« first day (2025 days earlier)      last day (2905 days later) » 

3:00 PM
They don't have to provide explanations, or give you any chance to say anything
 
vzn
cmon 0celo7 you gotta take some )( responsibility my man, you sound like my sig other when shes mad at me, which was nearly all wk, maybe not finished yet :( o_O
 
For?
 
vzn
@0celo7 for you, a zen question to answer
 
That's bullshit
 
vzn
choose your battles wisely
 
3:02 PM
Either state what you mean clearly or don't say it at all
God you can be annoying
 
@0celo7 That you'd have a fun time
 
vzn
lol, yeah, maybe soon you will hate me as much as the mods also :( o_O
 
1 message moved to Trash
 
@Danu I didn't have a fun time because I left
I had a fun time after I left
 
That's what I meant
 
3:04 PM
Why would you expect that
 
vzn
@0celo7 seems like a subtle distinction :|
 
Because changing stuff up is nice
Getting out of your old habits/patterns can be refreshing
 
vzn
what he said
 
I doubt that was the reason
 
vzn
@0celo7 what do you think of that eminem + rihanna song?
 
3:11 PM
Love the Way You Lie?
 
That was the last album by Eminem I still listened to---it was pretty disappointing overall :\
 
Not a fan.
 
I used to love his music
 
vzn
@0celo7 there are ~2, that is 1, there was another newer one
 
@Danu Figures.
 
3:12 PM
@0celo7 Yeah? :D
How so?
 
@Danu As a kid, when I lived in Germany, he was the shit.
I imagine it was similar in Dutchland.
@vzn The Monster?
 
Hmm, I don't know actually. I wasn't super in touch with pop culture until I turned like 14 or something
 
@Danu And I was 10 then.
So yeah.
 
:P
 
I think Em went down since The Eminem Show
 
vzn
3:15 PM
@0celo7 monster inside of my head, seen lyrics or video?
 
@vzn I just listened to it
 
vzn
@0celo7 he had a meltdown on a talk show once
 
He's a drug addict
 
@0celo7 @0celo7 Agreed
 
vzn
@0celo7 yep. self admitted. hopefully over it but who knows. anyway thats really not uncommon in that biz. (riri seems to like her ganja etc)
 
3:16 PM
The two before it were the best
Hi @Qmechanic
 
Hi @Danu
 
@vzn I'm more of a southern rap person
 
vzn
@0celo7 em/ his addiction reminds me of an old nietzche quote. his riri song seems to evoke it.
 
@Qmechanic How are you doing?
@QMechanic I'd love to know what kind of stuff you work on/read some papers by you. Would you consider sending me some by email, if I promise not to reveal you identity (I'm assuming you want that)?
 
@Danu : Good. What's up?
 
vzn
3:19 PM
> Beware that, when fighting monsters, you yourself do not become a monster... for when you gaze long into the abyss. The abyss gazes also into you. —Nietzche
 
@vzn Sounds like a non-sequitur to me ;)
 
@Danu did you listen to Drake's new album
 
vzn
@Danu it was a zen-sequitur :P
 
@0celo7 I find Drake very annoying, unfortunately.
 
@Danu His voice?
 
3:22 PM
@0celo7 Voice, topics he sings/raps about
 
vzn
drake is big at moment )(
 
I don't listen to a ton of rap anymore these days, in general. And when I do, it's always the older stuff (golden era 90's stuff, mostly Wu Tang or ATCQ)
 
vzn
drake also collaborated with riri a few times =D
 
@Qmechanic ...other than that, I'm doing pretty well. Very tired but satisfied from playing a few hours of tennis earlier today.
 
@Danu Jay Z, Nas?
 
3:24 PM
This semester, I've finally found time/partners to play with and it's great.
 
vzn
@Danu rap has gotten very mainstream & into a lot of pop songs, male/ female duet/ tradeoff, its very instyle for several years
 
@0celo7 Sometimes; Blueprint has some good stuff and Nas is generally pretty cool, but I don't find myself seeking their music out...
 
vzn
how about table tennis? :)
 
It's okay. A bit too repetitive for me, though. My father used to be one of the best (on a national level, that is), and I played with him for a few years when I was younger.
But tennis was always my favorite sport.
@Qmechanic I'm taking that as a no; Maybe you could still say what kind of topics you generally work on?
 
vzn
guessing... QM? :)
 
3:28 PM
Don't think so; I'm expecting QFT-related.
 
Chris Brown & Lil' Wayne? Yikes...
 
@Danu Do you like Big Sean?
 
That video clip, too. Sigh
The lyrics are very unimpressive, so far. Are you trolling?
 
@Danu How dare you accuse me of that
 
3:33 PM
OK, got it.
 
Chris Brown is actually a good rapper
Sadly he always does his singing schtick
@Danu I don't think anything made by DJ Khaled has significant lyrics.
But them beats tho
 
Very bad, IMO.
 
Huh?
 
I much prefer the music in ATCQ songs.
 
Example?
I'm assuming it's generic 90s rap beats
 
3:35 PM
This is amazing
It's not just the beat, either
 
Generic 90s beats confirmed :P
You don't like trunk music/trap?
 
So anyway
Without going to reps
 
@0celo7 For weird beats, I guess you should go Wu Tang
 
What's the difference between $O$ and $SO$?
 
3:39 PM
How do you express $\text{det}(g) = 1$ without a rep
 
@Slereah Component connected to identity
 
Determinant is basis-independent.
 
Well it works in any rep but you still need one, tho
 
Also $SO(n)$ is a matrix Lie group*.
 
I like @0celo7's answer better :p
 
3:39 PM
It's defined by the (fundamental) representation
 
Makes sense I suppose
 
EWW that video is censored
that's some dumb shit
What do you think about that beat, @0celo7?
 
I find censorship way more offensive than any swear really
 
Agreed
 
That shrill BEEP is some awful shit
 
3:41 PM
It's an insult to the artist
 
Oh I don't even mean on principle
Just
The sound they use
 
@Danu very low quality
 
I guess that, as far as modern rap goes, Kanye West's Twisted blahblah album is pretty good
 
lemme get an HQ version of the track
TO ITUNES
 
3:42 PM
@0celo7 Pfft
Oh, you mean the sound quality?
 
yes.
Apple Music to the rescue
That would not vibrate my car enough :P
It's catchy though
 
You don't already know this stuff?!
 
I have it downloaded actually
Not enough time to listen to it
 
This is such an awesome way to start one's first album.
Also epic beat
All Wu Tang stuff is pretty special
(especially the first album)
 
Epic beat?
Maybe for east coast rap
You have to go to the dirty south for good beats
 
3:47 PM
Let's agree to disagree
 
Apparently this is the solution for the Thirring model
 
hello everyone !
 
GLORIOUS SOVIET THIRRING MODEL
 
@Danu : Sorry. I prefer it that way. :)
 
3:55 PM
can i discuss a question here ?
 
sure
Well, unless it's against the rules I suppose
Is it gonna be a rude question
You can't ask why the mods of PSE smell
 
no a physics ques..
 
Then it's fine
 
I am confused about the zero potential of the earth .
 
what about it
 
3:57 PM
how and y is it defined to be 0 ?
can i provide a link to the orig que i posted on PSE
 
I need $40
 
Electric potential is not an absolute thing
It is only defined up to a gauge
 
Well i know that..
but please take a look at this
1
Q: The Zero Electric Potential of the "Earth"

Robin HoodI know its the potential differences that matter and generally we define the zero of the electric potential according to our convenience .I would like you to look at this standard problem :- Charge "-Q" is given to the inner (conducting) shell and the larger outer(conducting) shell is earthed ...

 
That is, if you have an electric potential for your system $V(x)$ and $V(x) + c$, those describe the same systems
 
yes i agree and understand that..
 
3:59 PM
Well I'm not sure what you are asking about then
You can define the potential such that the potential of the earth is 0
(That is assuming of course that every point of the ground has the same potential, but that's a good enough approximation)
 
yup considering the earth a large large conductor
 
well no need to really
It's just a mathematical trick
No physical assumptions about the earth are really made
 
plz elaborate..
 
Well like you said in your question
You could just put the earth at any constant potential $V_0$
And you would get the same observables in the end
 
i understand that .. but then i am unable to solve the problem without considering the earth to be at 0 potential
 
4:03 PM
This is just because the "real" field is the electric field, and $\vec E = \vec \nabla V(x)$
So any constant will just go away
Well what equation do you have to solve here?
 
i am unable to understand what loss of physical information occurs when i assign it a potential V .
 
Just assume the earth is at a potential $V_0$, and let's see what we can do with the equation
 
have you seen the problem about the shells in my question ?
 
Yes, but I'm too lazy to work it out
 
hmm..
well just let me know whenever you find a solution for it .
 
4:29 PM
I flagged this as spam on the basis that the questioner is the same purpose who wrote the linked page:
-2
Q: Is lift possible without aerodynamics?

Vineet KiranCan this design create a lift? http://contest.techbriefs.com/2016/entries/aerospace-and-defense/6513-0505-022058-magnetic-flying-machine

 
5:00 PM
I'm writing a little thing about all the 2D physics I know
One thing I like about it
I don't have to wonder if $\phi$ is a scalar field or a coordinate
No polar coordinate!
 
@Slereah what?
 
Well it's 1+1D
Spacelike section is just a line
No need to bother about angles
I wonder what potentials for scalar fields give nice solvable Lax pairs in 1+1
 
5:24 PM
@Slereah but what if you Wick Rotate
 
5:34 PM
how about don't
IIRC in 2D Euclidian gravity and Lorentzian gravity are the same
which is neat
Though they are trivial theories
Well, not quite
Depends on the spacetime volume or whatever
 
6:01 PM
Hm wait
I think I have an idea
To prove that spacetime isn't dynamic in 1+1D
Split the atlas $R^2$ into compact pieces, like $\forall n, m \in Z,\ [n,n+1] \times [m,m+1]$
The image they have is also compact and their intersection has 0 measure
so that $$\int_M d^2x R = \sum_{n,m} \int_{[n,n+1] \times [m,m+1]} R$$
And then $$\sum_{n,m} \chi_{nm}$$, with a variation of 0 obviously
Does that sound alright
 
what is $R^2$
 
It's more of a proof of a sketch since I'm pretty sure I should take into account overlap of atlases and whatnot
$\Bbb R^2$
 
Are you sure that noncompact 2D spacetime isn't dynamic
What the fuck does that even mean
 
That $$\frac{\delta S_H[g(x)]}{\delta g} = 0$$
 
what
the action principle?
 
6:10 PM
Errr
$\forall g$, that is
There is no constraints on the metric to obey the action principle
(If we only use the Hilbert action)
 
oh
are you sure this is true?
 
Well, it is certainly claimed in every paper about it
And it is very close to the Gauss Bonnet theorem
 
How is $S_H$ defined?
 
But the Gauss Bonnet theorem is only for compact manifolds
 
@Slereah implying physicists know what they're talking about
First off we need to decide what $S_H$ means
 
6:12 PM
$$S_H = \int_{\mathcal M} d^2 x \ \sqrt{-g} R$$
 
@Slereah That's not well-defined for noncompact manifolds
 
Why not
 
Because $R$ need not be integrable on $\mathcal M$?
 
Or
IS IT
I do recall that there IS a non-compact version of the Gauss Bonnet theorem
 
You could have something like $S_H=\int_{\mathbb{R}^2}x^2y^2$
@Slereah Yeah there is
I don't remember it
 
6:14 PM
That basically says $S_h < $ some bound
So it does not diverge
Though maybe for Lorentzian manifolds, I dunno
 
Hmm, perhaps.
Proof?
 
In differential geometry, Cohn-Vossen's inequality, named after Stephan Cohn-Vossen, relates the integral of Gaussian curvature of a non-compact surface to the Euler characteristic. It is akin to the Gauss–Bonnet theorem for a compact surface. A divergent path within a Riemannian manifold is a smooth curve in the manifold that is not contained within any compact subset of the manifold. A complete manifold is one in which every divergent path has infinite length with respect to the Riemannian metric on the manifold. Cohn-Vossen's inequality states that in every complete Riemannian 2-manifold S with...
this one
Not sure if you can apply it willy nilly to Lorentzian manifolds
But Gauss Bonnet does generalize to it, so I'm going to say that it FEELS right
Physics is all about feelings
 
I haven't done any math or physics in like a month
 
Well maybe you should have come on this chat
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
 
Some ***** decided to ban me
 
6:18 PM
Hm, wait
What I said doesn't work too well
Because if I cover the manifold with a grid of compact squares
Then the Gauss Bonnet theorem isn't $\int R \approx \chi$
I need to take into account the boundaries and corners
 
Yep
I have a feeling this isn't true
But that integral is wrong anyway
It's not defined
 
yeah
 
Or is it
 
Well
I'm gonna go say
 
I need to investigate
 
6:22 PM
The integral is gonna be defined
Because of that theorem whatever
And I'm pretty sure that the spacetime isn't dynamic, either
But proving it sounds thorny
Hm, what would be Gauss Bonnet for a square
 
Look in Lee
 
Apparently the boundary term is the exterior angle, for a polygon
BUT
Importantly
It would be a constant
 
@DanielSank Are you around?
 
@Slereah but how do you know that your decomposition works for all manifolds
 
Well I am assuming
 
6:32 PM
Or do you fix the topology first
I'm confused by this
I need some bourbon
 
1) if the intersection in $\Bbb R^2$ is of 0 measure, then it is also of 0 measure in the manifold
2) The overlap of atlases doesn't fuck this up
3) the integral boundary of the squares do not depend on the metric (it's ~ the exterior angles)
 
Proof?
 
Gut feeling, mostly
 
@Slereah How are the angles determined
 
I think it's just like
$$\theta = \frac{g(X,Y)}{g(X,X) g(Y,Y)}$$
 
6:37 PM
you mean $\cos\theta$?
 
w/e
ALTHO
What if one of those is a null vector
I mean if I use a square along timelike and spacelike coordinates that's probably fine, tho
 
@BernardMeurer yes
 
@DanielSank I saw this today and thought of you, check it out, I thought it was a pretty cool idea
 
@BernardMeurer I've heard of that.
Neat.
 
Right? I quite like it, maybe will try cooking again with that when I'm in the US :p
Saves me from the adventure going to a market is
 
6:46 PM
@BernardMeurer eh?
 
@DanielSank I don't like going to the super market
 
@BernardMeurer why?
 
@DanielSank Because he lives in Brazil.
 
hue
 
@DanielSank A couple of reasons:
1. I end up buying useless crap because I get distracted
2. I don't like everyone seeing what I'm buying, idk, it bothers me
3. There are too many options of everything. I take a long, long time
 
6:57 PM
@BernardMeurer Gotta develop a plan. When I go to the grocery store I have a route in mind so I can grab my food and gtfo.
Which reminds me... I'm really hungry.
 
@DanielSank So am I
And yeah that's what I do too, but it requires you to know your supermarket.
 
@BernardMeurer What should we eat?
 
@DanielSank I have some chicken with mustard and honey in the fridge
And some mango
 
@BernardMeurer I like mango, but I need something more protein oriented.
And I ate chicken yesterday.
I think I will procure some cheese, bread, and perhaps some form of vegetable.
I have a picture for you...
 
::drumrolls::
I have grown to like mustard more and more recently, I really love it now
 
7:04 PM
@BernardMeurer figuring out google photos permissions again
 
@DanielSank Did we figure it out last time? Or did you just email me the permalink?
 
@BernardMeurer I'm just really annoyed that I can't set it so that specific people can view.
It's either all or nothing.
 
@DanielSank Yeah that's kind of dumb compared to what GDrive offers, but I couldn't figure it out either
 
@BernardMeurer It's a bottle of beer...
 
@DanielSank I'm not a good photographer :p
 
7:09 PM
@BernardMeurer Mailed you a link.
Some more food for you to be jealous of :)
 
Holy fuck what is that Dan?!
It looks so good
 
It's pizza. You've probably heard of it.
 
Há ha ha, I mean why does it look so special :p
 
@BernardMeurer Oh, because it's done right.
My friend bought a komado joe.
It's a ceramic grill. You can get it up to 530 C.
 
What's that? Looks like a barbecue grill and a pressure cooker had a baby
 
7:14 PM
530 Coulombs? :O
 
We cooked the pizzas at 400 C.
@Slereah Very funny.
 
Thank you, I'll be here all night
Take my wife, please!
 
You can make excellent pizza even without a super hot grill though.
@Slereah :)
 
@DanielSank :O Why do you make me so hungry :p
 
@BernardMeurer 'cuz you're attracted to me, obviously.
There are a few simple guidelines for great pizza:
 
7:15 PM
@DanielSank Hahahaha
 
1. Ingredients are bread, tomatoes, mozzarella, basil, olive oil.
2. Make sure the tomatoes have been drained of water.
3. Cook reasonably hot on some form of ceramic.
That's it.
 
How do you drain tomatoes?
 
The biggest mistakes people make are putting too much stuff in the sauce, and not draining the tomatoes well.
 
I drain my tomatoes every day
 
@BernardMeurer just use a strainer. I didn't have one this time so I just squeezed them in my hand and let the water drain away.
 
7:17 PM
@DanielSank If I manage to get to UCSB all your food are belong to me
 
@BernardMeurer The best thing is to cook the tomatoes in a pan. This drives out the water but retains the flavor of all the goodies in the liquid.
@BernardMeurer Only if you become my apprentice.
 
@DanielSank I'll be your apprentice in physics and food :p
 
@BernardMeurer Excellent.
@Slereah ?
 
It is an innuendo
 
My phone battery is pranking me
it dies when it reaches 30%
@DanielSank Is grapefruit good?
 
7:34 PM
in the gyroradius calculation, what is v when the velocity is not on an axis?
 
@BernardMeurer Yes.
 
user54412
@dmckee Ha! He even posts his rejection letter from a crackpot journal for not being up to their standards.
 
@ChrisWhite Heya
 
user54412
hi
 
7:53 PM
@BernardMeurer Sure.
 
@DanielSank Did you eat after all?
 

« first day (2025 days earlier)      last day (2905 days later) »