« first day (1112 days earlier)      last day (3538 days later) » 

12:15 AM
....what a wondrous thing context is. I didn't know who that was until I looked it up. >_>
 
 
2 hours later…
1:52 AM
0
Q: is it on topic to ask for a refutation of a source you trust?

Peter TurnerI asked [this question] not (merely) to pick a fight but because I really want to know whether there is a refutation of Hilaire Bellocs rather astounding claims before I go off and believe they are true. That, I believe is the point of inquiry and the exact point of this site. I know the ques...

 
2:28 AM
@PeterTurner That doesn't align any version of history I'm familiar with, in particular I find it impossible to reconcile with the Wikipedia article on The Holy Roman Empire. Ignoring the academics is just not credible - England's clerics were overwhelmingly trained in England, so when it came to the Church, the direction that Oxford took on these matters, England would eventually follow.
with regards to Tyndale, perhaps you're not familiar with the fact that with regard to his "The Obedience of a Christian Man [: when it] fell into the hands of Henry VIII, the king found the rationale to break the Church in England from the Roman Catholic Church in 1534." - source
 
3:15 AM
Hey guys!
 
howdy
 
How popular is the subject of evolution on this site?
 
3:27 AM
@TRiG interesting edit + purge ;)
 
@bruisedreed I think the power of the Catholic Church has always been in the fact that the common man is the one who keeps her traditions. A good and Godly priest I know said he'd rather my wife and I raise our children to raise more Catholic children than prep them for religious life.
and I think it's within my rights as a internet citizen to question the abundance of "David Daniel" links on that wikipedia site. That guy is obsessed with Tyndale, probably thinks he invented pants as well.
 
@J.Musser the topic certainly gets a run from time to time
 
yeah, the top questions are on evolution I think
 
@PeterTurner "probably thinks he invented pants as well." - lol!
 
I'm a creationist, from the Gardening and Landscaping site. But I only wondered, because all answers posted on Biology, from a creationists point of view, get deleted. :(
 
3:34 AM
@J.Musser generally you're not supposed to even ask a question that could have a creationist answer and a... regular (for lack of a better term) answer.
I used to participate a lot on the gardening site. Is it ever going to get out of the beta?
 
@PeterTurner Questions like 'why is this animal this way?'
 
@PeterTurner If only it were so - but just how can the 'common man' really keep the tradition of the church when the liturgy is actually incomprehensible to him - at best he's only satisfying some superstitious impulse and acting the best he can according to his conscience (maybe this last explains why it's a good idea - he doesn't necessarily follow the example of hypocritical clergy)
 
Now questions that promote creationism get closed as 'primarily opinion based', and then get deleted.
 
@J.Musser yeah, that's what the powers that be would call a "Truth Question" and those are quaesitum non grata
 
@PeterTurner Yeah, I have 14.8k there, and am hoping that it graduates soon. Most of the initial supporters are gone, 24 off the front page, leaving 13.
I counted you as gone, cause you really aren't doing anything. The worst is bstpierre, who doesn't do anything either.
@PeterTurner There should be a real biology site.
 
3:40 AM
@J.Musser I think if the question said "According to proponents of Y.E.C. why are dogs so friendly" you'd be OK (as long as the answer can include tobit)
Yeah, I'm a bit of a bum, my garden is just doing really good (except for the Japanese beetles)
@bruisedreed I'm not sure that people found Christ so incomprehensible then as they find Christianity incomprehensible today.
@J.Musser you mean like an intelligent design site?
 
@PeterTurner Well, a biology site for those who need the real explanation. It seems a lot of biology has to do with evolution, on the regular site.
 
4:10 AM
@PeterTurner or @MattGutting ... I'm still not sold on the necessity for Catholics to believe in a literal Adam and Eve. Fr. Barron (of word on fire / the Catholicism series) heavily suggests on more than one instance that Genesis is not to be taken literally... The implication of which is pretty directly extended to Adam and Eve.
Are there any sources you're aware if that make the statement dogmatic and binding?
... I'm poking both of you because I seem to recall you both gave answers and comments on recent questions to the effect of the belief in a literal Adam and Eve being binding.
 
4:28 AM
Is there anybody who writes about Christian ethics for non-believers? Not that people would ever do such a thing, but still... if it's possible for Buddhists to share Buddhist ethics or thought process, then maybe it's possible for Christians to share the same and provide a way to deal with life.
 
@svidgen, me neither. I've been thinking it and I'll possibly utter heresy here (don't tell your children this). But if God made Adam in His Image and what this means is God made our Soul in His Image (he has no physical body, so it's not like God pulled His reflection out of His mirror and created man.)
So the heresy I'm pondering is, could it mean that God created human nature in Adam and Eve, and the people with Immortal Souls are their descendents. There were others, but they've gotten absorbed into the fold though marriage.
I was thinking about this yesterday and it probably is why some people thought women didn't have souls, but that's not a necessary conclusion...
But it's definitely why people would doubt as to whether pygmies have souls. But that's not a necessary conclusion either.
 
@anonymous have you ever read E.F. Schumacher (A Guide for the Perplexed)? He as a Jew who converted to Catholicism before his death (much to the consternation of his family and friends). But his books have as much Buddhism as they do Christiantiy.
 
@PeterTurner ... Pygmies?!
 
@svidgen missing the plugin on my linux computer, hopefully I can make it out from the comments....
 
4:38 AM
@PeterTurner blasphemy!
 
@svi yeah, well you'd wonder if a group was never touched by civilization whether or not they were descendents of Adam and Eve. That would be Objection #4 if I were writing a very bad summa.
 
Gah ... Children are awake! Someone make my children go back to sleep..
 
@svidgen oofta, it's pretty late for wee ones. Hey barring sickness or general business, we'll probably go to the All Saints Party in Pine Bluff this year, hopefully I'll see you and your family there.
In the meantime, I really want to find the answer to that question.
 
@PeterTurner I'll look into it. (The party.) I'm not one for parties myself. But the wife might motivate me to go!
 
4:56 AM
@J.Musser Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution -- Theodosius Dobzhansky, who was a world-class entomologist and a Russian Orthodox Christian.
Oops, that link just goes to a paper discussion Dobzhansky's talk. Here's a link to the original‌​.
 
Meant to tag @Peter on that link.
 
5:19 AM
And then there's this. catholicreview.org/article/work/…
 
@svidgen oh yeah, it's lots of fun, we don't do it every year, but we'll probably go this year.
@svidgen that seems to imply it's a mystery and my nice little heresy isn't useful.
 
 
6 hours later…
Zoe
11:17 AM
 
 
1 hour later…
12:45 PM
0
Q: Is it problematic to own and use a Swiss Gear bag?

GavrielThe Swiss Gear bags and back packs have the image of the Swiss flag (usually in color, red and white, and made out of a hard material) sewn into the material. Often the Swiss flag's image is put on other area's of the bag as well. My question is: Does the Swiss flag's white (equilateral) cross p...

 
Zoe
1:15 PM
Hello @C.Ross
 
1:37 PM
@Zoe Good morning/evening! :-)
 
Zoe
@MattGutting 9:38 pm here~
 
@Zoe I know - you're 12 hours ahead. (Convenient for me. If I want to know what time it is for you, I just switch AM and PM; no adding or subtracting involved. :-) )
But if I say "good night" it sounds like you're leaving.
 
Zoe
@MattGutting LOL That's nice! Btw, have you tried fasting before?
Ikr. But evening sounds too early
There should be a term for nights
 
@Zoe Depending on your definition of fasting, Catholics do it every year. (not as much as we used to.) What's up with fasting?
 
Zoe
@MattGutting I'm on the sixth of my seven day liquid fast, and these two days I bought a bunch of empty calories on impulse. Lol.
For protestants, I think fasting is like a, do it as when needed kind of thing. There is a book by Kenneth E. Hagin on that
 
1:44 PM
@Zoe Just watch your health. The human body isn't designed to take in only liquids.
Catholics basically do - Have one regular size meal, and up to two meals that add up to one regular-size meal.
 
Zoe
My mentor says fasting is a declaration of war because it weakens the flesh and strengthens the Spirit, And that in another realm, a spiritual war is going on. What do you think?
 
@Zoe That's definitely a reasonable way to think of it.
 
Zoe
@MattGutting Sometimes I think that too. And I wonder how people can do the Daniel fast. But then, if God can save St. Augustine, God can also make proteins and iron magically appear in our body to sustain us. I mean, or God can just sustain us.
 
@Zoe One of the descriptions in the catechism says that it "helps us acquire mastery over our instincts".
What's the Daniel fast?
 
Zoe
@MattGutting Well, not sure about that but it is true that when we fast, our senses are heightened. Esp sense of hearing and smell.
@MattGutting 21 day fast, i think liquid and vegetables or just liquid, I'm not entirely sure. But yea its from the Bible
Also, how well do you know about familiar spirits?
 
1:48 PM
@Zoe When I fast, I do it because it helps me remember that there are more important human needs than food, and I turn to fulfilling those needs.
@Zoe Little or nothing. What's the context?
 
Zoe
@MattGutting I see. I am weak, when I fast, I get behind on prayer and reading the Bible. Sigh, I think God is disappointed.
 
@Zoe Well, why do you fast? Would God be disappointed in your reason, or in your resolution?
 
Zoe
@MattGutting My mentor says that, some pastors or priest who seem to be very anointed can tell me alot of things about me and my problems. But it could be my familiar spirit revealing these things to them. She also says familiar spirits have been around since the Fall and they high in principality ranking. They are also attached to DNA and bloodlines.
 
Is a "familiar spirit" something from the Bible? I don't remember it; and it doesn't seem familiar from my tradition.
 
Zoe
@MattGutting I am supposed to ask for God's grace and mercy to cleanse me of the familiar spirit. I have been having dreams all the time and one of them revealed that I have one and need to get rid of it, if not it will taint my gifts from God. I also asked (not in prayer) why I could not sustain my will to follow God and He gave me the dream that revealed that I have a familiar spirit. So the evangelist and my wednesday church said to fast for 7 days.
@MattGutting Yea, but only in Leviticus.
I keep searching online about them, but I cant really find on what my mentor said.
But she gave me an example, that when it comes to war times, and I have to lead a group of people out the wilderness, I might unintentionally go the wrong way and cause all of us to die. Because the familiar spirit will taint my dreams and decision making.
 
1:55 PM
@Zoe How can gifts from God be "tainted"? Remember, "Nothing that enters one from outside can defile that person" (Mark 7:15)
 
Zoe
I dont fully comprehend but then again, it's a command so I'll follow. But obviously I'm not doing a very good job at fasting lol. I told God that I would just wanna complete the fast in an above average manner. And then He gave me another dream, to me it meant "Stand firm on your faith and let Me do the rest"
@MattGutting I guess because the flesh wars against the Spirit? And also because my mentor says I may have witchcraft in my bloodline, and I am very inclined to fantasy so it might taint my dreams and visions.
 
@Zoe If you're fulfilling your vow to God, I'd say you're "completing the fast in an above average manner". I don't think God is disappointed.
@Zoe I don't believe witchcraft can be "in someone's bloodline". It's an act of an individual person; it affects that person; it's not passed down from one to another.
Again: "the life of the parent is like the life of the child, both are mine. Only the one who sins shall die!"
 
Zoe
@MattGutting Ikr. During my fast, I also wonder how I could be suffering from the mistakes of the past. But there are too many Scripture that indicate God would punish the descendants of idolaters and stuff. So, it may or may not be.
@MattGutting Do you think that the kind of environment you grow up in would cause you to sin in a certain way? Like when I was younger, I burnt offerrings for the dead and went to buddhist funerals and visited graves and such. I just did it because it's tradition and expected
@MattGutting So, that may be a way for the sins of the parents be passed to the child? Also to note, that is the only verse that may account for sins being one person's and not passed down.
 
@Zoe I believe that if you do activities not knowing that they are sins, God will not hold you accountable for the wrongs you do - he is "gracious and merciful, slow to anger, abounding in steadfast love, and relenting in punishment" (Joel 2:13).
 
Zoe
@MattGutting I guess. But they are in the past now. And now idk if that's what it is or why this familiar spirit exists with me
I cant really find stuff about it like what my mentor said
But trust God I guess
 
2:09 PM
@Zoe I will not tell you not to trust your mentor; but this stuff about a "familiar spirit" worries me and it seems to me you are being given a burden that perhaps you do not deserve. Trust God, of course, at all times.
And pray always.
 
Zoe
@MattGutting My inner thoughts and inclinations are always betraying me
@MattGutting Yes. I confessed to God that maybe I wasn't as committed to Him as I thought I was. Sigh, I do not know if I could ever serve God. I am neither here nor there.
 
@Zoe If you're praying to God, then isn't that serving him?
How much St. Augustine have you read? I would like to read the Confessions, because sometimes I feel like that too. And it seems like he did too. And he's a saint.
 
Zoe
@MattGutting What do you mean by "he did too"? He did what?
@MattGutting I think my church has a different definition of serving God? It's doing the Will of God for us. My calling.
 
@Zoe And how shall you know what is the Will of God?
@Zoe He felt just like you did - that he might not be committed to serving God as firmly as he should be.
 
Zoe
@MattGutting When He reveals what He wants us to do?
 
2:23 PM
@Zoe And how does He reveal that? How is it that you can dispose yourself to hear him?
 
Zoe
@MattGutting Oh... I see... that's comforting, alittle. The only thing I have read of St. Augustine is that he was an immoral man before God showed him a verse in Romans.
 
@Zoe Here's what I'm seeing on Wikiquote: Augustine says, first:
As a youth I prayed, "Give me chastity and continence, but not yet."
And then he says,
 
Zoe
@MattGutting In Numbers, God listed 5 ways He would speak to His people. Dreams, Visions, Dark Speech, Audible speech and one more I forgot. Ofcourse He can use other ways to speak to us His will
 
Hi all.
 
@C.Ross Hi!
 
Zoe
2:26 PM
And yea, my church does always say to die to ourselves and submit to God
@C.Ross Hellow
 
@Zoe You typically set yourself up to hear his Voice by praying to him.
 
@PeterTurner and @MattGutting ... In light of the swarm of questions regarding Catholicism and interpreting Adam and Eve, I'm hoping to draw you (and any other well-educated Catholics) into a chat about it. In particular, how do we interpret Humani Generis and the extent to which its statements on Adam and Eve are binding and immutable.
 
@svidgen Should we set up a Room?
 
Zoe
@MattGutting My evangelist says the dreams and visions are a gift from God. To be completely honest, I am always doubting. You know how you hear testimonies of people who say they felt extreme peace/joy/happiness when the have an experience with God? Or when God spoke to them , they knew it was Him? Even some Christians who, before they were converted, had such experience. I never had one. I never ever knew that the dream is from God. I either get a slight feeling hmm maybe God means...
 
Oops ... I did. Didn't link it.

 Adam and Eve in Catholicism

Whether it's required of Catholics to believe in a literal Ada...
I'm getting some background info up top there real quicklike.
 
Zoe
2:32 PM
So I do doubt my dreams all the time
 
@Zoe God is certainly capable of appearing to us in dreams. But I don't think that's typical.
 
Zoe
@MattGutting I mean, 'cause I don't have such experiences with God, that I don't 100% believe they are gifts
Sometimes I think, if there is a message in there, I think He is too vague.
 
@Zoe In that case, you have to ask where they're coming from. Could they just be inside you?
Or if you think they're vague, are you putting requirements on God that he just doesn't want to fulfill?
 
Zoe
@MattGutting Well, the evangelist did interpret some of my dreams to be related to my calling. And he did say that the dreams sometimes are inaccurate so I have to train them
Idk how to train them.... I pray to God always to block all the dreams that are not from Him and plead the Blood.
@MattGutting I do think that my inclination of comparison is withholding God's whatever.
Since I am new to these, my flesh is really strong
There are days I dont even want to try and there are days where I am good
There was this one time not too long ago that I got a dream, and a vision within that dream, and woke up extremely exhausted (because I was exhausted in the dream after the vision ended) and said that God is magnificent. I'm not sure that counts as an experience.
 
brb something just came up at work.
 
3:23 PM
hmf. Now let's see how quick people get back to me.
 
4:15 PM
Is it true in Christianity that people who believe in Jesus will go to heaven and those who don't will go to hell?
 
@WillHunting Depends on the variety of Christianity. I could answer "Yes for some, no for others"; but in fact there are all kinds of shadings and nuances that different denominations provide.
 
@MattGutting Ah OK. I think I know what you mean.
 
@WillHunting So, tell us the background. What makes you ask this question?
 
@MattGutting I am an ex-Christian. I believed but no longer believe. The answer to this question is very important to me, because I think the religion is unreasonable if the answer is yes.
@MattGutting I asked the same question but for Islam in the Islam room. And the answer seems to be yes there.
 
@WillHunting OK. So let's dig into this. Suppose the answer were "Yes". What do you feel that would tell you about the religion, that would make it seem unreasonable to you?
 
4:28 PM
@MattGutting I think that if the answer is yes, God would be evil. I feel that you cannot put people in hell just because they don't believe in something.
 
@WillHunting So you believe that people are "put in hell" by another?
 
@MattGutting Well, if the answer is yes, then they go to hell just because they did not believe. That is what I mean. I am not sure what you want to ask actually.
 
OK, let's go on to another question. Two more actually.
 
OK, I am free anyway.
 
(1) What do you mean when you say "believe in Jesus"?
(2) What do you mean when you say "go to Hell"?
 
4:32 PM
@MattGutting I think I specifically want to mean that they "receive Jesus as their Saviour and Lord".
@MattGutting I think I mean that they go to "a place of eternal suffering".
 
@WillHunting There are a number of Christian denominations (Orthodoxy and Catholicism, for example) that don't use that language; that's why I'm asking.
 
Will, Jesus said that He "and the Father (God) are one" & "If you've seen me, you've seen the Father" as well as "This is eternal life (heaven): that they may know you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ, whom you have sent" So the question is "Why would you worry about not going to Jesus's heaven by believing in him if Jesus's heaven is 'knowing' him?" - surely if you're rejecting the one, you reject both.
 
@MattGutting OK. The difference between denominations is also why I chose to ask this question in this chat, where there may be experts to answer.
 
@WillHunting Here's a Catholic approach (the only one I'm familiar with):
If you have never been introduced to the Catholic faith, then we maintain the hope that you will somehow be received by God into His kingdom, since God would not be so unjust as to condemn you for something you had no control over. On the other hand...
if you were introduced to the Catholic faith, and deliberately rejected it, then at death, you will be deliberately rejecting God - and this rejection, this final separation of yourself from God (which becomes eternal, since you can't change it after death), - that's Hell. You've put yourself there.
But you have up until the moment of death itself to change things.
 
@MattGutting And this is the Catholic approach?
 
4:39 PM
Yes; though I haven't perhaps stated it as clearly as a theologian would.
 
Of course, to be precise, I should say that is the Catholic approach according to you. =)
 
According to my (reasonably well-informed) understanding of Catholicism; indeed :-)
 
Nvm, I get it, so removed.
 
The answer is "Sort of, yes".
 
Yes, I think I get it now.
Well, I don't know how my beliefs will change.
 
4:42 PM
But with nuances. And you're not "put in hell" - you put yourself there by rejecting God.
 
But right now, I would think that it is unreasonable.
 
@WillHunting What leads you to believe that? If you reject God, is it unreasonable that there be consequences?
Or does the "unreasonable" come in some other way?
 
@MattGutting Yes, it is to me, though it may not be to you.
 
@WillHunting Understood. Well, at least, I see that it is the case for you. I'm not sure I understand why. But if you can't explain, or don't wish to, that's entirely fine. I'm not intending to change your beliefs.
 
@MattGutting It simply comes in this way: It is unreasonable to go to a place of suffering just because you reject God. Or did I get the facts wrong?
Of course, I have interpreted hell = place of suffering, not as separation from God.
However, if Hell = separation from God, then it is reasonable.
 
4:47 PM
@WillHunting Well, take an analogy. Suppose you've loved someone a long time. Then you decide you're going to break up with them - you decide you dislike them, or you can't be with them, or ... whatever. Is it unreasonable to believe that you're going to suffer some pain as a result of the breakup/divorce/whatever?
 
@MattGutting In this case, it is not unreasonable. However, the analogy does not hold the way I see it.
 
@WillHunting What fails?
 
just because you reject God = just rejecting the source of all that is good. A decision to irrevocably cut yourself off from the source of all that is good is bound to be unpleasant.
 
@MattGutting The pain is something you put yourself through in the case of a relationship. In the case of God, He puts you there since that is his rule.
 
@MattGutting excellent analogy
 
4:50 PM
@WillHunting That's very decidedly not the Catholic understanding of Hell. In the Catholic understanding of Hell, Hell is indeed "something you put yourself through".
 
@MattGutting A lot of Protestants too - we are not all double-predestinarians!
 
@MattGutting My analogy for saying it is unreasonable is this. Suppose you have a father, and you don't think he is a good person, then he throws you into fire for that.
God sounds like an abusive father to me, if what you say is true.
 
@WillHunting Agreed. I think that's unreasonable as well.
But suppose your understanding of "going to Hell" is not true?
@bruisedreed Predestinarians! I'll have to remember that one :-)
 
@MattGutting Well, I think Hell is described to be a place where people can burn in a lake of fire? I don't know.
 
@WillHunting Well, it's described that way. But how do you know that description is intended to be literally true?
 
4:56 PM
@MattGutting Well, even if it were not literally true, Hell does sound like a place of great suffering.
 
@WillHunting Certainly. So is one's state of mind after a divorce, or a breakup.
A divorce can lead to a "place" of very great suffering indeed.
 
I would like to share now what I think about the Christian God.
 
@WillHunting To miss the greatest of all opportunities and be aware that you've done so will cause intense suffering, there's no two ways about it.
 
@WillHunting Go right ahead :-)
 
I believe that the Christian God exists, but that the Bible is the perverted word of man. I believe that there are god realms where the beings are called gods, just like the beings in the human realms are called humans and the beings in the animal realms are called animals. This Christian God is just a being in the god realms, but he did not create the universe, nor will people go to hell for not believing in him.
 
5:00 PM
@WillHunting I'm not sure what you mean by "god realms". Are you simply saying that there are beings called "gods"?
 
@MattGutting They could be in a different dimension, somewhere we cannot travel to using normal modes of transport.
Also, I believe that this God is not eternal. He will pass away too, but after a very, very long time.
 
@WillHunting It would be better if you said "I believe a God exists etc." What you describe is not "the Christian God"
 
@WillHunting OK, that's fair. What leads you to believe specifically that God "did not create the universe"? Do you believe that there could exist a being who created the universe?
 
@bruisedreed I actually was referring to the being that Christians call God. He may have communicated to us in some ways, but the bible is his perverted word, not what he really said.
@MattGutting Yes, there could be a creator being, but I believe the universe has no creator. It just came about on its own.
 
user116848
hi
 
5:05 PM
@Arrowfar Hi! Welcome!
 
user116848
Thanks!
 
@WillHunting Well you seem very set on your own ideas and not particularly willing to listen to others, so there doesn't seem to be much point in you complaining about other people's beliefs and how unfair they seem.
 
@bruisedreed I am very willing to listen to others, which is why I came here.
 
@WillHunting Inviting a response but not considering the implications of the response is not really listening is it?
 
@WillHunting Why do you believe this? What has convinced you that this is reality?
 
5:08 PM
@WillHunting I'm willing to talk. Question for you: What leads you to the beliefs you have about the Christian God (as you understand the Christian God)?
@fredsbend Beat me by That Much!
 
Jinx
 
I think a large factor that led me to such beliefs is the Buddhist point of view. The realms of existence I spoke about came from there. All beings pass away and are then reborn in the various realms, with the realm and the quality of life in that realm determined by their past deeds.
However, I do not consider myself a follower of any faith.
 
@WillHunting Does that belief seem more reasonable to you than your understanding of Christianity?
 
@MattGutting Yes, it does seem fairer to me, though it may not to you. =)
The question now is, why do I even believe in the Christian God's existence? Let me elaborate.
 
Interesting conversation, but I'll leave you all to it - it's late here, so Good night all
 
5:12 PM
@WillHunting I was specifically asking about the belief that "all beings pass away and are reborn".
 
I don't think the bible is a total lie. For a book of such proportions to come about, there must be a grain of truth to it. There is then probably such a being which the Christians refer to as God.
@MattGutting Hmm, yup, that sounds more believable than eternal hell or eternal heaven or eternal life.
I also believe that the being the Christians, Muslims and Jews call God is one and the same being. Because of the similarity of the texts.
 
@WillHunting That's a statement that some, but not all, Christians will agree with.
@WillHunting More believable because? Is it because you believe people should be repaid according to what they do, perhaps?
 
@MattGutting Yes, something like that.
 
OK. The Christian position is slightly different; we believe that no matter what one does, there's nothing that one can do that can make one worthy of God.
 
@MattGutting Yes, because all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.
 
5:24 PM
@WillHunting Indeed.
 
Thanks, I am off.
 
 
1 hour later…
6:47 PM
@WillHunting Something seeming fairer is not evidence for its reality. Why do you believe this? Why do you believe that there must be a cosmic system that watches our deeds? Surely you have a reason for believing that there even is one. Then, of course, you surely have reason to believe this Buddhist amalgamation over Christianity. What are those reasons?
 
7:06 PM
@WillHunting And we're back (after these messages).
 
@fredsbend I agree that fairer is not evidence for truth. However, if the answer to my original question is yes, then, like I have said, God would be an evil being to me. However, I do not believe that this being is evil, and so I do not believe what the Christian is supposed to believe.
 
@WillHunting Even if the person rejecting God puts himself in Hell, and God doesn't?
 
@MattGutting Well, if God had no control over such things, then it is not his fault. However, the Christian I think is supposed to believe that God is omnipotent, which would then make him evil since he does nothing to change this law of heaven and hell.
 
@WillHunting The Christian does believe that God is omnipotent; but he also believes that God will not override a decision that an individual makes. If the individual chooses to put himself in Hell, God will regretfully allow that.
Does that seem fair?
 
@MattGutting An individual only chooses to believe or not believe in God. He doesn't choose whether to go to heaven or hell. If choosing not to believe makes him go to hell, and God does nothing about it, it would still be evil to me.
This discussion is getting intellectually difficult for me. My brain juices are not too good these days!
 
7:15 PM
@WillHunting Now that is not, for example, the Catholic belief. The Catholic belief is that Hell is (in effect at least) the individual's own decision. Should God override his decision? If so, why?
 
@MattGutting Either God is not omnipotent in which case it is not his fault that beings go to hell for not believing, or he is omnipotent, in which case it is evil to let beings go to hell and not do anything about it. That is how I feel.
 
@WillHunting Is it evil to override a person's will - to force them to do something they don't want to?
 
@MattGutting Yes, but in this case, I am not talking about God overriding a person's will to believe or not, but rather whether he has the power to stop beings from going to hell even if they did not believe in him.
Of course, it is possible that there is a natural law: beings go to hell for not believing.
However, it would be very hard to believe in such a law for me. And if true, I still consider God evil for not saving them from hell even though they don't believe.
 
@WillHunting Actually, I think you are talking about that very thing; because you're talking about the definition of Hell. If someone doesn't want to be with God, God will not force them to be with Him against their will. How could He?
To do such a thing would itself be evil.
And to "save them from Hell" is precisely "to force them to be with Him against their will".
2
 
7:35 PM
Is there a way to see the comments that got me the pundit badge?
I don't remember seeing a single comment of mine that has five votes.
 
@fredsbend Unless maybe you go to the Data Explorer
 
@MattGutting data.stackexchange.com/christianity/query/947/… just shows counts though, no links.
 
7:54 PM
@MattGutting Nice. You write that one? Maybe link to the comment too, assuming it is still there. Is that possible?
 
hm
Maybe
Easy for a question. Not so easy for an answer. I'd have to sit and think.
 
8:12 PM
@MattGutting I'm not sure where, but I think ` as [Post Link]` somewhere will do it.
 
Blood sugar is getting low - it's hard to think :-)
 
8:28 PM
@MattGutting I can't find a save button: add PostId as [Post Link], Body, Text, Comments.Score as the select member.
 
Very nice!
 
@MattGutting Well, you did most of it. I only did what I know best. Tweaked it ever so slightly then put my name on it.
 
 
1 hour later…
9:36 PM
0
Q: When/how do new moderators... become?

Hand of DonDo moderators retire after? or do we re-elect every moderator after a certain period of time? when are people eligible to become moderators?

 

« first day (1112 days earlier)      last day (3538 days later) »