@Tom There's no such thing as "free lunch" when it comes to reviewing things like that… and if, you'll mostly get what you paid for. ;)

But that might just be me. Who knows? You might get lucky — but don't set your hopes too high or end up being disappointed when no one jumps at your request.

@Tom Nevertheless, you could throw a link to the related paper and/or reference source code in here… in a worst case, it'll be ignored — in a best case, someone picks it up to look at it.

@Tom Submitting it to a crypto conference nets you approximately 3 free reviews :-)

Hi @MickLH how are you?

@EllaRose I'm doing ok, how about yourself?

Having fun crypting all the things, I implemented that single pass aead thing in C and I'm thinking of trying to write/generate a python wrapper for it so I can use it for my epqcrypto package

sounds fun

I implemented recursive Lamport signatures into my identification scheme

and made them the default key type

because I don't trust anything at all, and that's the most assumptions I can cut out

sounds like a nice and solid foundation for the root of trust

at least, in the software realm

I actually changed the default config to Lamport master key with an RSA sub key

I'm not sure what to use for key exchange yet... I have been thinking I should implement SIDH, NewHope, and Frodo

and then key exchange with all of them (and another RSA key) and hope one of them lasts

@CurveEnthusiast even though chances are you have to wait months for the review results?