The words used is subjective. Java programmers call it "super" and "sub". C++ programmers call it "base" and "derived". Similarly, Java programmers call class functions "methods" and C++ programmers call it "members". Some people mix match. You may have programmers that use other languages calling it "base". Personally I still call it "base" class and "derived" class. So it's entirely up to that individual. — Brandon 1 min ago

There is no export 'limit'. This is the problem with asking for legal advice on a programmers forum. — GregS 1 min ago

1) Why code an applet? If it is due to the teacher specifying it, please refer them to Why CS teachers should stop teaching Java applets. 2) Java GUIs have to work on different OS', screen size, screen resolution etc. As such, they are not conducive to pixel perfect layout. Instead use layout managers, or combinations of them along with layout padding and borders for white space. — Andrew Thompson 41 secs ago

meta.programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/6166/… — GoBusto 1 min ago

Since this is about your GCSE programming problem, please do read Open letter to students with homework problems. — Martijn Pieters 43 secs ago

meta.programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/6483/… — sjdowling 1 min ago

You should do some google here. there are lot of link available like w3programmers.com/crud-with-php-and-mysql — railsbox 1 min ago

Not according to the people who run this site. See meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/274963/… and meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/286713/…. Try the Programmers Stack Exchange. — CommonsWare 2 mins ago

heh, the part where I know expert programmers made those implementations is exactly why I wanted to use their implementations instead, so no offense taken :P And the reason I'm stuck with this class instead of just using something from java is that the rest of the code is huge and relies on this class already, not that it would matter though, since, like you've mentioned, using ints instead of Integers if/when I can is better. Anyway, this pretty much covers everything so thank you for the great answer :) — NerdOnline 28 secs ago

1) Why code an applet? If it is due to the teacher specifying it, please refer them to Why CS teachers should stop teaching Java applets. 2) Why use AWT? See this answer for many good reasons to abandon AWT using components in favor of Swing. — Andrew Thompson 1 min ago

Go to programmers.stackexchange.com and ask there. — SHAZ 33 secs ago

@SHAZ This question is not appropriate for Programmers. We do not accept recommendations for services. Please do not recommend sites to people if you do not have a full understanding of their scope - if people bring low quality or off-topic questions to Programmers, they'll end up being quickly closed and maybe even blocked because of bad advice from other users. — Thomas Owens 1 min ago

@JuniorCompressor, you have to remember programmers are lazy ;) — Padraic Cunningham 25 secs ago

seriously, ask google(apple) ... or lawyer ... It will be better for you as here are mostly programmers and the answer can be: I heard that someone did it(or not) and did not(did) face (any) consequences ... in such problems programmers are not a good source of knowladge — Selvin 1 min ago

I know that C++ isn't Java and that it doesn't have my back (not sure Java does have my back, though). I'm just convinced that the "paying for what you use" concept is only applicable in non-debug/non-development builds. .at() always has a runtime cost, even in release builds. I was just trying to understand why standard library programmers decided against using asserts in debug/development builds. You're not expected to get maximum performance in non-release builds, so why not sacrifice a little more performance for safety and productivity while we're at it? — Vittorio Romeo 2 mins ago

@SHAZ Feel free to read this too: What goes on Programmers.SE? A guide for StackOverflow — durron597 46 secs ago

yeah. I guess it's designer's eye for whom it's obvious I wouldn't want the thing to be on top or bottom of container if posting that image... programmers eye looks at the code ;) — suMi 34 secs ago

@KerrekSB Absolutely true. At the same time, that doesn't mean C++ programmers shouldn't worry about such things, even in portable code. — Angew 2 mins ago

@Cyber I know. it is not uncommon for bad teachers to try to miss the point of encapsulation and instead of teaching people how to USE std::vector and then AFTER teaching them how to implement it, they mix the two and produces thousands upon thousands of terrible "C-style" C++ programmers. But I guess resistance is futile... — Félix Cantournet 21 secs ago

CultureInfo is for programmers, CurrentCulture is for users and is likely to be localized by the installed .NET language pack. — Hans Passant 1 min ago

@Velthune, I'd agree with that if comments are kept anonymous. I also think that's a question many C programmers can ask themselves. — cmbarbu 2 mins ago

Then you'll have to define your values, and that's subjective. "Advantage" could mean easier to program, lower memory requirements, faster to execute, etc. You maybe have some hot-shot C# programmers on your team, and Xamarin with all it's drawbacks, bugs and quirks may make sense over training/hiring a native developer. Or it may not. — 323go 33 secs ago

The Redundant array creation inspection works nicely and was exactly what I was looking for. Your proposition for the adjustment of the structural search query does not only work nicely as well but it also taught me something new about IntelliJ. Here goes my advice for fellow programmers stumbling across this problem: Keep in mind that there are additional settings for the structural search variables (hint: Edit variables...) that may need to be adjusted to fit your needs. — jimonthebarn 2 mins ago

believe it or not this is a common mistake that most programmers do.. I am glad that I was able to see the problem and or issue immediately without wasting any of your valuable time.. I will put it down as an answer and you can accept it as the working fix if you like thanks again — MethodMan 46 secs ago

I'm going to disagree with "If there is no announcement there should not be an announcement". In this case, I believe the sentiment is accurate. However, there are many cases where TalkBack's (or any AT's) feedback is less than ideal. Programmers should do their best to make their apps as accessible as possible, despite the limitations placed on them by the Framework and AT they happen to be working with. — ChrisCM 12 secs ago

Here you go, please use Google next time programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/97615/… — Mo H. 2 mins ago

Git has programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/111633/… — Pacerier 1 min ago

This is a very good question, but not for Stack Overflow. You should ask it on programmers.stackexchange.com instead. — Jubobs 2 mins ago

I did read the caveats, did you read it? It is an over-simplified sample which is not useful for new programmers like myself. And even when I follow experienced programmers' suggestions of using .loc, same warnings persist (as below). — KubiK888 1 min ago

@Jubobs In its current form, it would get closed as too broad on Programmers.SE with a comment to read where to start. I would suggest reading What goes on Programmers.SE? A guide for Stack Overflow to get a better idea for the scope for Programmers.SE... and all that said, I'm really not sure git source code would be a good place to start trying to learn how to program C. — MichaelT 33 secs ago

@MichaelT Duly noted. If the question was somewhat narrowed down, I believe it would have find a good home on Programmers.SE, though. — Jubobs 32 secs ago

This has nothing to do with C or programming of any kind. It's an OS question: if I overwrite a file, can I recover it? Well, that depends on which OS you are using, but for 99% of them, the answer is no. Yet another reason programmers use Git. — Lee Daniel Crocker 1 min ago

It is just a tip, the most common reason for the exception. Most programmers know why conversion to Decimal won't work when they look at the string with the debugger. Why you don't show us is hard to guess. — Hans Passant 2 mins ago

Your snippet doesn't reproduce the problem. But it is troublesome code, the kind that gets programmers that use CreateGraphics() in trouble all the time as well. It won't work correctly if the background redraws itself, that erases the frame and now the second call doesn't erase anymore but leaves a visible rectangle. You shouldn't be using this, it isn't 1992 anymore. Flickers like a cheap motel anyway. Call Invalidate(), use e.Graphics.DrawRectangle() in OnPaint(). If that's too slow then make the background image fast by paying attention to the size and the pixel format. — Hans Passant 1 min ago

meta.programmers.stackexchange.com/q/6166 — GoBusto 1 min ago

I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it belongs on programmers.stackexchange.com — David Wallace 1 min ago