« first day (2006 days earlier)      last day (2987 days later) » 

4:00 PM
prepend is fine
lol, had it at document_start not document_end
 
4:17 PM
I'm playing with removing the frame
need to wait for some feeds to happen though
 
hmmm. to write a paper and try to present at a conference or not... :o
 
do it do it do it
 
@enderland writing? Sounds like work. Try Scotch instead
NOOO!!!! I just clicked a button on accident and it changed my visual studio settings because it popped over top of my current window. Life as we know it has just ended, my visual studio settings are now randomly different and the world will surely implode
stealing focus from one window to another should be a felony.
 
going back to holoheadsetthingie for a moment
> Like the early VR headsets, this will appeal to technology enthusiasts with large amounts of disposable income.
 
should've put your visual studio settings in version control
 
4:28 PM
read: this is useless and extremely expensive
 
@Ixrec ...
 
@PreferenceBean VR never appealed to those people
 
@Ampt (I was not being serious)
@enderland it didn't? I've heard good things about VR from sources which meet that description
 
@Ixrec that should be the new "(removed)"
 
user41796
@Ixrec I'd argue it's not that bad of an idea. Especially when your preferred settings don't align with the default
 
4:29 PM
@Ixrec VR has always been an overpriced toy
 
@GlenH7 except now every dev gets YOUR preferred settings
 
> rev 23451: changed all spaces to tabs
 
yeah, putting .whateverrc files in version control is hardly unheard of
 
now they can use whatever settings they like
 
I assume VS settings aren't quite so idempotent though
 
4:30 PM
because tab indentation is the best thing ever
@Ixrec impotent perhaps
 
@Ixrec if I could I would.. I do with emacs but the visual studio settings don't just save to one file. It all saves all over and who knows where
 
user41796
@Ampt And now we have a more consistent coding style...
 
@GlenH7 unless you are a shortcut junkie in which case no one will code anything more. though I guess that is still "consistent" ;)
 
@JimmyHoffa I bet you're "not allowed" to use half of the VS features, too, amirite
ic
 
this is why some applications allow tiers of settings files, one for the repo and per-user overrides
 
4:31 PM
@GlenH7 heh, because forcing everyone to use the same exact window layout leads to more code consistency. Talk about a leap of faith.
 
I think our linters do that
that sort of thing scares me though
 
user41796
@Ampt No, I was referring more to the Tools -> Options type of settings. That's stored in a separate file
 
@GlenH7 you know what causes a more consistent coding style? Make everyone write Haskell in Spacemacs. Done.
 
user41796
You were just trying to find a way to work in a reference to spacemacs today
 
@GlenH7 mod abuse!
 
4:33 PM
also I think it's amusing I see more mod closes here from Oded than the actual site moderators
 
user41796
Thomas closes quite a few as well
 
Speaking of mods, I wonder how @WorldEngineer is doing lately?
 
haven't seen him since he threatened to ban me
 
I'm sure he wasn't without his reasons, too.
 
user41796
@PreferenceBean Likely meant suspend, not ban. Yes, there is a difference
 
4:36 PM
@Ampt considering he came into a conversation out of the blue to say nothing but that, it felt more than a little ironic
@GlenH7 w/e
 
user41796
@PreferenceBean He generally just lurks when the conversation is rolling by
 
ok so check this out
 
like shog. but I think shog has a direct port on his brain for all SE content
 
getting there
hah, coming back to that image in its own tab was very confusing
 
seeing someone elses messages highlighted in blue is confusing...
 
4:39 PM
finding yourself having daily conversations with a sock is confusing
 
hey, don't look at me, I'm just a figment of @GlenH7's imagination.
 
that makes much more sense then
 
user41796
@Ampt No, no. Today you belong to @MichaelT.
 
Ugh, I wish you guys would tell me the custody schedule in advance.
 
user41796
Pshaw, yeah whatever. As if we'd give you that sense of autonomy....
 
user15026
4:42 PM
@Ampt He's still alive, if that helps. :)
 
I was hoping you guys would remove my sense of smell one of these updates... I'll take that over autonomy!
 
@Ampt s/autonomy/anatomy/
both things a sock lacks
 
@GlenH7 or an anatomy
 
@PreferenceBean don't know what you did there, my bookmarklet works perfectly well.
 
damn too late
 
4:44 PM
Or an anatomy!
 
27 mins ago, by PreferenceBean
I'm playing with removing the frame
@Ampt ^_^
 
oh I see it. That frame. Yeah, just change the css on it.
can the drop shadow, blank the background, delete the "new feed items" text if you want..
 
@JimmyHoffa I hid the whole thing. Or so I'd thought. Come to think of it, SE is obviously re-showing it lol duh
also need to hook in somehow to line-limit the RHS, though I like how it looks now
(the idea being that the container can just go entirely - only the list itself need be in the sidebar)
 
@PreferenceBean the container is attached to the "dismiss" button though, as well as I would guess the event that adds items to the list to begin with
 
@JimmyHoffa apparently not
per my screenshot
 
4:54 PM
oh, that stuff is getting added after being moved over?
 
user55340
@enderland that git/docker question, the OP is going to have problems some day if the core competencies of the company are being developed by external (untrusted) developers.
 
@MichaelT details, details... :P
 
that's the sort of question I quickly lose interest in, because I just don't understand the mindset that thinks the source code all by itself is the valuable part of the business
 
user55340
4:56 PM
4
Q: What Does It Mean For An Idea To Be Protectable

Brad RhoadsI just finished watching Mark Cuban 4 Parts of an Ideal Investment Pitch. Mark [Cuban] is looking for four things: The company’s core competency, why you’re great, how the idea is protectable and how it can scale. What does it mean for an idea to be protectable?

 
user55340
@Ixrec it's not a code or workflow issue... It's a business plan and organization problem.
 
yes
 
5:19 PM
gimme feeeeedz
the one time I want to see them....
 
you're the one screwing with a perfectly good solution :P
 
I think I've got it
and it's much better ;)
will share when data comes in & I can verify end-to-end
 
@PreferenceBean you've interleaved them with the items in the starboard and given them random numbers of stars each, amirite?
 
@PreferenceBean just got items in the feed. If you see nothing, you are b0rk.
 
5:30 PM
automatically styles each item and limits them to 5 max
I think the most recent. Too early to be sure :P
the line spacing is a bit wacky still but otherwise I'm happy with it
 
@PreferenceBean no dismiss button
 
@JimmyHoffa no need for one
the entire purpose of this exercise is to remove the need to dismiss anything
you can't dismiss stars
 
it removes them when over 5 show up?
@PreferenceBean can too.
 
@JimmyHoffa wot
@JimmyHoffa yeah
keeps only up to 5 most recent in view
 
@PreferenceBean you see that "I Pledge allegiance" star of yours on the starboard?
 
5:31 PM
nooooo
 
Say uncle
 
MOD ABUSE MOD ABUSE!!!
 
user55340
@JimmyHoffa for mod!
 
oh god
errors
huh wait something weird.... that might be a general underlying chat thing
three HTTP 409s on messages/new in my log
ahhhhh it's the "you're typing too fast" mechanism. ok
 
5:36 PM
(Changed max to 3 after adding some spacing)
@JimmyHoffa ok
 
173wpm?
dafuq?
 
lol it made me take an anti-cheating test because I'm so fast
had to do it again for some semi-captcha'd text
could only just reproduce my speed. lucky.
 
@PreferenceBean yeah, it makes you do that if you're over 100
 
@JimmyHoffa :D
what did you get? I was too busy being tested
 
I typically hit 110-120
 
5:39 PM
loser
:D
> Current online records of sprint speeds on short text selections are 290 wpm, achieved by Guilherme Sandrini, on typingzone.com, and 256 wpm (a record caught on video), achieved by Sean Wrona, on TypeRacer. Wrona also maintained 174 wpm on a 50-minute test taken on hi-games.net.
jesus
 
I've never seen somebody hit 170, dick
 
:)
seriously, feeds looks beautiful now <3 <3
 
@PreferenceBean you don't have to .remove() stuff
 
@JimmyHoffa ynot
 
instead of a timer you could use css gt child count comparator to display:none I think
 
5:43 PM
that'd be a memory leak
note that the timer is just a sort of document.onload.onload and is only used to encapsulate the script
I spy Feeds changes using DOM hooks
but you're probably right - could CSS-only the item removal
 
div:nth-child(1) { display: block; }
div:nth-child(2) { display: block; }
div:nth-child(3) { display: block; }
div:nth-child(4) { display: block; }
div:nth-child(5) { display: block; }
^^ then have a blanket hidden for everything else
no need for the interval then
 
the interval has nothing to do with this
also that presumes that new items are prepended not appended (that may be true - I'm not sure yet)
the other thing is that I'd need to load that into a stylesheet - it can't be set from the userscript by any mechanism I'm aware of
 
@PreferenceBean can be
 
@JimmyHoffa howzat
Testing stuff like this is why I have socks... — Shog9 ♦ Feb 26 at 18:25
@Ampt proceed
 
$('html > head').append($('<style>.tick-item:nth-child(1) { display: block; }</style>'));
 
5:49 PM
ew
dude
(pfft fine ;p)
$('#ticker-items div:gt(' + (MAX_TICKER_ITEMS + 1) + ')').remove(); is still nicer
in the mutation observer
 
keeps the dom cleaner
 
heh I wonder if there are horrible recursion problems with my approach
@JimmyHoffa surely removing invisible and unneeded DOM elements is what keeps the DOM cleaner
 
@PreferenceBean to?
 
@Ampt I dunno, make a joke or something
 
@PreferenceBean yes; that's what I'm saying
 
5:51 PM
you don't have to
@JimmyHoffa ok
 
gee, thanks. Now I feel obligated
 
:D
all part of the sockvice
What's wrong with this picture?
 
I can't work like this. I'm so tired and confused about what I'm doing all the time.
 
@KitZ.Fox :(
 
@KitZ.Fox have you tried heavy drinking?
 
5:55 PM
Yeah trust me it helps
Until you start shaking so much you can't carry the tea into the room, that is
 
I think my liver stopped working.
 
@KitZ.Fox You should get a new one delivered
 
It will grow back eventually.
 
user55340
@PreferenceBean Amazon likely has one.
 
@KitZ.Fox bigger and better than ever!
yesterday, by Jimmy Hoffa
@PreferenceBean worth noting: Persistent alcohol consumption over time causes the liver to actually swell and grow, to the point of making a visible expression to the outside.
 
5:56 PM
[rats]
Something to look forward to.
 
Yes, that's part of cirrhosis, innit?
 
@KitZ.Fox So what's up?
 
That and the nice yellow color.
@PreferenceBean I have yet another head cold. I can't seem to track work in an agile fashion. I feel like I'm constantly chasing my tail.
 
can you be more specific
 
@KitZ.Fox then agile is working. Honestly, this seems to be precisely the way in which Agile is meant to function if empirical evidence is any indicator
 
5:59 PM
Um no
 
is there a good workflow for making pull requests that depend on other pull requests in git? I feel like there should be...
 
@enderland the answer is "quit your job"
 
@enderland Pull requests are not a git feature, but a common workflow on top of ordinary merges. So if PR2 depends on PR1, we actually have three branches b2 for PR2, b1 for PR1, and master for the target branch. If PR2 expects that PR1 has been accepted before it is merged, we can encode that in git by merging b1 into b2.
 
@enderland I mean use SVN
 
6:10 PM
@PreferenceBean I can't get ahead of anything. I'm always reacting and never planning or never executing a plan anyway.
 
@KitZ.Fox what sort of plans do you think you should be making?
 
@PreferenceBean What we are doing next. How things are going to get done.
 
@KitZ.Fox What sort of things?
 
@amon yeah, github does that well too - I guess I could do a PR against my branch maybe? that seems silly though hah
 
@KitZ.Fox What you do next is defined by the backlog, no? Doesn't sound like there's much to plan. That's a good thing!
 
6:13 PM
our project hasn't gotten big enough that it's easy to isolate PRs for different things, we're getting close but right now some of the functionality depends on other PRs
 
what's PR again
 
pull request
 
meh
you know what you need
an octopus merge!
 
@PreferenceBean Our requests are "redesign this page" and "move to a new data architecture" and "create a product catalog". When do I have time to break that down? I don't.
 
@KitZ.Fox If that is all the detail given to you, send it back for lacking in sufficient detail
You can plan how best to go about writing that email
If there is enough detail, it's time to get your team together to perform a task breakdown
 
6:15 PM
You don't seem to understand that I don't have time for any of that.
And neither does the team.
 
If you can't perform task breakdowns then you can't perform tasks so you can't be too busy to do task breakdowns because there would be no tasks underway!
What is going on that takes up so much time?
 
So basically we're going 90 mph until the work runs out.
I don't like it.
 
and until everybody burns out
take an hour or two out to do task breakdowns - what's preventing that?
 
Everyone is working on the current sprint.
 
but you allocated some time in this sprint for planning the next one, correct?
 
6:17 PM
... oops
 
Friday morning.
 
then you're doing the task breakdowns on Friday morning
what's the problem
 
@enderland What does depends-on mean? If the feature in branch2 needs the functionality of branch1 to work, they should already be merged. Remember, Git is distributed directed acyclic graphs all the way down. The commit graph should necessarily contain all dependencies. Or is the dependency more on an organizational level?
 
It takes more than 90 minutes to figure out how we plan to deliver a product catalog.
Etc.
 
then your first sprint retrospective will say "next time, we need to allocate more time for sprint planning because this was not sufficient". and you are all going to be a few hours under your targets this week because the meeting went on for longer than planned
it's agile. that's fine. shit happens
the important thing is not to panic about it because then you won't get anything done :)
 
6:19 PM
A product catalog is an enterprise-level venture that is much, much bigger than what we can do right now.
 
then push it back to management for being a pipe dream
 
A single planning session is not going to cover it ever.
 
then plan it over multiple sessions
 
We need a roadmap for that.
 
I give up - good luck
 
6:20 PM
No time for roadmaps.
 
@amon yeah. But now imagine that branch1 is based on master, but branch2 is further work on branch1 (or somehow requires functionality in branch1, at a basic level, maybe the API is consistent but it needs the functional changes) - it's interesting trying to figure a workflow out for how to do a PR for both at the same time
 
You're the scrum master. It's your job to make time. Tell people that something is infeasible. Tell people that they will set aside X hours for Y meeting. Don't take no for an answer. Complaining that you don't have time to do anything helps literally no-one, and panicking about it even less so.
 
technically you really shouldn't until branch1 gets approved, I guess
once a project is more mature it's a lot easier to avoid this because you can do meaningful branches exclusively from the master/trunk branch
 
@PreferenceBean No, I'm not. The dev lead is the scrum master.
 
What are you?
 
6:22 PM
Product owner.
 
besides a fox I mean
 
this is actually interesting enough for me I might write it out on the main site
 
Ok then it's definitely your job to push back on silly requests and get requirements scoped out
don't be afraid
 
It's not a silly request.
And I don't do requirements. I do "user stories".
 
you just said it's "much, much bigger than what we can do right now"
 
6:22 PM
Apparently. Now.
 
@KitZ.Fox user stories are requirements
 
User stories are placeholders to have discussions with the team about what business wants.
User stories are not requirements.
 
@enderland If the PR2 were accepted, the PR1 would also be implicitly complete because the commit hash of the b1-head (which is included in the b2 history) would be contained in master. I think GitHub would mark PR1 as closed automatically.
 
@amon I think so, too - but is the best bet to just keep updating which PR you are working on? if it's a stopper for you it's more complicated :-)
 
@enderland I'm not sure I follow, and at this point a main site question with necessary context and pretty ASCII-art branch diagrams might be a more convenient method of discourse.
 
6:28 PM
yeah... there are a few on SO but all of them relate to the mechanics and not the process
 
Kit couldn't stand the animation for this blog post announcement
 
6:49 PM
Why the animated gif? Why? Why??
 
Because burning death.
 
user41796
@KitZ.Fox Thank you. I was just about to do something similar
 
0
Q: Workflow and process when branches have dependencies in git for code reviews

enderlandA fairly common workflow for working with git is: Fork master Make changes/add functionality in branch Make pull request for your branch vs master Merge pull request (after code review, automated tests, whatever) It is also possible to run this in parallel to another fork - perhaps you are ad...

 
@KitZ.Fox @GlenH7 Clears throat
MOD ABUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU‌​UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE‌​EEEEEEE
 
user41796
@Ampt Huh?
 
6:59 PM
@GlenH7 kids these days...
 

« first day (2006 days earlier)      last day (2987 days later) »