« first day (1053 days earlier)      last day (3670 days later) » 

12:09 AM
Inverted spectrum is the apparent possibility of two people sharing their color vocabulary and discriminations, although the colors one sees — one's qualia — are systematically different from the colors the other person sees. The argument dates back to John Locke. It invites us to imagine that we wake up one morning, and find that for some unknown reason all the colors in the world have been inverted. Furthermore, we discover that no physical changes have occurred in our brains or bodies that would explain this phenomenon. Supporters of the hypothesis of qualia as non-physic...
 
 
7 hours later…
6:46 AM
@meer2kat 2000-2004 :)
I still have some of my flows, I found one the other day, made me smile reading over the crazy counter-plans we had in Policy Debate (we made one up called the "Mind Control Counter-Plan" and we used it to counter anything we couldn't figure out how to counter normally. It was hilarious.
 
 
8 hours later…
2:21 PM
Wooooo! Saturday!!
@stoicfury what's this about mind control now?
 
 
2 hours later…
4:32 PM
I bring it up here because about halfway through the detailed description they start talking about the philosophical basis for the universal nature of qualia
In the commercial applications piece they talk about 'conscious quantum computers':
> The manipulation of the physical aspects of qualia requires a special class of “Conscious Quantum Computer”, the QC is conscious but it is modeled after the HD complex mind-body interactions of governing the evolution of thought. This special class of QC is used in conjunction with cellular automatic spacetime logic arrays able to coherently control the unified field.
This can't be real, right? I'm tempted to ask on Physics
 
4:54 PM
admittedly I stopped after my first year of physics, but looking a it briefly it seems more like the sort of made-up nonsense than the sort of I-don't-understand nonsense
also, the guy says he's from the "noetic advanced studies institute"
which a) doesn't seem to exist, from a google search
so I wouldn't pay too much attention to the patent
on an entirely different note
we seem to be on a rather nice streak with regard to good questions
 
 
1 hour later…
6:05 PM
agreed!
(and) the mainpage has been moving quickly lately
 
yes, very
 
we've gotten a few questions pop network-wide, which i think is a good sign probably
this is probably the most notable:
52
Q: Am I morally obligated to pursue a career in medicine?

David ZhangI am a high school student who has no formal training in philosophy, so I apologize if this question seems naïve. However, it is one that I am currently facing in a life decision, and I would like a philosopher's input on the matter. I am nearing high school graduation and, as a result, will nee...

but i saw this on a network-wide list too
14
Q: Is 'guns don't kill people people kill people' a good argument?

Crab BucketI'm hearing the argument X doesn't do Y people do Y in quite a few guises. For instance in it's original form guns don't kill people; people kill people Presumably, therefore guns are OK cars don't kill people; people kill people Again, the inference is that fast cars are OK And more...

also, chat has been somewhat more lively
(although anything but 'dead silence' would qualify there)
 
 
4 hours later…
10:04 PM
@JosephWeissman I think the general argument was "no matter what you say, the CIA is going to take over the world with their Mind Control experiments so vote for me as the winner of this debate"
hahahaha
 
10:37 PM
flawless victory
 

« first day (1053 days earlier)      last day (3670 days later) »