Which worries me sometimes, because he knows enough to sound plausible, but what he says is usually wrong (even if he has a good point somewhere, it's almost always buried in something, anything he could find to claim that I wrote something wrong, when all I did was to write something that's perfectly correct but goes against one of his pet peeve).
@FaheemMitha I have to read them and find out that it's by him
@FaheemMitha Yes. Yesterday the asker asked why my answer was downvoted. I wonder what to tell him.
There was a slurry of comments by mikeserv, where he claimed a lot of things I wrote were wrong. In this case, he didn't have anything to propose, he just said he didn't believe a bunch of things, when looking them up in the manual would have backed me up.
@Gilles The best thing would be to ask SE to enforce a permanent ban on him commenting on your posts. But from the question you linked to, it seems they can't or won't do that.
He doesn't systematically downvote me, only when I fail to rub him right on one of his pet topics. If I don't mention any of his pet topics (initramfs, dd, quoting variable expansions, ...) he does upvote some of my answers.
At some point the mods told me to stop commenting on his posts or replying to his comments on pains of suspension, and that they'd told him the same thing.
Which suited me fine because I was already doing that.
But evidently they're no longer enforcing that.
mikeserv has changed a bit. He used to be very insulting in his comments. Now he's polite on the surface, though his discourse is still bent on exposing me for an incompetent.
And I don't claim to be an expert, not like, say, Stéphane.
But mikeserv's comments invariably show that there's something he doesn't get, and he blames me for that.
On a personal note I wish I could ignore him. But I'm also uncomfortable leaving his incorrect-but-not-obviously-so comments uncorrected.
I'm a bit surprised that I seem to be the only person he's latched onto.
Now when I write a post I start wondering which pet peeve of mikeserv I'm going to trigger. Should I mikeserv-proof my post by explaining why I choose a particular tool that he doesn't like and why his favorite tool doesn't work for this job? And invariably I don't, because it would be totally useless to the rest of the audience, and because some of his peeves are subjective (e.g. what he considers clear code wouldn't pass code review in any serious professional environment).
@Gilles well, I wish I could help. If there is any way I can, please let me know. And I can't speak for other users here, but I'm sure all the regulars (and probably many others) don't want to see you quit the site out of disgust.
While we are not all friends here (we mostly don't really know each other) we should strive to keep this a courteous professional atmosphere.
hi all, Does anybody know the best web page to read "In the beginning was the command-line" and Neal Stephenson's comments to it. I saw a page a few days ago which had both his comments and the essay in a paragraph -style. One or two paragraphs of what is being told or shared and then Neal's take on that but can't find it, can somebody find it ? And it's not cristal.inria.fr/~weis/info/commandline.html unfortunately.
Hacker with bullhorn: "Save your money! Accept one of our free tanks! It is invulnerable, and can drive across rocks and swamps at ninety miles an hour while getting a hundred miles to the gallon!"
to
Buyer: "Stay away from my house, you freak!"
Bullhorn: "But..."
Buyer: "Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?"