@MarkMayo Are you suggesting to change all the tag excerpts because a UK citizen might not actually be travelling with their UK passport? If so note that it'll entail an enormous amount of editing.
@MarkMayo: i've thought about that a few times over the years and reckon x-citizens and x-passports are different but people would mix them up if we differentiated them
we could combine them but i can't think of any way to word a tag that would fit and obviously cover both citizens and passports
@hippietrail I'm not saying we split them. I'm just saying when the tag is [x-citizens] the description should be that too. Then if the qusetion is about passports too, add passports
so anyway when i've thought about it before i think the best way was to just pick X-citizens as the tag wording and put in the wikitext that it covers people travelling with a document from X and say why and say why the tag name couldn't cover it in full
indeed we could have a question about a US Citizen travelling in USA which doesn't need a passport, or even a Chileno travelling in South America (they've got some shared ID card now, so don't need a passport to travel)
i'm thinking more of palestinians i've met who have passports from some other middle eastern country where they don't live. or people i've met who only ever lived in kuwait but have passports from where there ancestors were from. or stuff along those lines since i don't really understand it all
yeah at the end of the day the site is about problems travellers face and the tags are to kind of group and classify the problems. so tags must be problem-centric
it's worth a whole meta discussion but those either end up having almost no comments are big arguments nobody agrees on (-: