« first day (15 days earlier)      last day (79 days later) » 

3:20 AM
I'm thinking that rather than trying to make everyone happy, I'm seriously thinking about segregation: chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/21496898#21496898 Both sides can be happy in their own world
 
But it creates a seperation
within the commmunity
 
3:41 AM
@nhahtdh If segregation doesn't work in real life what makes you think it'll work here?
Again, I'm not for censoring all the pics. Just the highly sexually suggestive ones.
It's not like any of you are gonna die if they were to be removed anyways.
However, I will let @ʞɹɐzǝɹ do his research and stuff first. I wanna apologize for any rudeness previously and I do think it'd be best if you consult other mods and users first.
 
@Frosteeze you better make it up w/ some quality monster huntin'
 
But I has midterm tomorrow D:
 
4:02 AM
@Frosteeze My idea is a more tightly-knit sub-group within the community. I'm not sure what you are talking about regarding segregation in real life.
It's like all those language room on SO
 
@nhahtdh But why do we need sub groups within a community ?
All we need to do is tweak a few things and it'll be awesome for everyone.
 
4:33 AM
I still haven't accepted that this room should exist, so I'm not going to engage in extended discussions here; if you want to discuss with me, you can do it in the main room. But I figure since I'm one of the people involved in the bot's image collection, I'll at least comment on it.
My opinion on the matter is that, yes, the images probably do have a small effect of turning some new users away from chat, and that furthermore, this is a net *good* thing. It creates an atmosphere that is more familiar and comfortable for serious anime fans, while gently informing casual visitors "maybe this isn't the best place for you".
In fact, this sort of exclusionism is the basis on which Stack Exchange itself works so well (or in some cases fails to work). This video by Joel explains the basic principles in far more detail than I can here:
So if we lose a couple new users from the bot, that may still be a net positive thing in terms of the culture we are trying to create here. And if a new user really wants to participate but doesn't want to see the bot images, it's 2 clicks to ignore it (compared to thousands it took us to set it up), so I think we're already accomodating the vast majority of people.
I don't really have a problem if other people want to be allowed to inspect the images to look for NSFW ones before they're added (I've offered many times but no one has taken me up on this), or if we decide that more moderation features are needed for the bot (e.g. binning/editing NSFW images). And if other people want to add their own images, be they cute girls or anything else, I've offered to help before and that offer is still open.
On the other hand, I'd definitely have a problem if we decide the bot can't be allowed to post images any more (or if it's only allowed on command). I've put many dozens of hours into my part of this, gathering, sorting, and uploading images. I've attempted to incorporate every guideline I can to ensure the images are appropriate.
I've spent a lot more time on other aspects, such as making thumbnails to ensure that the bot isn't interfering with anyone's ability to use chat (and I'm not the only user who has worked on it a great deal).
At this point, I don't think it's exaggerating to say that the bot is the most important reason I'm still in chat, and I think that goes for at least a few other users.
I still get very vague complaints which can't explain why a particular image isn't appropriate fairly frequently; I've often asked for clarification about what made someone thing a given image is "sexualized" or "suggestive", but I've never gotten any useful feedback to refine my methods and (except in the few cases where I legitimately made a mistake) I still don't understand what the problem was.
If people can now provide me with more thorough explanations of what is causing the problems, I'm happy to listen.
But in most cases so far even other users in the room haven't understood the complaints being made, so I don't know how I can translate that level of imprecision into a method for sorting through thousands of images in a reasonable amount of time by hand. I'm quite sure that the images I've added recently would be classified as "safe" on all major image boards (danbooru, sankaku channel, e-shuushuu, konachan, yande.re, etc.) so I really have no what it is that people are complaining about.
Honestly, it feels very hypocritical, given that many of the regulars who have complained have also posted worse images in chat themselves.
It isn't as if this is a new thing; we were posting tons of (often more) images even in 2013 long before the bot existed; it was mostly a way to automate this activity. In fact, the collection of images the bot is now using started as a collection of things for me to upload in chat the same way the bot is now, and eventually got big enough that it was worth automating.
Finally, I'll say that I think the name of the room "Maid Cafe" and description have a much bigger effect on newcomers than the messages posted intermittently by a bot. The majority of new users won't even stick around long enough for the bot to be the reason they leave. The room name is already somewhat extreme and possibly off-putting to many non-anime fans, and the description is, for lack of a better term, incredibly weeaboo.
I don't think these are bad things; rather, they quite automatically separate the users who really want to be here from the users who really don't, in much the same way that the bot does.
To be honest, now that for whatever bizarre reason meta discussion doesn't belong in the main room, the bot is the main reason I've stuck around there. If that is also removed, I'm not sure I'll have any further reason to chat at all. But if accomodating a few new users is more important than that, feel free to go ahead and get rid of it the same way you got rid of meta discussions in the main room. Just keep in mind that no one is going to chat if there's no reason to chat, and more often than not, the bot is helping to create new discussions rather than quenching them (at least by my esti
 
@EroSɘnnin Let people be happy within their own group, otherwise, we have to tone down the single room we have
@LoganM The point of this room is to collect spontaneous meta discussion into one place, so that it's easier to search. I don't think it's not allowed in main room, just that the discussion will be lost after people start chatting something else
 
Hell of a rant, @LoganM. Not sure what triggered it, but I applaud the effort.
 
@Shog9 If someone is going to tear down something you put so much effort in, it's the least damaging thing you can do
 
4:52 AM
@Shog9 This was my first serious chance to rant in at least a couple months, so I went all-out.
 
@LoganM I kind of agree with this - let's keep the status quo for the room where people enjoy, and if you enjoy something else, create a room - like C or JS or Java rooms on SO
 
That would be fine by me.
 
@LoganM I agree that they are considered safe on those boards, but people from different culture may have lower level of tolerance - that's probably where the complaint comes from. Or maybe people access the site from work
 
@nhahtdh If something is important enough to be useful for the future, it shouldn't be buried in a chat room at all, whether the room is dedicated to meta stuff or not. It should be refined and posted on meta.
 
It's kinda a place where we can have an extended discussion
I agree that we should try to use meta more...
 
 
2 hours later…
7:05 AM
the intent was partially to alleviate potential comment threads that might occur and partially to gather thoughts
 
 
2 hours later…
8:47 AM
I was told there would be drama?
 
@Gemtastic what kind do you like?
I will try to accommodate
 
I heard the sexism was the current issue
 
I may have opened a can of worms in the chat :P
 
@Gemtastic sexism is assumed but never verified
thoughts, opinions welcome
 
I can verify it, but as far as I understand it, the question is about wether you mind that others mind
You can be a sexist as you dang well please, that's only an issue if you actually want people who might be bothered by it to be around this place
 
8:56 AM
ppl dun care afaik
I think there's a bit o overthinking at work
 
Then I assume it's just plain curiosity? "Do girls dislike these things that we like?" <-- is that hte question?
 
more like do ppl get turned away after seeing a room of cute 2d girl pix?
 
Do women consume porn? Of course they do! Do they do it in the same way as men? Not a chance. Will naughty pics turn women away? Infuckingdeed it will,.
 
i.e. are we too hardcore shonen
 
8:59 AM
I can't read shounen any more.
 
@Gemtastic no pr0n here.. sry to disappoint
 
@Gemtastic same, I prefer drama to action based stuff now
 
I said naughty, not porn. The issue is that naughty pics aren't that far from porn to most women but mostly, the offputting part is the objectification.
Most sane women would deem this chat NSFW
 
@Gemtastic if you were to hypothetically participate, wut would you like to see more of? less of?
 
Normal anime/manga SFW images of all genders.
preferably recommendations
 
9:02 AM
what are your general thoughts about the state of things in general atm?
 
@Gemtastic that's an interesting idea, we could have a random posted anime/manga thing
 
@ToshinouKyouko ?
 
@ToshinouKyouko I think that's be more of a discussion opener too; "Has anyone read that? Is it good?"
@ʞɹɐzǝɹ Oblivious as fuck. You're all pretty nice people. I filter the things I don't like because it's not that bad of a place to hang. I haven't disclosed my gender but I highly doubt you'd treat me any differently if I did or now that I kinda have.
But you're still kinda oblivious to a lot of things :P
 
@Gemtastic I prefer calling it "naive"
 
@ʞɹɐzǝɹ In my opinion it's closer to pure ignorance, (do note though that I'm not referring to willful ignorance, I can't stand that shit, pure ignorance isn't bad, just people being oblivious to things they don't already know)
 
9:10 AM
@Gemtastic where should we look at to be less so?
 
@ʞɹɐzǝɹ It's a good start to not name the chat "maid café".
 
@Gemtastic I blame @Mysticial for that
 
10
Q: 2014 Edition: What should we call our chat room?

ʞɹɐzǝɹNow that we've made it past the one year mark, lets take sometime and consider if we should have a fancier name for our main chatroom. The previous post from over a year ago favored, the generic "Anime and Manga Chat" name as the name. I personally think we should come up with something unique l...

 
lol
I never saw that post. Thanks @Unihedron :)
 
The group hanging here is pretty small and homogenous so there's not that many people types to cater to. It doesn't really matter if you change or not unless you're actively looking to increase the populous here
 
9:12 AM
One of the N essential questions of Private Beta (N constantly changing so I don't want to use a constant) is the name for the chat room, usually unique per site culture and are supposed to make things fun. The "Maid Cafe" was upvoted as the best, so it won.
@EroSɘnnin my pleasure!
 
@Unihedron Most votes were from guys (?) :P
 
I don't know good enough to make a judgement for this question. :p
 
@Gemtastic as you mentioned we are quite oblivious on a lot of thing, expanding and diversifying being two of them
 
0
A: What should we call our chat room?

JNatName: Lollipop Heaven Description: General discussion for anime.stackexchange.com. Where the loli lovers thrive. anime loli manga The Great MadaraUchiha-sama proposed this on chat, and people seemed to like it there. So the name has been changed to this as of Dec 22nd 2013. Does not mean ...

^ At least that name didn't win ;)
 
there are a lot of downvoted answers there :P
 
9:16 AM
One good strategy is to ensure that your main chat is SFW, not because people only are on here at work but because it's less likely to offend anyone and make others feel less invited
 
@Gemtastic It is SFW
 
I don't feel like that's the problem being discussed.
 
I guess you meant readily welcoming to a broader scope than just anime & manga lovers?
 
From what I gather, the hypothesis is that constantly posting images of "cute girls" in chat, regardless of states of undress, could make some people, and especially females, in our chatroom, feel uncomfortable
 
9:18 AM
Why don't we just call in somebody (a girl) and ask what they think of the room?
 
@MadaraUchiha Ecchi isn't safe for work...
 
@EroSɘnnin That would be @Gemtastic
 
whups
sorry ':)
 
I'm fine in my current workplace as noone sits near me, but I probably wouldn't go on chat if in my new workplace, I have people who can see my screen
 
9:19 AM
@ToshinouKyouko Then it's definitely not sfw
 
Maybe seperate the main chat from the fun chat :P
 
In that case images posted in chat are to be SFW
That's not up for negotiation.
 
Would a command for hiding a picture into an inline link instead help?
like #fold
 
@MadaraUchiha That's what I referred to as making it SFW mainly. The actual conversations here as far as I've seen are fine
 
I'm not in chat as much as I'd like, but if it's going to be an issue then Taisho's database needs tweaking.
@Unihedron No.
 
9:21 AM
k
 
Since the discussion was raised to begin with, it obviously bothers someone
 
I already suggested it could be changed to normal SFW anime/manga pics. Since the purpose of the bot is to bring some activity when it's quiet, it could serve as a good conversation starter
 
My take on this, if Taisho's images are not safe for work, which is what I was led to believe, they are to be removed.
If you cannot discern NSFW images from SFW images in the database, then Taisho will be removed from the room.
 
16 hours ago, by Frosteeze
What I would propose is making the pictures more strict and include non-girls related pictures too.
 
@Hakase cc
 
9:23 AM
I say ALL genders because.. Gender-Bending 8D
 
it's not like only cisgendered people exist.
I think the above quoted message seems to be positively received from your responses and should be made into an answer for the Meta post to be voted on.
 
I'm not cis
 
TMI :(
 
wtf?
 
nth
bfn
 
9:26 AM
@Gemtastic cisgendered == !transgendered
 
well... ya... ^
 
It's not like I said "lift my skirt and take a look at my D" (which I don't have btw, I'm the other way around)
@MadaraUchiha I KNOW. If anyone, I know :P
 
o/ @JNat
 
@MadaraUchiha \o
 
yeah that wasn't cool
 
9:28 AM
Hello!
 
Hi everyone!
 
Hi @JNat
 
So, there was some message for me up there, right? Let me see....
@Unihedron Lol, I was looking at that with my avatar, and read "Lollipop heaven" and I was like wtf
 
@JNat yep, you did post this :D
 
9:31 AM
Yeah, but that name didn't come from my head
:P
'Cause I was wondering "Why on earth would I propose that name?!?"
 
I'm not going to judge your proposed names :)
 
I am :)
 
slowly looks away from Toshinou
 
but I know you're all lovely anyway, so it won't affect my opinions :3
 
:p
 
9:38 AM
"I may judge you but I won't hate you"
 
@LoganM This is absolutely right. Furthermore, if there's a discussion in chat we don't wanna lose, we can always bookmark it for future reference
 
at least I'm honest :3
 
 
1 hour later…
10:47 AM
in Maid Café (メイド喫茶), 50 secs ago, by Unihedron
How about review the pictures and don't onebox the questionable ~ NSFW content?
 
11:01 AM
@Unihedron How?
 
@MadaraUchiha preceed with a dot or inline link instead? // picture of questionable rating
 
@Unihedron That's not what I'm asking.
How do you differentiate between SFW and NSFW on the bot level?
 
Oh, the reviewing process will require human attention.
 
@Unihedron How is that different from removing NSFW altogether?
 
I don't know.
It requires 1 click to see, so it's not shown by default I guess.
 
 
9 hours later…
8:07 PM
I'm fine with Taisho posting pics. But I agree, they should be of multiple genders (guys too, that is), and even have some that have no genders, and above all, all be SFW.
Thanks @Gemtastic for giving us some input from outside the community.
 
 
1 hour later…
9:09 PM
Woah, what's this room?
 
9:22 PM
Meta discussion is still on-topic in the main room, but we go here so that it's easier to peruse the discussions at large before they get posted to the Meta site.
 

« first day (15 days earlier)      last day (79 days later) »