I don't know where else to go mate.. i don't know any programmers and this is a curious subject for me. Anything wrong with asking for advice from experts? — Chuck 1 min ago

@Yakk I didn't say it was an error and the question was in fact on how to use a template function without specifying the type. How should anybody just know that leaving out the type specifier would do the trick? To me it seemed like something that would just cause an error. Should people just randomly try things and never ask questions? As for the topic, I believe this question falls under "software tools commonly used by programmers", as in the language c++. — user81993 1 min ago

asking for the Lagrange agnostic logic in programmers.stackexchange.com will get you more answers than here — Dagon 48 secs ago

This kind of question is probably better on (Programmers StackExchange)[programmers.stackexchange.com/]. SO is for specific programming related questions. — Shashank 1 min ago

@dr_andonuts, that's a very broad statement. — Simon MᶜKenzie 1 min ago

I'm not too familiar with the technologies you have listed. But in general the best practice (as far as I know) is to let the user authenticate once (pass the request securely down through all the layers) and then replace user's identity with opaque time-limited authorization token that travels wherever a whichever layer needs some authorization approval. Search for OAuth protocol and Social login. You may try to move ("flag for moderator's attention") your question to programmers.stackexchange.com under some of the design tags if you don't get acceptable answer here — xmojmr 28 secs ago

Slow down there pardner, that's a lot of question marks for a single question. I'd recommend tidying this up so we can work out exactly what you're asking, rather the guessing among the many questions you've got here. Also if you're asking a theoretical question about the MVC pattern it probably belongs on Programmers.SE rather than here, we only really deal with 'keyboard' problems rather than 'whiteboard' ones. — Aiken 1 min ago

U can, still, use facebook chat on facebook.com, or fb messeger. But the programmers cannot create chat applications which connect with facebook chat. Also, chat with facebook friends in outlook online will be not available. — vothaison 52 secs ago

Looks like this has been extensively discussed here. — yole 1 min ago

I think programmers.stackexchange.com would be more suitable for conceptual feedback — GrawCube 2 mins ago

Looks like it is the case other way round. Rather than looking at the code and output you're just looking at highlighted text, that is now how programmers work. — anubhava 1 min ago

Harder for the implementers of the JCOP OS (they're programmers too!) — TonyK 1 min ago

This is not the right place for tool-recommendations. Try to ask it on a different site like programmers.stackexchange.com. — Tim Schmelter 1 min ago

Just to complicate, how to we know the policeman shoots the nearest individual first (or is it random). It seems unfair that the policemant can move 'away' from the thieves. Either way, you should probably ask this on programmers, not here on SO. Also include an attempt to code your answer, and indicate where your problem is. Looking at your rep you should probably know this by now. — DaveM 1 min ago

@TimSchmelter this is a very bad fit for Programmers, see meta.programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/6483/… Recommended reading: What goes on Programmers.SE? A guide for Stack Overflow — gnat 1 min ago

Given that you say you want to avoid "resorting to coding it the hard way", it's hard to see this as anything other than a request for code (off-topic everywhere on SE) or a request for broad guidance on approach (off-topic on SO, maybe on-topic on Programmers - see programmers.stackexchange.com/help/asking). — jonrsharpe 1 min ago

This discussion at Programmers is similar to your question: How to use unit tests when using BDD? — Greg Burghardt 28 secs ago

Overlapping Matches, troubling programmers since ages — Bhargav Rao 1 min ago

@Dagon as written, this is a bad fit for Programmers - it would be quickly voted down and closed over there, see Why do interview questions make poor Programmers.SE questions? Recommended reading: What goes on Programmers.SE? A guide for Stack Overflow — gnat 53 secs ago

See programmers.stackexchange.com/questions/3519/… — bwegs 28 secs ago

I don't want to move that array to controller's scope because it doesn't "belong" there. Plus, I want variable declared as close as possible to place of their usage. Seems like what I am doing is definitely best done server side. — kape123 23 secs ago

The definition of insanity for parallel programmers is to do the same thing over and over and expect the same result :P — Jason Sperske 49 secs ago

@LanceVo And I'm grateful to veteran programmers who told me when I was being an idiot. — Halfstop 1 min ago

You've got a lot of questions in your question. While I think there is a lot of interesting discussions possible, I don't think this is a good fit for Stack Overflow. It might be better to split your question up into Programmers Stack Exchange and maybe the DB Stack Exchange? (though double check that your question(s) are on topic there). While saying that, a general rule of thumb is to not double post across sites so avoid doing that. — Turnerj 18 secs ago