« first day (872 days earlier)      last day (2954 days later) » 

9:17 PM
sd f
 
ahh I see you here now... was checking in SOCVR first : )
 
Blargh, that's right I'm not privileged here :D
 
sd f
 
@Undo yet another PR in, when you're free.
 
sd f
Okay, I give up on that regex experiment.
!!/pull
 
9:35 PM
@undo I like to be privileged in Charcoal HQ (since answers has been removed from SOCVR), let me know if my report history is ok for you.
 
[ SmokeDetector ] SmokeDetector started at rev e27fdb4 (Normal Human: Insiste on empty path, again) (running on Raspberry Pi)
Restart: API quota is 9646.
 
@PetterFriberg Yeah, just a sec.
 
Take also a look at @Tunaki
 
both of them pending CI
 
ok thanks...
 
9:39 PM
why wait for CI when you know it didn't break anything :P
 
@Seth 'cause Flake might yell at me and Smokey won't let me pull until CI finishes.
!!/pull
 
dammit flake
 
[ SmokeDetector ] SmokeDetector started at rev 438fc64 (Undo1: +Tunaki to CHQ list) (running on Raspberry Pi)
Restart: API quota is 9627.
 
That contains you too, @Petter
 
wait, does Ask Ubuntu really have the 2nd most reports? o_O
 
9:41 PM
yes
AU gets lots of spam.
 
@Seth switch to all time
 
Yeah I see the revision, thanks, I will take care as I did in SOCVR.
 
@Undo aha!
Didn't see that switch.
 
also, @ArtOfCode why are you running two Circle containers? o.O
 
That makes me feel a little bit better. Only 4th all time.
 
9:42 PM
@PetterFriberg I'm looking at your feedback history right now, and it's shining, so I have no doubt you will :)
@Undo Am I?
 
There should be a place somewhere to change it.
 
@Undo Is erwaysoftware running on rails?
 
@Seth theoretically, although I don't think I brought the main site back up yet
yeah, right now it's just running the Apache thing, apparently.
 
So.. I'm confused. I'm looking at the "posts" view, but I can't make out what the little red Xs and green checks differentiate. I see Xs on true positives and checks on true positives..
 
@Undo 'kay, done. Don't know what I've done, but it's on 1 now.
 
9:46 PM
yay, should make things saner later :P
 
@Seth Red X is an fp report from someone, somewhere. Green check is a tp.
 
@Seth there are a lot more red x's than usual today.
 
@ArtOfCode okay, so the spam fp I'm looking at must be an accident.
 
@Seth link?
 
9:47 PM
fixed
 
granted it's not the most obvious spam.
 
I fp'd that :P
 
I know ;P
 
IIRC because the user has legit looking content other places
... or had
 
I laughed when I saw it was you
 
9:48 PM
Yes, eltima spammers play a deep game.
But there's a reason the link is blacklisted ;)
 
Now it's you, just from review instead.
 
@Seth I didn't know they'd gotten that evil :/
 
yeah..
 
deploying metasmoke
 
actually huh, looks like it isn't blacklisted, just a keyword.
 
9:49 PM
I mean, is the ROI on doing that actually there for the spammers?
deployed @ArtOfCode
 
cheers
Hey, that stat should actually be useful in taking a quick look at someone's accuracy.
Hah, @Undo you and I have the same invalidation rate
Who's account 5 on MS?
 
I think that's 404
or Marshmallow
grr
@ArtOfCode oh, that's you
 
@Undo Really? Your review stats (chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/28769401#28769401) and my feedback history (metasmoke.erwaysoftware.com/admin/…) don't agree
 
wait, I was reading it wrong. You're 7, @ArtOfCode
Yeah, 404/Normal/Marshmallow is 5
 
That makes more sense :)
 
9:57 PM
[ 5] #<User:0x00000003d15dc8> {
                        :id => 7,
^ optimized for confusion
 
/whatever that name is these days
Hah, nice output.
 
@Seth Same thing though, www.eltima.com still matches as a keyword.
 
right
hence no PR ;)
 
10:13 PM
[ SmokeDetector ] Phone number detected in body, phone number detected in title: Quicken +18556924630 phone number by Amelia Mia on askubuntu.com
 
@Undo hate to say it, but the conflicted search is broken again... non-conflicted posts showing up
@SmokeDetector k
 
@ArtOfCode Kinda thought it would be, but you weren't saying anything so I thought it might be okay
When we switched to invalidating things, it stopped busting the cache on the post
 
@Undo First time I've looked at it since... whatever it was
 
Glanced over that yesterday and thought "that can't work", but was busy with other things.
 
Ack, it's annoying when a change breaks things you didn't even know would be affected.
As long as it can be re-fixed, I'm happy.
 
10:17 PM
@PetterFriberg I just published version 16.4.1 which has this feature. Based on URL parameters: add ?alert=stackoverflow to chatroom URL to only receive alerts from there.
At least, this is how it's supposed to work.
"I don't do UI" is one of my principles when it comes to software...
 
sd k
 
sd k
 
@Marshmallow Thanks, I will try it tomorrow and let you know (time to sleep now : )
 
Should we blacklist pornhub.com specifically (data) or more generally sites with "porn" in the domain?
i think the latter is safe to do. Checked SO, found a couple of questions with pornel.net, but that domain now redirects elsewhere, so new such are unlikely. Otherwise, url:porn picks it up in the path part of the URL, which wouldn't trigger.
 
10:32 PM
So... no legitimate usage?
 
@Marshmallow For 3 hits? It's probably not worth it.
The more general filter might work better.
 
@hichris123 None that I saw. And I can guess why pornel.net was renamed: regex based blocks
Okay, the general filter it is.
@hichris123 Unless you count this OT question, where I'm not clicking that link.
 
The close button is always clickable though. :P
 
sd k
Hm, should we reconsider total exclusion of answers from SOCVR? Few characters and offensive is something that's not that controversial.
 
10:43 PM
@ArtOfCode Yeah, this is what testing is theoretically for
@Marshmallow Maybe, although part of me says we should just stick with total exclusion for a few days before we touch it
 
I agree with that part.
 
10:56 PM
!!/pull
 
[ SmokeDetector ] SmokeDetector started at rev 41f2780 (Normal Human: porn in domain name) (running on Raspberry Pi)
Restart: API quota is 9265.
 
11:22 PM
@ArtOfCode fixed
 
Neat, cheers
 
11:44 PM
[ SmokeDetector ] Mostly non-Latin body, mostly non-Latin title: asterisk - Вызов скрипта, при поднятии трубки by user2039467 on stackoverflow.com
 
@SmokeDetector ignore-
 
Shouldn't that be an F?
 
I think this is the middle category, like NAA. Not spam, but not appropriate either.
Does N work for questions?
 
It didn't the other day...
sd n
 
@BrockAdams [:28848031] That report was a question; questions cannot be marked as NAAs.
 
11:48 PM
Alright, then it's F. But...
 
@SmokeDetector f
 

« first day (872 days earlier)      last day (2954 days later) »