be discussed on meta. Some additional advice related to creating tags can be found here. Having said that, I should also say that I appreciate your effort to help with correct tagging of questions. It is also good that you create also tag-info - many users creating new tags neglect this. — Martin Sleziak 47 secs ago
Sorry for pinging you on a post unrelated to this issue - but I needed to find a place to ping you. Feel free to ping me in chat after you see these comments - so that I know that I can remove them. — Martin Sleziak 29 secs ago
BTW when these tags were discussed, I left you a comment with a link to the meta post. Did the comment reach you?
2 hours later…
5:49 PM
0
Problem: I feel that there are quite a number of questions tagged with both general-topology AND algebraic-topology where the former is not really fitting. My understanding being that General Topology in common usage does not mean "Topology in general" so all of Topology, and neither should the ...
2 hours later…
7:57 PM
@Rodrigo: When creating a new tag you need to weigh a few things. For example the scope of the tag and how likely it is to be misused. Since uniqueness is not a notion unique to to PDE, this means that the scope of the tag is going to be extremely ill-defined, and thus very open to misuse if you do think about it as a tag for ODE/PDE related questions. So either this is too broad of a tag, or it is too open for misuse. In any case, I'd be happier if you had laid off the new tags for a while and instead joined into the meta discussion about tagging to get the feel for when to add new tags. — Asaf Karagila 5 hours ago
@Rodrigo: Yes, one can search for more than one tag. One can use more than one tag. Nevertheless, everything I wrote about the uniqueness tag is relevant. And if you were to join the discussion about the usage of tags on meta, you'll learn what are the directives that the people who have invested a lot of time and effort into the current tagging "philosophy" follow. Whether you agree or disagree with them, if you want to actively help the tagging effort, you should at least respect them and see what the fuss is all about on the meta site. — Asaf Karagila 25 mins ago
8:13 PM
I've implemeted this suggestion and removed undergraduate-research from all questions. But it still has a "tag info" blurb. Does that mean it is still available to use for under-1000 rep users?
@6005 Tag-removal script runs once a day. So unless somebody will use the tag in the next 24 hours, it will be completely removed. More details can be found here: meta.math.stackexchange.com/questions/1200/…
1 hour later…
9:25 PM
in Math Mods' Office, 3 hours ago, by Martin Sleziak
This is related to tags, but it needs assistance from mods. I am not sure whether the synonym quartic-equations $\to$ polynomials would be reasonable. But a synonym in the opposite direction, i.e. with (quartic-equations) as the master tag, must have been made by mistake.
in Math Mods' Office, 3 hours ago, by Jyrki Lahtonen
I downvoted that synonym suggestion. Seems to be buried for now.
« first day (1503 days earlier) ← previous day next day → last day (2855 days later) »