« first day (474 days earlier)      last day (425 days later) » 

5:00 PM
3
Q: "Could" in various contexts

Zhanlong ZhengScene 1 from the movie Little Miss Sunshine Richard: And how Dwayne's utilizing seven of them in his personal quest to self-fulfillment. Sheryl: Richard, please. Richard: Well, I'm just saying I've come around. I think he could use our support. Olive: How did it happen? Fr...

See the comments to that question.
 
Anonymous
Oh, you can't do it in comments either.
 
Oh, somehow the system kicked me out of my logging in.
 
Would you agree "could" in Scene 3 is a suggestion?
I mena in that context it is a request to Neo. But they way that "could" is used there is similar to "you could use some help"
 
Anonymous
I would agree that the illocutionary force of the sentence is equivalent to the imperative form "Neo, help me"
 
Anonymous
I am not sure I can say that "could" is a suggestion
 
Anonymous
5:02 PM
I need to talk about larger units than that
 
Anonymous
"I could use some help" ≒ "I need some help" ≒ "Please help me"
 
Anonymous
Semantically speaking
 
Is it any different from "you could use some help"?
 
Anonymous
@Nico You're asking if the interpretation of the word could is different depending on the subject?
 
Anonymous
I think of could use as an idiom
 
5:04 PM
I'm asking if you think so
I think you may be right (cheking ngrams)
 
Anonymous
"I think he could use our support" ≒ "I think we should help him"
 
Anonymous
"I could use your help" ≒ "Please help me"
 
Anonymous
In both cases could use is something like "need"
 
Anonymous
I guess you can interpret it literally.
 
Anonymous
"I could make use of your help [because by myself, I am somewhat overwhelmed at the moment]"
 
 
Anonymous
"He could make use of our support [because by himself, he is somewhat overwhelmed at the moment]"
 
Anonymous
Something like that
 
ZZ has a lot of questions about modals. (Not to say that's bad though)
 
Anonymous
"Oh, man, I could use nap right now"
 
Anonymous
No, modals are a great topic for questions.
 
Anonymous
5:09 PM
I hardly ever answer them 'cause modals are hard ;-)
 
Agree!
 
Anonymous
I set a much lower bar for myself here in chat. I'll talk about whatever.
 
Anonymous
Sometimes before I've really thought it through.
 
"Aye, sir. I thought you might be able to use some help."
 
Anonymous
@Nico Yeah, I guess it's really just a property of use in constructions with modal meaning
 
Anonymous
5:11 PM
And could use is just a common collocation with those properties
 
Anonymous
Maybe I shouldn't refer to it as an idiom
 
@snailboat I you're right. "Use some help" only appears with can/could/be able.
I consider "use" and "make use" equivalent
 
Anonymous
Yeah, make use of is a paraphrase of use with the same meaning here.
 
Anonymous
Just like be able to is a paraphrase of can
 
I bet that we can find "I would/will use someone's help" in Ngram too.
 
Anonymous
5:18 PM
Doesn't sound quite as idiomatic to me, but I can't rule it out
 
"would use X help" is down.
The only thing Ngram returns for "will use * help" was "will use the help".
> The worker can only do her or his best to maximize the possibility that the client will use the help, leaving the final decision to the client.
> I will use the help of anyone willing to keep our history at home so it can be viewed by the descendents of the people who made it.
 
I'm think of adding this comment for ZZ:
> We're discussing "I could use some help" in the chat room. It is a common collocation/idiom. Its meaning is better explaned by how it is used than the usage of "could" as modal verb.
 
Anonymous
Ahh . . .
 
Anonymous
I haven't decided how best to describe it.
 
Anonymous
But it's clear that there's a sense of use which commonly appears in construction with words with modal meaning, such as can, could, and be able to
 
Anonymous
5:30 PM
Most commonly could use
 
Anonymous
That's what we've found so far, right?
 
yes
I just wanted to check, there is nothing utterly wrong with the comment.
 
Anonymous
I don't know how its meaning is best explained :-)
 
and I think ZZ could discuss modals with us here (and torture snailboat in the process :p).
 
Heehee.
 
Anonymous
5:36 PM
Well, it's okay. I like talking about English, and I feel helpful, like I'm a potential resource, even if I don't know everything about the language
 
Anonymous
Sometimes I worry that people take me too seriously :-)
 
Anonymous
But then enough people usually come around who don't, so it keeps me in line!
 
Anonymous
This modal verb stuff is hard.
 
nods
I think one thing that makes is harder than it should is because people in different regions use modal verbs differently.
 
Anonymous
Yeah.
 
5:42 PM
Though in Standard English (whatever that means), the usages are close.
 
Anonymous
There are multiple Standard Englishes.
 
That's quite likely!
 
Anonymous
People who speak different Standard Englishes in different regions use modal verbs differently.
 
Anonymous
Certain constructions are standard in AmE but not BrE, and vice versa.
 
nods
 
Anonymous
5:44 PM
It's true that there's no dialect that is universally perceived as standard across the world. It's usually more useful to refer to a construct as standard or non-standard, and one construct may be standard in e.g. British English and non-standard in American English. "Standard English", then, is shorthand for the dialect which contains the features that are standard in the relevant context, so a British speaker likely speaks a different Standard English than an American speaker does. Therefore, kiamlaluno is correct that there "isn't a Standard English", but there are many Standard Englishes. — snailplane Mar 2 '13 at 1:10
2
 
Wow!
 
I'm surprised that hasn't been starred ;O
 
I haven't finished reading it. :D
 
Oh wait it's from a question :\
 
Anonymous
It's from a year ago.
 
5:45 PM
I thought it was from this chat LOL
 
Anonymous
No, I just thought it'd be easier to quote myself than explain the same thing again. :-)
 
But a bit more seriously, I think the ELL (or ESL) tests are designed with some kind of Standard English (or a specific version of it) in mind.
Which might or might not reflect the reality.
 
Anonymous
Well, you can certainly test the set of features where there's overlap between the core dialect groups.
 
Anonymous
Since BrE and AmE are 99% the same.
 
^ Was about to say that ><
I've never seen a question that has different answers in different Standard Englishes.
 
5:50 PM
In tests?
 
In tests, yes.
Good ones, I mean.
 
Hmm... I'm not sure either, because I've never seen the real tests.
Do they try to force surely when we say sure or quickly when we say quick?
 
Anonymous
The last time I took a standardized test of English was when I took the SAT. I guess I was 14.
 
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Ha! You're skeptical of test-makers' ability to determine what is standard!
 
Yes, I am!
 
Anonymous
5:52 PM
"Yes, I am!"
 
I mean, test makers are people too.
 
Anonymous
It's true.
 
@DamkerngT. They do!
 
Anonymous
People do conflate formality and correctness.
 
They even consider singular they wrong!
 
Anonymous
5:53 PM
That's silly.
 
See, that's one. :D
 
Anonymous
There are times when singular they would probably be considered nonstandard, though.
 
Anonymous
For example, if the sex of a particular referent is known in the discourse and I nonetheless continue to refer to them as they
 
Anonymous
I'm not sure what precisely the limits are.
 
I'm not sure, but they might force us to use a perfect tense when a simple tense is fine too.
 
Anonymous
5:54 PM
I've never been comfortable with this "perfect tense" business.
 
I think I'm still not sure.
 
Anonymous
CGEL says it, too.
 
Anonymous
Why tense and not aspect?
 
Anonymous
I'm going to have to read that argument for the zillionth time.
 
Ahh... I think I've heard that once, perfect is better thought of as aspect. I think I agree with the idea.
 
Anonymous
5:56 PM
Because it still hasn't managed to get through my skull.
 
Anonymous
Not to be confused with perfective aspect
 
Anonymous
I really wish someone hadn't invented a contrast between perfect tenses and perfective aspect
 
Anonymous
That's one of the most confusing terminology piles anyone could have piled.
 
A lot of us learners are not taught 'aspects'. We know them just as parts of 'tense'.
 
Yes, so in our books, how many tenses do we have?
36?
 
5:57 PM
12?
The last time I checked LOL
 
Anonymous
Wow!
 
Anonymous
I'm most comfortable with saying English has two :-)
 
I tend to like simpler things, so I think the two-tense system is very attractive. :D
 
Anonymous
It makes the most sense to me.
 
Some even combine voices and tenses (with aspects), getting 24!
 
5:58 PM
I don't even know what aspect is = =.
 
continuous or progressive is a good example of aspects.
 
Oh thanks.
 
perfect is also often considered an aspect.
 
No problem. :D
That, too!
 
Anonymous
@Fantasier Yes, and in discussions of Japanese it's generally called an aspect
 
6:00 PM
ooooh! I have an aspect :)
 
Anonymous
I'm wearing a-spectacles.
 
Lulz
 
@snailboat LOL I like that one =b
 
Don't make aspectacle of yourself!
 
Anonymous
@SantiSantichaivekin It was aspectacular joke.
 
6:02 PM
which is aspectacularly funny.
 
Anonymous
+1 It might also be approached as an infinitive of purpose: "[I know him by sight, but ] not for the purpose of conversation" — StoneyB 1 min ago
 
Read for aspection?
 
Well, it's the same as the quote above. To a native speaker, that exchange as written doesn't make any sense. "I know not to speak to him" or "Not well enough to speak to him" work. — boatseller 33 mins ago
A-ha! This means that the phrase is not very common.
 
I suppose so.
 
HAve to admit I never heard it
 
Anonymous
6:05 PM
I don't think it's particularly common, but I recognized it.
 
I know "not to speak of", but that is almost exactly different
 
Anonymous
Enough to be relatively confident about what it means, anyway
 
I was trying to relate this "speak to" to "speak of", several times.
Obviously, I was wrong. :D
 
Anonymous
114
A: Increase close vote weight for gold tag badge holders

Tim PostUpdate: this is now enabled everywhere! The rules are: You can instantly close as a duplicate any question that was originally asked with a tag you have a gold badge for. You can instantly reopen any question closed as a duplicate that was originally asked with a tag you have a gold badge for....

 
Anonymous
StoneyB is our sole gold tag badge holder, and he has it in
 
Anonymous
6:13 PM
He's also our sole silver tag badge holder :-) Which he also has in
 
Nice!
 
Anonymous
(Although I'm at 320, and you get the silver one at 400! Yippee!)
 
Anonymous
So now StoneyB can instantly close as duplicate any grammar question.
 
Hmm, this is the first time I've seen meta.SE
 
I need one lousy pint for my first bronze. Also in grammar :(
 
6:14 PM
Seems to be relatively new.
 
@snailboat But only if it was originally tagged with grammar
 
Anonymous
@ParthKohli Yes. It was split off from Meta Stack Overflow
 
Anonymous
@oerkelens Yes.
 
Ah, it's meta.SO!
 
So smart dumb users can open questions without the tag :)
 
Anonymous
6:15 PM
It's okay. No one asks questions on ELL without tagging them grammar. It's some kind of rule.
 
The design looks much better.
 
Anonymous
@ParthKohli More precisely, it was split off from meta.SO. The latter exists, too:
 
Anonymous
 
Anonymous
But it's now specific to SO.
 
Anonymous
Some questions went one way, some questions went the other.
 
6:16 PM
I don't know if I will get any of those badges.
 
Thank you. What if a user wanted to port all their rep to meta.SO?
 
point! POINT! I don't need a pint!
 
Anonymous
Meta SO no longer has its own reputation system.
 
Aaaargh :'(
 
@oerkelens I think you don't need a pint, you need several.
 
Anonymous
6:17 PM
Like on normal metas, meta SO users inherit their reputation from SO.
 
Oh, just like all other sites.
Thanks.
 
Anonymous
MSE is exceptional still.
 
@DamkerngT. It doesn't help :(
 
browsing for typing course again
 
6:18 PM
I read that line as Alex Murphy made his sacrifices already (hinted by "recovery", "how many times", and "have been"), and the decision the Senate will make tomorrow will definitely result in one of the possibilities: that the sacrifice "will have been" or "will not have been" in vain. — Damkerng T. 2 mins ago
 
Today I managed to "paraphrase" a sentence in the exact original words :(
 
I just made another guess. Hope that it's reasonable enough. (I haven't watched it yet.)
 
Anonymous
I'm not planning on watching the new Robocop movie(s?)
 
And @DamkerngT. dutifully edited the typo the OP had made out of my C/P as well
 
@oerkelens I'm sure that your "paraphrase" is as good as the original. :D
 
Anonymous
6:19 PM
If the perfect construction does locate the action in time, then I suppose in this case perfect tense seems appropriate
 
@snailboat You can watch me, a robomop, instead. :P
 
yeah, I had typed a whole different sentence, but my connection was hickupping
 
Anonymous
Hooray!
 
Anonymous
Oh, no! Your connection has the hiccups!
 
Anonymous
Place a small dab of pure sugar on its tongue.
 
6:20 PM
I've had too many pints!
 
It had:) I had no sugar, so I suddenly yelled at it. It got scared and the hiccups were gone
And then my colleagues were upset :(
 
Oh, I always use a bag.
 
Anonymous
Sugar always works for me.
 
Anonymous
It stimulates the vagus nerve, donchano.
 
I don't know why breathing in a plastic bag works, but it seems to work for me, very well.
 
6:22 PM
Used to eat chalk. Now they have no black boards anymore, so no chalk available :(
 
Hah! For real?
 
@DamkerngT. If you do it long enough, it cures everything :P
 
Anonymous
Oh! Snails like to eat chalk.
 
Anonymous
They use it to build their shells.
 
@oerkelens Yeah, it can put me out of my misery, too.
 
6:22 PM
@DamkerngT. Prolly same effect as sugar
@snailboat And ever seen a snail with hiccups?
 
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. Sugar cures it within one hiccup for me every time. It doesn't work for my housemate, though.
 
Means it works, right?
 
Anonymous
@oerkelens Don't be silly! Snails' nervous systems are too simple for that sort of dysfunction.
 
@snailboat I say it is the chalk. Makes more sense
:)
 
Anonymous
Snails are a deadly serious topic.
 
Anonymous
6:24 PM
Also, they're cute.
 
Cute little serious things. :P
 
I will try sugar next time. Have to get sugar though. I have no sugar in the house in any free form
 
Anonymous
 
@snailboat Sounds like women. :)
 
Anonymous
That's Snaily.
 
6:25 PM
I think I can see one snail, but not sure if there are two snails in the pic.
 
Anonymous
Only one.
 
There are snails crossing the sidewalk in the morning. Always same direction, as if they have meeting on the other side every night....
 
gulp
 
Oh!
What is that big brown thingy?
 
Anonymous
Snaily's acorn house!
 
6:26 PM
I'm starting to grow suspicious. I'm thinking about bringing some of them in for questioning.
 
Anonymous
Sadly, I dropped it a few weeks ago and it broke.
 
Neat!
@snailboat Aww... That's too bad.
@oerkelens So they do that regularly, every night?
 
Anonymous
I'll have to get a new one. Right now I put the red house from Baby Town in.
 
Anonymous
This house, if you remember the babies:
 
Anonymous
 
6:27 PM
@DamkerngT. They must. Every morning they cross the sidewalk from right to left. So at night they must have been going the other way
 
@snailboat I do!
@oerkelens Considering their speed, that must be quite an adventure for them!
 
I think kitties are cute, but I have to admit snails are too
 
@snailboat Oh, so you pet a snail? Great!
 
@DamkerngT. Yeah, so they must be really motivated. That is what makes me suspicious
 
Oh, cats can have hiccups too. Very funny. :D
 
Anonymous
6:29 PM
@SantiSantichaivekin My icon is my pet snail Bean.
 
Anonymous
 
gulp
 
@DamkerngT. Cats copy humans so much I sometimes wonder if it is not us copying them :)
 
@ParthKohli Does a pic of a snail make you hungry?
 
Is it eating something?
 
Anonymous
6:30 PM
That is a slice of banana.
 
@oerkelens That's quite possible. I think sometimes my cat think he is petting me, not the other way around. :D
 
@DamkerngT. Hunger is when you have the urge to take food in. Looking at snails gives me the urge to do it the other way.
 
@DamkerngT. Well, actually I'm quite sure cats domesticated us
 
@ParthKohli Aww... but they are cute too!
@oerkelens LOL
 
@snailboat Be careful, overeating may makes your snail fat =b.
 
6:32 PM
I mean, they were living happily in Africa, they found a bunch of weird apes breeding rats. So, they decided to keep them :)
 
@oerkelens Hah! So that was how it began!
 
Anonymous
@SantiSantichaivekin It's okay, they know how much to eat :-)
 
Yups. Egyptians bred rats in big grain warehouses. Cats liked hat very much, so they decided humans were useful. Let's face it, who came out of it on top? The humans that fed, petted and adored the cats? Or the cats that made it to be gods? Literally?
 
Anonymous
@ParthKohli So you're gulping down vomit?
 
@snailboat A quality that cats don't have. :D
 
6:35 PM
I mean, just imagine walking in on a species and making them pray to you as a god
That is power :)
 
Anonymous
Do you have an aversion to all mollusks or just land-mollusks?
 
Anonymous
 
@snailboat [GULPING INTENSIFIES]
 
@oerkelens Oh, now it starts to make sense!
 
@DamkerngT. Again, just like humans, some cats eat too much :)
@snailboat A sea cat!
Cute!
They had one in the zoo near where I lived
went to say hi every weekend :)
 
6:36 PM
Oh, I'm not quite sure what I'm looking at!
I've heard it from somewhere that squids are smart too.
 
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. A cuttlefish!
 
@DamkerngT. A cuttlefish / sea cat / sepia (yes, it has ink, and the name of the colour comes from this animal)
 
Anonymous
A cuttlefish is like a land slug
 
It's a squid
like thingee
 
Anonymous
Land slugs evolved from snails to have only an internal shell
 
Anonymous
6:38 PM
And cuttlefish too evolved to have only an internal shell
 
Eh? So slugs have shells too, but internally?
 
@snailboat Except that it doesn't live on land, it can swim, it has arms and sprays ink?
 
Anonymous
Most do, yes.
 
Anonymous
@oerkelens I was drawing a parallel, not defining them
 
Anonymous
Like slugs, they're mollusks that evolved to have internal shells. :-)
 
6:39 PM
:)
 
Anonymous
Which is what I said.
 
Still, I somehow think a sea cat would be insulted to be called a slug
or even compared to it
even remotely
 
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. But snails' shells are all very different because they evolve to suit the snail in its native habitat. Slugs' shells are vestigial and are mostly undifferentiated between species
 
Are those related to later skeletons or not?
 
Anonymous
Skeletons?
 
6:42 PM
like bones
inside bodies
 
Anonymous
I know what a skeleton is.
 
of vertebrates
:)
 
hi
 
I think fishes and mollusks have evolved separately since a long time ago.
@Theta30 Hello!
 
wow
 
Anonymous
6:42 PM
All mollusks are invertebrates.
 
I was just wondering if there was any link between the internal calcium shell and the internal calcium vertebrae :)
 
Anonymous
There are no skeletons later in the evolutionary chain
 
@oerkelens That makes me feel like missing my old science books.
 
Hi @Theta30 :)
@snailboat Not in mollusks. But iirc there were mollusks way before vertebrates
 
Anonymous
At least, as far as I'm aware, we're not aware of any evidence that any vertebrates are descended from Mollusca.
 
6:47 PM
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3237026/
dislocation of mineralized skeleton from the outside to the inside of animal bodies, proved to be a major adaptive advantage. Especially in animal lineages that later gave rise to vertebrates, the appearance of endoskeleton enabled the expansion of activity radius and habitation of entirely new environments (Bennet 1991)
(p 3)
haven't read th ewhole thing yet :)
 
Anonymous
Let me know if you find something relevant!
 
Yups, I was indeed off by some years :)
well, millions
:P
Forgot that tiny detail about the mouth thingee
Protostomes and deuterostomes, led to molluscs and chordata (vertebrates) respectively
So, the skeleton evolved without the help of snails :P
 
@oerkelens Hi
 
Hi :)
 
Anonymous
@oerkelens There's remarkably little fossil evidence for mollusk evolution
 
7:01 PM
mmmm... some of the most common fossils are mollusks, no?
They just didn't seem busy evolving?
 
Anonymous
@oerkelens Punctuated equilibrium
 
Wait, how did you all go from a, um, deadly serious topic like pet snails to this ultimately deadly academically serious biology topic?
 
I hope that is not a rude expression :P
@Fantasier why, it's still about molluscs
And all the while I'm reading up on Snail Painting
Although it wasn;t what I thought it would be :D
 
Anyway I'm going to bed z_z See you all later!
 
Ah, see you. Have a good sleep!
 
Anonymous
7:08 PM
@Fantasier Rest well!
 
@Fantasier I think it's like one minute we were talking about conversational English, and the next minute we would be talking about things like "experential perfect", which could even be more interesting! :D
 
Rest well!
 
@ParthKohli Well, he writes fantasy books, right?
runs
 
7:45 PM
> I walked a lot to get there.
What would be the default interpretation of the native speaker?
It was a long walk?
I usually walked to arrive there?
 
Anonymous
@DamkerngT. This one.
 
Ahh... thanks! That's very helpful.
So it's a one time thing.
0
Q: What are the ways I can express this?

Trevör Anne DeniseIn french, there are some situations where we say "Moi non."/"Moi oui." (that could be literally translated as "Me no."/"Me yes."). You can use it when somebody told something and when for you, it is the opposite of what this person said, for example "- I don't know how to open this bottle ! - ...

It's interesting, but I don't know how French operates.
> I don't know how to open this bottle. Moi oui!
"Moi oui!" = "But I can." -- maybe?
 

« first day (474 days earlier)      last day (425 days later) »