Coding Projects and Duga Heaven :)

12:00 AM

RELOAD!

[retailcoder/Rubberduck] 1 commit. 120 additions. 13 deletions.

[rubberduck-vba/Rubberduck] 1 issue comment.

[skiwi2/OLog] 2 opened issues.

[Zomis/Brainduck] 1 issue comment.

[Zomis/Duga] 1 opened issue.

[Zomis/GdxPlayground] 1 commit. 2 additions. 7 deletions.

[Zomis/NeuralOne] 8 commits. 876 additions. 94 deletions.

SirPython

@Duga This got me interested in neural networks. They are pretty cool.

7 hours later…

StackExchange

7:26 AM

In ordering #5, self-driving cars will happily drive you around, but if you tell them to drive to a car dealership, they just lock the doors and politely ask how long humans take to starve to death.

2 hours later…

9:21 AM

[Zomis/Brainduck] Zomis commented on issue #27: SpecialCommand.toString returns empty string if appending code

> @skiwi2 If I remember correctly, the full text of 'GroovyCommand: ' + this.code is returned as empty.

1 hour later…

10:47 AM

hey

11:13 AM

@Mast Nope, just a description:

> A playground to play around with LibGDX, and with Map Generation

@SirPython Indeed they are. Especially when you actually get started with them. I still have a long way to go to actual image recognition though :)

11:42 AM

@Duga @SimonForsberg I don't even have the slightest clue how the full string can suddenly be empty... An interesting bug to fix nevertheless

12:10 PM

@skiwi I don't have the slightest clue either. That's why I created an issue for it and dropped it until later :)

don't know if the same thing will be reproduced for others.

maybe it's just something with my machine / IntelliJ

I'll have to see how hard it is to dig into your code, maybe I can find some time before I head to uni

12:49 PM

I'm a bit more confused @Simon, any reason you are using 'GroovyCommand: ' + this.code instead of "GroovyCommand: $this.code"

[Zomis/Brainduck] skiwi2 commented on issue #27: SpecialCommand.toString returns empty string if appending code

> To me this looks like your configuration has a caching issue, I get the following output when running Analyze on the by default provided BF code (only a part of the output is provided here):

> Code instructions per command
NONE: 3732
ADD: 270
WHILE: 39
NEXT: 100
PREVIOUS: 54
SUBTRACT: 76
END_WHILE: 39
GroovyCommand: lastLoop 'initialize100': 1
GroovyCommand: assert value == 100: 1
GroovyCommand: loop 'setupFizz': 1
GroovyCommand: loop 'setupBuzz': 1
GroovyCommand: nextLoop

[Zomis/Brainduck] skiwi2 commented on issue #27: SpecialCommand.toString returns empty string if appending code

> I am not entirely sure how your `Map<BrainfuckCommand, Integer>` approach is working though...

To me it looks like no hashcode and equals methods are provided in the `BrainfuckCommand` class, which makes them unsuitable to be used as keys in a `Map`.

1:25 PM

hey everyone!

@Duga I have a Map<BrainfuckCommand, Integer>? I have no memory of that. What am I using that for?

It doesn't make them unsuitable, @skiwi. The default Object hashCode and equals will be applied.

@Duga Huh, looks like it is working for you...

@skiwi I used to try "GroovyCommand: $this.code" as well but that didn't seem to work either. I figured it was because it was a GString and not a java.lang.String

1:55 PM

Hello

hey @Phrancis!

Hey, how are you!

A bit tired but good and you ?

2:24 PM

Pretty good

@SimonForsberg But how is that one suitable?

I'm assuming that if two BrainfuckCommands as GroovyBFContext.SpecialCommand have the same String code, that then they should be equal?

2 hours later…

4:24 PM

@skiwi I'm not sure. If you use the same Groovy code at different places in the code then I think they should be considered different Groovy Special Brainfuck commands.

and I can see some future usecases where I would want that, so I don't think I should have a hashCode and equals for it.

4:54 PM

Okay... That does make sense indeed

5:49 PM

@SimonForsberg Been able to confirm yet that the bug also disappeared on your end?

6:07 PM

busy with moderator stuff and was at work before

Yeah people like to battle on meta now it looks like....

StackExchange

6:22 PM

http://www.commitstrip.com/en/2015/12/07/no-reboot/
CommitStrip
No reboot
CommitStrip
1449512364

6:38 PM

Hmm, did a bomb go off in The 2nd?

Not interestedin joining in anyways :D

@skiwi kinda... it's back to normal now...

well almost. there's a load of mods from wherever in there now

Well, it's a good thing that they feel welcome to hang around ;)

Well a quick recap : discussion about if a question is too broad, some people take the discussion personals, things goes out of hand for a while and then everyone has calm down and talks about muffins the lion king and other stuffs

@Marc-Andre lol right

Nobody here playing OGame anymore? :(

bazola

6:56 PM

@skiwi sorry @skiwi, haven't had much time for that. how is your empire doing?

Doing pretty okay ^^ haven't been crashed recently

@skiwi I started a while ago in Ganimed...

@Vogel612 Still playing actively? And on .de or .org?

s113-de.[...].com

I got bored with OGame and also busy with real-life stuffs

7:02 PM

I'm mostly just checking twice a day to start the next thing in the queue and possibly spam some defenses or ships to get rid of excess resources

That's not too active then :P

no, really not.

2 hours later…

8:42 PM

The best way to win a game like OGame is to not play. Really.

Well, it's not about winning :P For me at least

Okay, let me put it another way:

As long as you are playing a game like OGame, you are losing.

@Duga @skiwi Where do I use Map<BrainfuckCommand, Integer> ???

[Zomis/Brainduck] Zomis pushed commit 6dc62008 to develop: Include code in toString for GroovyCommand, fixes #27

[Zomis/Brainduck] Zomis commented on issue #27: SpecialCommand.toString returns empty string if appending code

> Okay, now it seems to work. No idea what caused it.

The `CommandCountAnalysis` is meant to count how many times each command is performed, totally unrelated to this issue. `BrainfuckCommand` is an interface BTW, not a class. And this `SpecialCommand` should not have hashCode and equals as two commands that have the same code should not be considered the same command for the `CommandCountAnalysis`.

Nevermind, found it.

@Duga @skiwi added this also: Using Object.hashCode and Object.equals does not make them unsuitable for use in a map. It's more when you have mutable objects, and put one into the map and retrieve another that it's unsuitable, or when you want a different equals check.

[Zomis/Brainduck] build for commit 6dc62008 on develop: The Travis CI build passed

[Zomis/Brainduck] Zomis closed issue #27: SpecialCommand.toString returns empty string if appending code

8:59 PM

@SimonForsberg Right, I'm aware of that, I was thinking initially though that you awnted to stack commands that are the same together

I didn't realize at that point that you cared about their context

@skiwi Consider the case where you do $ assert value == 100 in one place in the code. That becomes a SpecialCommand, which is a BrainfuckCommand. Now you write $ assert value == 100 at another place in the code, inside a different loop. How should CommandCountAnalysis count them?

9:29 PM

@SimonForsberg Most likely as a different command then?

2 hours later…

SirPython

11:41 PM

Monking.